Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
#1
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 76
Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Please note that It will be a huge delay in all applications in buffalo office from 2-3 years for any application with AOR after 2002.
It is the biggest delay in the immigration process. Read the news.
It is the biggest delay in the immigration process. Read the news.
#3
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Same delays will be in all visa posts due to the settlement cases - 130,000 of previously frozen pre-2002 applications have been thrown back into processing and half of them (including all 1999 and earlier) must be completed by middle of 2006, all 2000 cases completed by middle of 2007 and all 2001 applications must be completed by the end of 2008. Read Article 3c here for details:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/mandamu...ent-final.html
130,000 applications represent statistically more than 270,000 visas versus annual quota of about 135,000 to 145,000 visas available in affected SW class. So yes, they will affect all still pending cases submitted in 2002 and later.
Additional delays for 2002 and later cases may be anywhere from several months to 3+ years, depending from visa post.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/mandamu...ent-final.html
130,000 applications represent statistically more than 270,000 visas versus annual quota of about 135,000 to 145,000 visas available in affected SW class. So yes, they will affect all still pending cases submitted in 2002 and later.
Additional delays for 2002 and later cases may be anywhere from several months to 3+ years, depending from visa post.
Originally Posted by CanadaMan
Please note that It will be a huge delay in all applications in buffalo office from 2-3 years for any application with AOR after 2002.
It is the biggest delay in the immigration process. Read the news.
It is the biggest delay in the immigration process. Read the news.
#4
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 476
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
but will this affect the already been gone throw IA , medicals ..etc?
#5
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Yes, it will affect all pending cases - although to various extend. Those waiting only for security check will get their final decision and passport request just after those pre-2002 cases at similar stage of the process, providing that visas are still available for the year.
Originally Posted by Ibraheem
but will this affect the already been gone throw IA , medicals ..etc?
#6
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 93
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Mr. Miller:
Following the numbers you have provided, does this mean that just about all of the 2006 quota will be used to comply with the court order (if about 130,000 visas will be required to meet the court order in 2006)?
Does that mean that people expecting a PPR now can expect to wait until 2007 or later?
If this is so, does the government have any strategy to treat current applicants equitably?
Thank you for your response.
Following the numbers you have provided, does this mean that just about all of the 2006 quota will be used to comply with the court order (if about 130,000 visas will be required to meet the court order in 2006)?
Does that mean that people expecting a PPR now can expect to wait until 2007 or later?
If this is so, does the government have any strategy to treat current applicants equitably?
Thank you for your response.
#7
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
130,000 cases means about 270,000+ visas - it is 2 years quota of visas in SW class. But only half of it must be completed by middle of 2006 and the rest until end of 2008. So, the hardest hit is now and through next year - later it will still affect all but to lesser extend. And hiccups and delays caused by growing completely out of control backlog will be felt for next 10 to 20 years or longer, unless CIC raises pass mark to clear backlog and/or stops accepting applications for few years.
Why "treat current applications equally"? Those 130,000 applicants are in the process already for several years (some 5 or 7 years already), they deserve the first priority now. Why should they give up what they deserve to applicants who applied years after them?
Why "treat current applications equally"? Those 130,000 applicants are in the process already for several years (some 5 or 7 years already), they deserve the first priority now. Why should they give up what they deserve to applicants who applied years after them?
Originally Posted by Tab
Mr. Miller:
Following the numbers you have provided, does this mean that just about all of the 2006 quota will be used to comply with the court order (if about 130,000 visas will be required to meet the court order in 2006)?
Does that mean that people expecting a PPR now can expect to wait until 2007 or later?
If this is so, does the government have any strategy to treat current applicants equitably?
Thank you for your response.
Following the numbers you have provided, does this mean that just about all of the 2006 quota will be used to comply with the court order (if about 130,000 visas will be required to meet the court order in 2006)?
Does that mean that people expecting a PPR now can expect to wait until 2007 or later?
If this is so, does the government have any strategy to treat current applicants equitably?
Thank you for your response.
#8
Just Joined
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Originally Posted by Andrew Miller
130,000 cases means about 270,000+ visas - it is 2 years quota of visas in SW class. But only half of it must be completed by middle of 2006 and the rest until end of 2008. So, the hardest hit is now and through next year - later it will still affect all but to lesser extend. And hiccups and delays caused by growing completely out of control backlog will be felt for next 10 to 20 years or longer, unless CIC raises pass mark to clear backlog and/or stops accepting applications for few years.
Why "treat current applications equally"? Those 130,000 applicants are in the process already for several years (some 5 or 7 years already), they deserve the first priority now. Why should they give up what they deserve to applicants who applied years after them?
Why "treat current applications equally"? Those 130,000 applicants are in the process already for several years (some 5 or 7 years already), they deserve the first priority now. Why should they give up what they deserve to applicants who applied years after them?
if not they should have been finilised at time, because of the bring forward date, so they check these files at regular basics ?
i m not trying to act smart here, but isn't this how the system work ?
and i have a question : how do we know that it s 130 000 cases ?
Last edited by sww; Oct 18th 2005 at 5:03 pm.
#9
Just Joined
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
What this says to me... is that the Skilled Worker class is now essentially worthless to apply for Immigration. Because if you applied today then by the time you got your Visa it would almost be 2010. Heck the Olympics might come and go before you ever get here.
So it seems the only way people will be coming to Canada is either by doing the Provincial Nominee program or by Marrying into the Country. Everything else will take so long as to be largely unreasonable.
I feel for the LawSuit people's plight but the Canadian govt in their decision now by re-enfranchising one group of people is disenfranchising another... So it isn't truly fair to those that are currently having their applications looked at in varying stages to have a great firery mountain dropped on them much like the original lawsuit folks did with IRPA that caused all this grief in the first place.
So in short they are creating a new set of problems by fixing an old set. It's like trading one for one. They aren't really doing anything except seemingly adding more wood to their already too high blazing of a fire. From reading stuff here and going to a few presentations it seems like CIC is drowning in their own beaurocracy and ocean of paperwork.
This is just my opinion and I could be completely wrong and underinformed. Another idea that comes to mind that would clear the backlog instead of increasing the passmark to weed people out is to in essence throw the door open much like the US in the 19th Century. But before I get flamed not in as open and non-paperworked way. Hire more Visa Officers, Streamline processes that check things out, double or even triple the Immigration Visa Quota or just do away with it all together. So it would be an if your Qualified then come on down rule possibly.
I'm not saying it wouldn't bring some problems of its own but it would incourage migration to Canada instead of discouraging it.
So it seems the only way people will be coming to Canada is either by doing the Provincial Nominee program or by Marrying into the Country. Everything else will take so long as to be largely unreasonable.
I feel for the LawSuit people's plight but the Canadian govt in their decision now by re-enfranchising one group of people is disenfranchising another... So it isn't truly fair to those that are currently having their applications looked at in varying stages to have a great firery mountain dropped on them much like the original lawsuit folks did with IRPA that caused all this grief in the first place.
So in short they are creating a new set of problems by fixing an old set. It's like trading one for one. They aren't really doing anything except seemingly adding more wood to their already too high blazing of a fire. From reading stuff here and going to a few presentations it seems like CIC is drowning in their own beaurocracy and ocean of paperwork.
This is just my opinion and I could be completely wrong and underinformed. Another idea that comes to mind that would clear the backlog instead of increasing the passmark to weed people out is to in essence throw the door open much like the US in the 19th Century. But before I get flamed not in as open and non-paperworked way. Hire more Visa Officers, Streamline processes that check things out, double or even triple the Immigration Visa Quota or just do away with it all together. So it would be an if your Qualified then come on down rule possibly.
I'm not saying it wouldn't bring some problems of its own but it would incourage migration to Canada instead of discouraging it.
#10
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Seems you are new here and brief history lesson may be in order.
Those are cases filed prior to 2002 and new law implemented in 2002 made them retroactively subject to new selection criteria. Some of those 130,000 applicants would not qualify under new rules, although not all. But quite few lawyers "smelled blood" (read big money) and filed a class action lawsuit, collecting thousands of $$$ from naive clients mainly in India to have them inclued in the lawsuit, while once it was classified as class action lawsuit all affected were automatically included, unless decided to not participate. Those lawyers made jackpot of lifetime. Federal judge in early 2003 froze processing of all pending pre-2002 applications (except for those who opted-out from lawsuit) until matter is resolved. So, all newer cases started enjoying shorter processing times as a result. Now after settlement has been approved all frozen previously cases are coming back to processing. And will take processing resources as well as visa quotas for few years to come.
Most of those cases didn't have problems, they were not finalized because court order froze their processing for over 2 years.
Those are cases filed prior to 2002 and new law implemented in 2002 made them retroactively subject to new selection criteria. Some of those 130,000 applicants would not qualify under new rules, although not all. But quite few lawyers "smelled blood" (read big money) and filed a class action lawsuit, collecting thousands of $$$ from naive clients mainly in India to have them inclued in the lawsuit, while once it was classified as class action lawsuit all affected were automatically included, unless decided to not participate. Those lawyers made jackpot of lifetime. Federal judge in early 2003 froze processing of all pending pre-2002 applications (except for those who opted-out from lawsuit) until matter is resolved. So, all newer cases started enjoying shorter processing times as a result. Now after settlement has been approved all frozen previously cases are coming back to processing. And will take processing resources as well as visa quotas for few years to come.
Most of those cases didn't have problems, they were not finalized because court order froze their processing for over 2 years.
Originally Posted by sww
I don't understand why didn't they finilize these cases at time, probably because most of them have problems ? or not even qualified to immigrate to canada ?
if not they should have been finilised at time, because of the bring forward date, so they check these files at regular basics ?
i m not trying to act smart here, but isn't this how the system work ?
and i have a question : how do we know that it s 130 000 cases ?
if not they should have been finilised at time, because of the bring forward date, so they check these files at regular basics ?
i m not trying to act smart here, but isn't this how the system work ?
and i have a question : how do we know that it s 130 000 cases ?
#11
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 98
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Dear Miller Sir.
As i applied in New Delhi in 2003 november .....if we count all cases of backlog plus fresh cases when my application will ne given I.A?
in 2010 or....so?
what else way can i go for ????
As i applied in New Delhi in 2003 november .....if we count all cases of backlog plus fresh cases when my application will ne given I.A?
in 2010 or....so?
what else way can i go for ????
#12
Just Joined
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 25
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
As this case was finalised in March 2005, will the extra processing times be factored into any AOR's recently received?
For example, I have just received my AOR from the London office, 2 weeks after posting application, stating a 36 month waiting time. Will this include any extra processing time arising from the finalisation of these cases? Or should I expect to wait more than 36 months.
Thanks
Katy
For example, I have just received my AOR from the London office, 2 weeks after posting application, stating a 36 month waiting time. Will this include any extra processing time arising from the finalisation of these cases? Or should I expect to wait more than 36 months.
Thanks
Katy
Last edited by ktp; Oct 18th 2005 at 9:02 pm.
#13
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 210
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Originally Posted by rahulaustraliamein
Dear Miller Sir.
As i applied in New Delhi in 2003 november .....if we count all cases of backlog plus fresh cases when my application will ne given I.A?
in 2010 or....so?
what else way can i go for ????
As i applied in New Delhi in 2003 november .....if we count all cases of backlog plus fresh cases when my application will ne given I.A?
in 2010 or....so?
what else way can i go for ????
#14
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
As this case was finalised in March 2005, will the extra processing times be factored into any AOR's recently received?
This is the real problem I have: the total lack of communication with applicants about these things. If they'd at least say 'sorry, due to events outside our control your application won't be processed until 2008, not 2006', I could just start arranging a wedding next year, but as it is I have no clue whether I should wait for my skilled worker application to be processed or give up on it. Equally, if I'd known last year what a mess the whole process would be, I'd just have got married then and be in Canada by now.
To be honest, they're only hurting themselves this way. As much as I like Canada, if my girlfriend wasn't Canadian I wouldn't even have considered emigrating there after the way they've treated potential emigrants in the past... and if applicants in the UK now are going to be looking at a five year wait for a visa, the vast majority of the kind of people the government really want to emigrate to Canada are just going to forget about it.
#15
Re: Huge Delay in Buffalo office about 2 to 3 years more
Originally Posted by MarkG
Who knows? Who can tell?
This is the real problem I have: the total lack of communication with applicants about these things. If they'd at least say 'sorry, due to events outside our control your application won't be processed until 2008, not 2006', I could just start arranging a wedding next year, but as it is I have no clue whether I should wait for my skilled worker application to be processed or give up on it. Equally, if I'd known last year what a mess the whole process would be, I'd just have got married then and be in Canada by now.
To be honest, they're only hurting themselves this way. As much as I like Canada, if my girlfriend wasn't Canadian I wouldn't even have considered emigrating there after the way they've treated potential emigrants in the past... and if applicants in the UK now are going to be looking at a five year wait for a visa, the vast majority of the kind of people the government really want to emigrate to Canada are just going to forget about it.
This is the real problem I have: the total lack of communication with applicants about these things. If they'd at least say 'sorry, due to events outside our control your application won't be processed until 2008, not 2006', I could just start arranging a wedding next year, but as it is I have no clue whether I should wait for my skilled worker application to be processed or give up on it. Equally, if I'd known last year what a mess the whole process would be, I'd just have got married then and be in Canada by now.
To be honest, they're only hurting themselves this way. As much as I like Canada, if my girlfriend wasn't Canadian I wouldn't even have considered emigrating there after the way they've treated potential emigrants in the past... and if applicants in the UK now are going to be looking at a five year wait for a visa, the vast majority of the kind of people the government really want to emigrate to Canada are just going to forget about it.