London to Vancouver 20 years later,
#1
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

Good Afternoon people of this forum!
Long time lurker. I'll give a bit of background below.
In 2004, I received my landed documents in Canada. I was 13 years old and we moved to Canada. I did not stay for 720 days, I moved back to the UK and studied then started working.
I am now 33 years old and I want to come back to Canada and continue my PR status. I have a report from the immigration office stating my PR has not been revoked.
I have had many consultations with lawyers and all have stated that I can travel to Canada via the land route (car) through America. I will be coming with my family, wife and 2 kids (1 of them is a step child I will adopt). They have said the best route is H&C grounds under the basis I was too young to make my own decision when we left. At least 3 consultants (paid) have echoed this. I know that when I get to the border, the officer can start the process of revoking my PR or not.
I have 2 degrees, a bachelors and masters in Science if that helps.
I guess I'm asking for some clarification around the above and maybe some experiences or if anyone can recommend good immigration lawyers? Of course I want to do everything legally and above board.
Any advice would be appreciated!
Thank you in advance
SB
Long time lurker. I'll give a bit of background below.
In 2004, I received my landed documents in Canada. I was 13 years old and we moved to Canada. I did not stay for 720 days, I moved back to the UK and studied then started working.
I am now 33 years old and I want to come back to Canada and continue my PR status. I have a report from the immigration office stating my PR has not been revoked.
I have had many consultations with lawyers and all have stated that I can travel to Canada via the land route (car) through America. I will be coming with my family, wife and 2 kids (1 of them is a step child I will adopt). They have said the best route is H&C grounds under the basis I was too young to make my own decision when we left. At least 3 consultants (paid) have echoed this. I know that when I get to the border, the officer can start the process of revoking my PR or not.
I have 2 degrees, a bachelors and masters in Science if that helps.
I guess I'm asking for some clarification around the above and maybe some experiences or if anyone can recommend good immigration lawyers? Of course I want to do everything legally and above board.
Any advice would be appreciated!
Thank you in advance
SB
Last edited by silverback12; Mar 5th 2025 at 2:11 am.
#2
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 885











Good Afternoon people of this forum!
Long time lurker. I'll give a bit of background below.
In 2004, I received my landed documents in Canada. I was 13 years old and we moved to Canada. I did not stay for 720 days, I moved back to the UK and studied then started working.
I am now 33 years old and I want to come back to Canada and continue my PR status. I have a report from the immigration office stating my PR has not been revoked.
I have had many consultations with lawyers and all have stated that I can travel to Canada via the land route (car) through America. I will be coming with my family, wife and 2 kids (1 of them is a step child I will adopt). They have said the best route is H&C grounds under the basis I was too young to make my own decision when we left. At least 3 consultants (paid) have echoed this. I know that when I get to the border, the officer can start the process of revoking my PR or not.
I have 2 degrees, a bachelors and masters in Science if that helps.
I guess I'm asking for some clarification around the above and maybe some experiences or if anyone can recommend good immigration lawyers? Of course I want to do everything legally and above board.
Any advice would be appreciated!
Thank you in advance
SB
Long time lurker. I'll give a bit of background below.
In 2004, I received my landed documents in Canada. I was 13 years old and we moved to Canada. I did not stay for 720 days, I moved back to the UK and studied then started working.
I am now 33 years old and I want to come back to Canada and continue my PR status. I have a report from the immigration office stating my PR has not been revoked.
I have had many consultations with lawyers and all have stated that I can travel to Canada via the land route (car) through America. I will be coming with my family, wife and 2 kids (1 of them is a step child I will adopt). They have said the best route is H&C grounds under the basis I was too young to make my own decision when we left. At least 3 consultants (paid) have echoed this. I know that when I get to the border, the officer can start the process of revoking my PR or not.
I have 2 degrees, a bachelors and masters in Science if that helps.
I guess I'm asking for some clarification around the above and maybe some experiences or if anyone can recommend good immigration lawyers? Of course I want to do everything legally and above board.
Any advice would be appreciated!
Thank you in advance
SB
What sounds odd to me is that PR hasn't been revoked if you've been outside of Canada for such a long time. However if Immigration Canada tells you it's not revoked then it isn't.
What's also odd is that you're to travel via the land route. If PR status still exists you should be able to travel by air directly from London to Vancouver.
#3
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 388
From: Calgary, Alberta











If you don't have one, as in the case with the OP, then you can cross at the land border where CBSA have access to the Canadian system to confirm PR status. Or maybe in this case, confirm a lack of PR status.
#5
#6
I will be coming with my family, wife and 2 kids (1 of them is a step child I will adopt). They have said the best route is H&C grounds under the basis I was too young to make my own decision when we left. At least 3 consultants (paid) have echoed this. I know that when I get to the border, the officer can start the process of revoking my PR or not.
Good luck.
#7
I would apply for a renewal on your PR card from the online portal, sent to a relative in Canada who can forward it to you.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
#8
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
From: Vancouver, BC











I would apply for a renewal on your PR card from the online portal, sent to a relative in Canada who can forward it to you.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
#9
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

#10
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

Just checking, you’ll be travelling alone to start with until a determination is made on your status? Your family are highly unlikely to be granted entry if they are travelling with you, as they have no status in Canada until you sponsor them for PR and it would be pretty obvious they wouldn’t be genuine visitors. I absolutely wouldn’t put them through that, particularly the kids. It would be best to wait for them to join you until you know what the situation is and the chances of them getting a visa through you are.
Good luck.
Good luck.
#11
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

You can't apply for a PR card outside of Canada (even with a relatives address). If IRCC suspect or know that you are outside of Canada (and given that address/travel history is part of the form), then they will simply return/deny the application. The OP can apply for a PRTD and submit H&C grounds that the PRTD should be approved ) This is probably the best option imo.
#12
I'm going to tag Former Lancastrian , our resident former CBSA officer, who can tell you how he'd have dealt with you/your family rocking up after 20 years away and trying to enter as a PR. And hopefully give you some advice.
Last edited by christmasoompa; May 9th 2026 at 12:38 am.
#13
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

I would apply for a renewal on your PR card from the online portal, sent to a relative in Canada who can forward it to you.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
I would not risk entering via the United States, there have been a few instances now where people have been turned away at the Canadian border and picked up by ICE and detained, even for just innocent mistakes. A British backpacker and a Canadian tourist from BC most recently. The US is very hostile to immigrants and Canada under the Trump regime.
#14
Thread Starter
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 6

You may be be more likely to be rejected (although I'm not sure I agree with that - border officers aren't going to wave you through just because you have a couple of cute kids with you!), but the flip side is that they are more likely to be rejected. As I said above, they can't legitimately claim to be visitors to Canada when they're accompanying you. And if they say they're trying to stay, that's not going to work either. So for the reasons I set out above, I wouldn't be risking it personally, it wouldn't be fair to put them through that. But your call obviously and I guess depends on how old the kids are - if they're older teens you can explain to them that they may be refused entry and kicked back to the US, but younger kids would likely find that very upsetting.
I'm going to tag Former Lancastrian , our resident former CBSA officer, who can tell you how he'd have dealt with you/your family rocking up after 20 years away and trying to enter as a PR. And hopefully give you some advice.
I'm going to tag Former Lancastrian , our resident former CBSA officer, who can tell you how he'd have dealt with you/your family rocking up after 20 years away and trying to enter as a PR. And hopefully give you some advice.
Former Lancastrian the lawyers have said my case would be possible but I understand they may just be trying to make $4000 off me.
My arguement would be, and truthfully, that I left against my will as a child, and until 2 years ago, I didnt actually know I could return or my PR was still valid. During the 22 years away, I looked after my grandparents, who are no longer here, built a career and had kids. Now I am selling my house and leaving a successful career in a director position to come back to Canada.
#15
Thank you for your prompt response. 1 will be in his teens and the other will be a child less than 5 years old. My wife may also be pregnant. Thank you for the tag.
Former Lancastrian the lawyers have said my case would be possible but I understand they may just be trying to make $4000 off me.
My arguement would be, and truthfully, that I left against my will as a child, and until 2 years ago, I didnt actually know I could return or my PR was still valid. During the 22 years away, I looked after my grandparents, who are no longer here, built a career and had kids. Now I am selling my house and leaving a successful career in a director position to come back to Canada.
Former Lancastrian the lawyers have said my case would be possible but I understand they may just be trying to make $4000 off me.
My arguement would be, and truthfully, that I left against my will as a child, and until 2 years ago, I didnt actually know I could return or my PR was still valid. During the 22 years away, I looked after my grandparents, who are no longer here, built a career and had kids. Now I am selling my house and leaving a successful career in a director position to come back to Canada.





