Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
#16
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
That's just weird.
As far as the UK is concerned they probably need to edit the country list, as it appears whom ever is adding Data to e-CAS isn't too sure which one to add the applicants under either.
I'm listed in e-CAS as an England applicant (born in England), but based in Portugal, and yet Kaye5 (based in London ) is listed under UK and not England. It is after all, as they say in America (and probably Canada too), London, England
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales clearly all fall under the title United Kingdom and Colonies yet CIC have England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales also listed as a separate countries as well.
Either just list the separate UK country's, or just the UK, but not both!
I feel it would be more correct for United Kingdom and Colonies to read: United Kingdom Colonies.
The rest could then be listed as England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
As far as the UK is concerned they probably need to edit the country list, as it appears whom ever is adding Data to e-CAS isn't too sure which one to add the applicants under either.
I'm listed in e-CAS as an England applicant (born in England), but based in Portugal, and yet Kaye5 (based in London ) is listed under UK and not England. It is after all, as they say in America (and probably Canada too), London, England
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales clearly all fall under the title United Kingdom and Colonies yet CIC have England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales also listed as a separate countries as well.
Either just list the separate UK country's, or just the UK, but not both!
I feel it would be more correct for United Kingdom and Colonies to read: United Kingdom Colonies.
The rest could then be listed as England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
#19
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 56
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
Ha ha!! Just used that genius ECAS tracker tool, and it has found it!! (We have used England and UK before; neither worked...). It is under UK.
Hello,
This is the e-CAS Tracker system at https://ecas.carroll.org.uk
We can now see the details of your application on e-CAS...
Latest update:
"Your application and supporting documents were received by the London
England office. They are pending review."
And direct via ECAS...
We received your application for permanent residence on April 29, 2010.
Your application and supporting documents were received by the London England office. They are pending review.
Phew.
Hello,
This is the e-CAS Tracker system at https://ecas.carroll.org.uk
We can now see the details of your application on e-CAS...
Latest update:
"Your application and supporting documents were received by the London
England office. They are pending review."
And direct via ECAS...
We received your application for permanent residence on April 29, 2010.
Your application and supporting documents were received by the London England office. They are pending review.
Phew.
#21
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Hubley, Nova Scotia (from Scotland via Yorkshire and London)
Posts: 1,190
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
That's just weird.
As far as the UK is concerned they probably need to edit the country list, as it appears whom ever is adding Data to e-CAS isn't too sure which one to add the applicants under either.
I'm listed in e-CAS as an England applicant (born in England), but based in Portugal, and yet Kaye5 (based in London ) is listed under UK and not England. It is after all, as they say in America (and probably Canada too), London, England
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales clearly all fall under the title United Kingdom and Colonies yet CIC have England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales also listed as a separate countries as well.
Either just list the separate UK country's, or just the UK, but not both!
I feel it would be more correct for United Kingdom and Colonies to read: United Kingdom Colonies.
The rest could then be listed as England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
As far as the UK is concerned they probably need to edit the country list, as it appears whom ever is adding Data to e-CAS isn't too sure which one to add the applicants under either.
I'm listed in e-CAS as an England applicant (born in England), but based in Portugal, and yet Kaye5 (based in London ) is listed under UK and not England. It is after all, as they say in America (and probably Canada too), London, England
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales clearly all fall under the title United Kingdom and Colonies yet CIC have England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales also listed as a separate countries as well.
Either just list the separate UK country's, or just the UK, but not both!
I feel it would be more correct for United Kingdom and Colonies to read: United Kingdom Colonies.
The rest could then be listed as England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales
#22
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Nova Scotia (from Scotland)
Posts: 1,032
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
hmmm I wonder if I should try this tracker tool... we were listed on ecas but when all the weirdness started we disappeared from the system entirely and I can't find our record any more. The work PC doesn't seem to want to let me access the tracker so I will give it a go when I get home, see if I can find out anything!
#23
PR living in Vancouver
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 343
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
As you can see by my timeline I hand delivered our app on 8th October, still no AOR as yet but I did get a reply on a case specific email to say we are in a que awaiting review???
Nothing has changed on ECAS.
Who knows the wait continues...
Nothing has changed on ECAS.
Who knows the wait continues...
#24
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
Good thread, puts my mind at rest when those ahead of us haven't had AOR yet. We were very beginning of December.
#27
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
Hi everyone,
Soo glad that this thread was started! We hand delivered our docs to London on 22nd October - lets hope that our AOR is not too far away!!
Good luck to everyone else who is patiently waiting!!
Soo glad that this thread was started! We hand delivered our docs to London on 22nd October - lets hope that our AOR is not too far away!!
Good luck to everyone else who is patiently waiting!!
#28
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Hubley, Nova Scotia (from Scotland via Yorkshire and London)
Posts: 1,190
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
Ooh - another one! Great stuff!
I remember doing this back in October, with all the April 2010 to CIO applicants. All stuck for ages... then once one got 120 day email, they started coming in one after the other.
Let's hope this will be the same and we will see lots of movement this month!!
I remember doing this back in October, with all the April 2010 to CIO applicants. All stuck for ages... then once one got 120 day email, they started coming in one after the other.
Let's hope this will be the same and we will see lots of movement this month!!
#29
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
It actually does more than just check country variations. It'll check all possible combinations of everything you give it. Alternative countries of birth, maiden name+married surname, or alternative spellings, and different identification numbers (e.g. if you have a client ID and also a receipt number).
I'm glad you found it useful, and thanks for spreading the word - it's entirely word-of-mouth.
#30
Re: Docs to London Sept 2010 onwards - anyone got AOR?
That might make for an interesting immigration policy discussion
It actually does more than just check country variations. It'll check all possible combinations of everything you give it. Alternative countries of birth, maiden name+married surname, or alternative spellings, and different identification numbers (e.g. if you have a client ID and also a receipt number).
I'm glad you found it useful, and thanks for spreading the word - it's entirely word-of-mouth.
It actually does more than just check country variations. It'll check all possible combinations of everything you give it. Alternative countries of birth, maiden name+married surname, or alternative spellings, and different identification numbers (e.g. if you have a client ID and also a receipt number).
I'm glad you found it useful, and thanks for spreading the word - it's entirely word-of-mouth.
Thanks for your efforts in creating this tool. I'm not too sure if it won't become redundant later this year when the new system kicks in, but for sure it's done a sterling job so far.