In-land Sponsorship, Mr Miller pls?
Oct 2nd 2002, 10:53 pm
#1
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 39
In-land Sponsorship, Mr Miller pls?
Hello Andrew 
I saw on one of the threads you answered that there is no in-land process for conjugal partners. Are there no exceptions to this at all, meaning H&C Grounds if there is a good enough case?
I am trying to justify in my mind why they would not allow this for conjugal partner, and yet will allow it for common-law and spouse. It's obvious that conjugal partners can not live together on a permanent basis until they get their PR, so why not let them stay as visitors the same way they would for a spouse who is here on a visitor visa? Without that visitor visa, the spouses would not be able to live together either, unless in the other country, (hence, no need for an in-land sponsorship if they can live *somewhere* together)
Sorry, I guess I'm just blowing off steam here lol but each direction we take, where we think we'll succeed, something else comes up, it's getting pretty darn depressing But I suppose we should just be grateful for the conjugal partner category being added to Family Class.
*Back to the drawing board*
Regards,
PatC
I saw on one of the threads you answered that there is no in-land process for conjugal partners. Are there no exceptions to this at all, meaning H&C Grounds if there is a good enough case?
I am trying to justify in my mind why they would not allow this for conjugal partner, and yet will allow it for common-law and spouse. It's obvious that conjugal partners can not live together on a permanent basis until they get their PR, so why not let them stay as visitors the same way they would for a spouse who is here on a visitor visa? Without that visitor visa, the spouses would not be able to live together either, unless in the other country, (hence, no need for an in-land sponsorship if they can live *somewhere* together)
Sorry, I guess I'm just blowing off steam here lol but each direction we take, where we think we'll succeed, something else comes up, it's getting pretty darn depressing
But I suppose we should just be grateful for the conjugal partner category being added to Family Class.*Back to the drawing board*
Regards,
PatC
Oct 3rd 2002, 12:32 am
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: In-land Sponsorship, Mr Miller pls?
I didn't create the law, so I cannot answer for sure why it is as it is. But
there was probably a need for limiting an opportunity to abuse the entire
inland class. Why not get married and sponsor a spouse then?
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"PatC" wrote in message
news:432149.1033599184@britishexpats-
.com...
> Hello Andrew
> I saw on one of the threads you answered that there is no in-land
> process for conjugal partners. Are there no exceptions to this at all,
> meaning H&C Grounds if there is a good enough case?
> I am trying to justify in my mind why they would not allow this for
> conjugal partner, and yet will allow it for common-law and spouse. It's
> obvious that conjugal partners can not live together on a permanent
> basis until they get their PR, so why not let them stay as visitors the
> same way they would for a spouse who is here on a visitor visa? Without
> that visitor visa, the spouses would not be able to live together
> either, unless in the other country, (hence, no need for an in-land
> sponsorship if they can live *somewhere* together)
> Sorry, I guess I'm just blowing off steam here lol but each direction we
> take, where we think we'll succeed, something else comes up, it's
> getting pretty darn depressing But I suppose we should just be
> grateful for the conjugal partner category being added to Family Class.
> *Back to the drawing board*
> Regards,
> PatC
> --
> PatC
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
there was probably a need for limiting an opportunity to abuse the entire
inland class. Why not get married and sponsor a spouse then?
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: [email protected]
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"PatC" wrote in message
news:432149.1033599184@britishexpats-
.com...
> Hello Andrew
> I saw on one of the threads you answered that there is no in-land
> process for conjugal partners. Are there no exceptions to this at all,
> meaning H&C Grounds if there is a good enough case?
> I am trying to justify in my mind why they would not allow this for
> conjugal partner, and yet will allow it for common-law and spouse. It's
> obvious that conjugal partners can not live together on a permanent
> basis until they get their PR, so why not let them stay as visitors the
> same way they would for a spouse who is here on a visitor visa? Without
> that visitor visa, the spouses would not be able to live together
> either, unless in the other country, (hence, no need for an in-land
> sponsorship if they can live *somewhere* together)
> Sorry, I guess I'm just blowing off steam here lol but each direction we
> take, where we think we'll succeed, something else comes up, it's
> getting pretty darn depressing
But I suppose we should just be> grateful for the conjugal partner category being added to Family Class.
> *Back to the drawing board*
> Regards,
> PatC
> --
> PatC
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
