Help on CAIPS
#1
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 420

Dear experts and fellow group members:
I have recently got my CAIPS notes and I need some help in understanding some of the codes. Below are the brief details of my case:
Processing Post: Buffalo
File transferred from India: Feb 2002 (originally applied April 2001)
Received refusal: Jun 2003 (wrongly assessed)
Requested for reconsideration: Jun 2003
Received initial assessment : Dec 2003 with interview waiver and request for medials, RCMP and proof of funds.
Did medicals (spouse and myself) in Canada: Dec 30, 2003 (results reached Ottawa in Jan 2004)
Medicals for my son in India: Jan 2004 (results reached in the same month).
Note: My son underwent open-heart surgery in April 2003 and recovered completely.
Received a letter from Buffalo asking us to do some additional tests on my son: Jan 24, 2004
Additional tests completed in Feb 2004 (results reached in March 2004)
Got a letter from Buffalo to provide updated personal and residence history (for myself) Jan 2003 to present: April 2004
Sent the requested information: April 2004
************************************
Here are some codes from the CAIPS NOTES
************************************
IMMCAT: SW1
PSDEC: 1 (05-12-2003) SELDEC: 4 (05-12-2003)
BDEC : 0 MEDDEC: 0
OREQ : 0 FINDEC: 0
SEC CRI
Self : 3 pouse : 1
Son : 1
Medical
Stage Validity
Self : M01 30-12-2004 pouse : M01 30-12-2004
Son : M03 02-01-2005
Pending BDEC INFO
REC'D UPDATED WORK/RESIDENCE HISTORY FOR PI, PA TO FILE FOR REFERRAL
REFERRAL FOR PI ONLY SENT THIS DATE : MB 04-MAY- 2004.
Since my son got operated and recovered completely I don' t think he will be a burden on Canadian health care system (this was the opinion of the surgeon who performed surgery on my son). Here my question is: is there any possibility that he will be refused on medical grounds? If that is the case, will they refuse all of our cases or just my son's. Anyway, if he is not allowed, then there is no point in accpting the PR for ourselves.
Any help on the above will be greatly apprecaited.
Thanks in advance
Damodar
I have recently got my CAIPS notes and I need some help in understanding some of the codes. Below are the brief details of my case:
Processing Post: Buffalo
File transferred from India: Feb 2002 (originally applied April 2001)
Received refusal: Jun 2003 (wrongly assessed)
Requested for reconsideration: Jun 2003
Received initial assessment : Dec 2003 with interview waiver and request for medials, RCMP and proof of funds.
Did medicals (spouse and myself) in Canada: Dec 30, 2003 (results reached Ottawa in Jan 2004)
Medicals for my son in India: Jan 2004 (results reached in the same month).
Note: My son underwent open-heart surgery in April 2003 and recovered completely.
Received a letter from Buffalo asking us to do some additional tests on my son: Jan 24, 2004
Additional tests completed in Feb 2004 (results reached in March 2004)
Got a letter from Buffalo to provide updated personal and residence history (for myself) Jan 2003 to present: April 2004
Sent the requested information: April 2004
************************************
Here are some codes from the CAIPS NOTES
************************************
IMMCAT: SW1
PSDEC: 1 (05-12-2003) SELDEC: 4 (05-12-2003)
BDEC : 0 MEDDEC: 0
OREQ : 0 FINDEC: 0
SEC CRI
Self : 3 pouse : 1
Son : 1
Medical
Stage Validity
Self : M01 30-12-2004 pouse : M01 30-12-2004
Son : M03 02-01-2005
Pending BDEC INFO
REC'D UPDATED WORK/RESIDENCE HISTORY FOR PI, PA TO FILE FOR REFERRAL
REFERRAL FOR PI ONLY SENT THIS DATE : MB 04-MAY- 2004.
Since my son got operated and recovered completely I don' t think he will be a burden on Canadian health care system (this was the opinion of the surgeon who performed surgery on my son). Here my question is: is there any possibility that he will be refused on medical grounds? If that is the case, will they refuse all of our cases or just my son's. Anyway, if he is not allowed, then there is no point in accpting the PR for ourselves.
Any help on the above will be greatly apprecaited.
Thanks in advance
Damodar
Last edited by reddy_cd; Jul 13th 2004 at 2:47 am.
#2
Hi Reddy
Your son's medical is assessed as M03, which means he passed.
PMM
Originally posted by reddy_cd
Dear experts and fellow group members:
I have recently got my CAIPS notes and I need some help in understanding some of the codes. Below are the brief details of my case:
Processing Post: Buffalo
File transferred from India: Feb 2002 (originally applied April 2001)
Received refusal: Jun 2003 (wrongly assessed)
Requested for reconsideration: Jun 2003
Received initial assessment : Dec 2003 with interview waiver and request for medials, RCMP and proof of funds.
Did medicals (spouse and myself) in Canada: Dec 30, 2003 (results reached Ottawa in Jan 2004)
Medicals for my son in India: Jan 2004 (results reached in the same month).
Note: My son underwent open-heart surgery in April 2003 and recovered completely.
Received a letter from Buffalo asking us to do some additional tests on my son: Jan 24, 2004
Additional tests completed in Feb 2004 (results reached in March 2004)
Got a letter from Buffalo to provide updated personal and residence history (for myself) Jan 2003 to present: April 2004
Sent the requested information: April 2004
************************************
Here are some codes from the CAIPS NOTES
************************************
IMMCAT: SW1
PSDEC: 1 (05-12-2003) SELDEC: 4 (05-12-2003)
BDEC : 0 MEDDEC: 0
OREQ : 0 FINDEC: 0
SEC CRI
Self : 3 pouse : 1
Son : 1
Medical
Stage Validity
Self : M01 30-12-2004 pouse : M01 30-12-2004
Son : M03 02-01-2005
Pending BDEC INFO
REC'D UPDATED WORK/RESIDENCE HISTORY FOR PI, PA TO FILE FOR REFERRAL
REFERRAL FOR PI ONLY SENT THIS DATE : MB 04-MAY- 2004.
Since my son got operated and recovered completely I don' t think he will be a burden on Canadian health care system (this was the opinion of the surgeon who performed surgery on my son). Here my question is: is there any possibility that he will be refused on medical grounds? If that is the case, will they refuse all of our cases or just my son's. Anyway, if he is not allowed, then there is no point in accpting the PR for ourselves.
Any help on the above will be greatly apprecaited.
Thanks in advance
Damodar
Dear experts and fellow group members:
I have recently got my CAIPS notes and I need some help in understanding some of the codes. Below are the brief details of my case:
Processing Post: Buffalo
File transferred from India: Feb 2002 (originally applied April 2001)
Received refusal: Jun 2003 (wrongly assessed)
Requested for reconsideration: Jun 2003
Received initial assessment : Dec 2003 with interview waiver and request for medials, RCMP and proof of funds.
Did medicals (spouse and myself) in Canada: Dec 30, 2003 (results reached Ottawa in Jan 2004)
Medicals for my son in India: Jan 2004 (results reached in the same month).
Note: My son underwent open-heart surgery in April 2003 and recovered completely.
Received a letter from Buffalo asking us to do some additional tests on my son: Jan 24, 2004
Additional tests completed in Feb 2004 (results reached in March 2004)
Got a letter from Buffalo to provide updated personal and residence history (for myself) Jan 2003 to present: April 2004
Sent the requested information: April 2004
************************************
Here are some codes from the CAIPS NOTES
************************************
IMMCAT: SW1
PSDEC: 1 (05-12-2003) SELDEC: 4 (05-12-2003)
BDEC : 0 MEDDEC: 0
OREQ : 0 FINDEC: 0
SEC CRI
Self : 3 pouse : 1
Son : 1
Medical
Stage Validity
Self : M01 30-12-2004 pouse : M01 30-12-2004
Son : M03 02-01-2005
Pending BDEC INFO
REC'D UPDATED WORK/RESIDENCE HISTORY FOR PI, PA TO FILE FOR REFERRAL
REFERRAL FOR PI ONLY SENT THIS DATE : MB 04-MAY- 2004.
Since my son got operated and recovered completely I don' t think he will be a burden on Canadian health care system (this was the opinion of the surgeon who performed surgery on my son). Here my question is: is there any possibility that he will be refused on medical grounds? If that is the case, will they refuse all of our cases or just my son's. Anyway, if he is not allowed, then there is no point in accpting the PR for ourselves.
Any help on the above will be greatly apprecaited.
Thanks in advance
Damodar
PMM
#3
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 420

Hi PMM,
Thank you very much for your reply and it's really a good news.
Could you please comment on our medical assessment (M01) for my spouse and myself?
Also Sec decision for my son and wife is 1, and 3 for me. What does this mean?
I would really appreciate your efforts if you could answer the above two queries.
Once again thanks for your expert advise!
Reddy
Thank you very much for your reply and it's really a good news.
Could you please comment on our medical assessment (M01) for my spouse and myself?
Also Sec decision for my son and wife is 1, and 3 for me. What does this mean?
I would really appreciate your efforts if you could answer the above two queries.
Once again thanks for your expert advise!
Reddy
Originally posted by PMM
Hi Reddy
Your son's medical is assessed as M03, which means he passed.
PMM
Hi Reddy
Your son's medical is assessed as M03, which means he passed.
PMM
#4
Hi
M01 on meds, means passed no problems, the 3 appears that your background check is still outstanding (in progress)
PMM
Originally posted by reddy_cd
Hi PMM,
Thank you very much for your reply and it's really a good news.
Could you please comment on our medical assessment (M01) for my spouse and myself?
Also Sec decision for my son and wife is 1, and 3 for me. What does this mean?
I would really appreciate your efforts if you could answer the above two queries.
Once again thanks for your expert advise!
Reddy
Hi PMM,
Thank you very much for your reply and it's really a good news.
Could you please comment on our medical assessment (M01) for my spouse and myself?
Also Sec decision for my son and wife is 1, and 3 for me. What does this mean?
I would really appreciate your efforts if you could answer the above two queries.
Once again thanks for your expert advise!
Reddy
PMM
#5
Forum Regular


Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 77

Your wife and son passed their Security checks but yours is still ongoing. This security check is done by the Canadian Secret Services.
Here are the definitions of your Medical assessments:
Your wife & You
M1: No health impairment sufficient to prevent admission
Your son
M3: Has a condition for which the potential demand on health or social services is not sufficient to exclude admission, but which risk should be considered in relation to other personal and social criteria.
Hope this helps
Here are the definitions of your Medical assessments:
Your wife & You
M1: No health impairment sufficient to prevent admission
Your son
M3: Has a condition for which the potential demand on health or social services is not sufficient to exclude admission, but which risk should be considered in relation to other personal and social criteria.
Hope this helps
#6
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 420

Hello PMM and Sam,
Thank you very much for your replies and your answers cleared my doubts.
Great job!
Regards
Reddy
Thank you very much for your replies and your answers cleared my doubts.
Great job!
Regards
Reddy
Originally posted by PMM
Hi
M01 on meds, means passed no problems, the 3 appears that your background check is still outstanding (in progress)
PMM
Hi
M01 on meds, means passed no problems, the 3 appears that your background check is still outstanding (in progress)
PMM
#7
Forum Regular



Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 244

hey damodar,
u r almost there buddy ..
hang in there !!!

u r almost there buddy ..
hang in there !!!

Originally posted by reddy_cd
Hello PMM and Sam,
Thank you very much for your replies and your answers cleared my doubts.
Great job!
Regards
Reddy
Hello PMM and Sam,
Thank you very much for your replies and your answers cleared my doubts.
Great job!
Regards
Reddy
#8
Forum Regular


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 53

Hi,
If all of them passed the Medical Examination, why is the MEDDEC 0?
thanks
spas
If all of them passed the Medical Examination, why is the MEDDEC 0?
thanks
spas
#9
Yup, you're almost there.
How long did it take to receive your caips notes? I recently requested one for my friend.
How long did it take to receive your caips notes? I recently requested one for my friend.
Originally posted by yr0000
hey damodar,
u r almost there buddy ..
hang in there !!!
hey damodar,
u r almost there buddy ..
hang in there !!!
#10
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 420

Hi Yr,
Thanks for your reply and encouraging words.
Hi Jeny
I applied for CAIPS on Jun 18, 2004 (reached them on Jun 22) and got them back on July 12, 2004 (letter dated July 6, 2004). I think the processing was pretty fast.
Spas:
No idea, why they keep medical decsion as 0 (I am worried) when there are no issues with regard to them. Maybe they will change it once the security decision is made.
Thanks
Damodar
Thanks for your reply and encouraging words.
Hi Jeny
I applied for CAIPS on Jun 18, 2004 (reached them on Jun 22) and got them back on July 12, 2004 (letter dated July 6, 2004). I think the processing was pretty fast.
Spas:
No idea, why they keep medical decsion as 0 (I am worried) when there are no issues with regard to them. Maybe they will change it once the security decision is made.
Thanks
Damodar
Originally posted by jenyapching
Yup, you're almost there.
How long did it take to receive your caips notes? I recently requested one for my friend.
Yup, you're almost there.
How long did it take to receive your caips notes? I recently requested one for my friend.
#11
Forum Regular


Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 77

The med decision is made by a medical officer in Ottawa. These decisions are then entered into your application by an immigration officer. In the case at hand, the immig officer hasn't updated the file.
#12
Just Joined

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 26
From: USA

for Mr. Miller and other experts can you please help me understand these caips notes:
I Just got the CAIPS notes and got this:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++
Case Status
File: B0XXXXXXX(my number) Client ID: XXXXXXX(Numbers)
Case Type:MISCELLANEOUS
XREF:P1
Total Person: 1
( We are family of four why it say one)
WC Status: ** WC Type:** Decision Reason: **
PSDEC SELDEC
BDEC MEDDEC
OREQ FINDEC
Family Members
(Just show's my name
and not my spose or kids name)
RPRF Not paid
G020700216 found for subj.
==================================RH 12-SEP-2002======
OVERPAYMENT REFUND REQUEST PASSED TO JS
=======================RH 13-SEP-2002 =================
REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT OF PROCESSING FEE, (They did send us refund of $60.00)
====================================GS 01-NOV-2002
FILE TRANSFERRED TO LOS ANGELES FOR PAPERSCREENING
LETTER SENT TO NOTIFY SUBJECT
===================================TM 14-May-2003
NOTES
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
We are family of four 2 kids and me and my spouse then why do they show only my name in members and in Total person (one)
Did they not have entered properly from our application or Does any one got the same thing with family of more then one person
What does above codes mean can some one please help us.
Thanks in advance
I Just got the CAIPS notes and got this:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++
Case Status
File: B0XXXXXXX(my number) Client ID: XXXXXXX(Numbers)
Case Type:MISCELLANEOUS
XREF:P1
Total Person: 1
( We are family of four why it say one)WC Status: ** WC Type:** Decision Reason: **
PSDEC SELDEC
BDEC MEDDEC
OREQ FINDEC
Family Members
(Just show's my name
and not my spose or kids name)RPRF Not paid
G020700216 found for subj.
==================================RH 12-SEP-2002======
OVERPAYMENT REFUND REQUEST PASSED TO JS
=======================RH 13-SEP-2002 =================
REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT OF PROCESSING FEE, (They did send us refund of $60.00)
====================================GS 01-NOV-2002
FILE TRANSFERRED TO LOS ANGELES FOR PAPERSCREENING
LETTER SENT TO NOTIFY SUBJECT
===================================TM 14-May-2003
NOTES
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
We are family of four 2 kids and me and my spouse then why do they show only my name in members and in Total person (one)
Did they not have entered properly from our application or Does any one got the same thing with family of more then one person
What does above codes mean can some one please help us.
Thanks in advance





