suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
#16
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Of course that is only for grizzly bears. I think in Alberta alone around 4,500 black bears/year are shot. Canada has 400,000-500,000 black bears.
#17
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
You've got me interested now.
This is a good site for numbers in Alberta, dated 2004 though.
http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/bears/present.html
One line I followed took me to some revolting pictures of grinning, gun-toting men proudly showing off the blood-soaked corpses of their latest conquests.
I really cannot see the attraction of causing pain and death for fun.
It's hardly a "fair fight" is it? How can this be sport?
This is a good site for numbers in Alberta, dated 2004 though.
http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/bears/present.html
One line I followed took me to some revolting pictures of grinning, gun-toting men proudly showing off the blood-soaked corpses of their latest conquests.
I really cannot see the attraction of causing pain and death for fun.
It's hardly a "fair fight" is it? How can this be sport?
Last edited by Alberta_Rose; Mar 4th 2006 at 4:18 am.
#18
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
And further, on the subject of danger threat to humans of black bears......
I liked this one:
In "The Great American Bear," author Jeff Fair offers further evidence on the potential threat. For each death caused by black bears, approximately seventeen people in North America have died of spider bites, twenty-five by snakebites, and sixty-seven due to attacks by domestic dogs. According to Fair, "...on the whole you are statistically 374 times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightning than by a black bear."
If that isn't enough, consider this: Humans attack and kill their fellow humans at a rate of over 90,000 times that of black bear manslaughter. So which species is the greater threat?
I liked this one:
In "The Great American Bear," author Jeff Fair offers further evidence on the potential threat. For each death caused by black bears, approximately seventeen people in North America have died of spider bites, twenty-five by snakebites, and sixty-seven due to attacks by domestic dogs. According to Fair, "...on the whole you are statistically 374 times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightning than by a black bear."
If that isn't enough, consider this: Humans attack and kill their fellow humans at a rate of over 90,000 times that of black bear manslaughter. So which species is the greater threat?
#19
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Poland
Posts: 577
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
It sounds like a standard: "Lets find something that is guaranteed to divide the public opinion and make more people hate someone in the name of whatever". The same was done in U.K. over fox hunting. Now in London there is a fox in practically everyone's garden. And while hunting has been banned newspapers now make a point of
showing pictures of scores of dead foxes shot by Golf Club wardens. 'Cause that is just o.k. So what was the clamor all about then? I guess fox hunters were not
nice enough people to be allowed to pursue their tradition.
…And while I remember: What about 1000's of cows that were killed and burnt in open fields all over Britain a while ago as a "Prevention" from Foot and Mouth disease? That had full Media approval. Is that not similar to shooting bears to prevent attacks on people?
Animals are NOT people. They were created FOR people. While killing anything for fun is contemptible and e.g. Hinduism is very good at enshrining that there is no reason at all to say that man killing an animal to control its population is a criminal.
showing pictures of scores of dead foxes shot by Golf Club wardens. 'Cause that is just o.k. So what was the clamor all about then? I guess fox hunters were not
nice enough people to be allowed to pursue their tradition.
…And while I remember: What about 1000's of cows that were killed and burnt in open fields all over Britain a while ago as a "Prevention" from Foot and Mouth disease? That had full Media approval. Is that not similar to shooting bears to prevent attacks on people?
Animals are NOT people. They were created FOR people. While killing anything for fun is contemptible and e.g. Hinduism is very good at enshrining that there is no reason at all to say that man killing an animal to control its population is a criminal.
#20
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 101
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by oceanMDX
Shall I get a male or a female grizzly bear rug for you?
#21
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by Morwenna
And further, on the subject of danger threat to humans of black bears......
I liked this one:
In "The Great American Bear," author Jeff Fair offers further evidence on the potential threat. For each death caused by black bears, approximately seventeen people in North America have died of spider bites, twenty-five by snakebites, and sixty-seven due to attacks by domestic dogs. According to Fair, "...on the whole you are statistically 374 times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightning than by a black bear."
If that isn't enough, consider this: Humans attack and kill their fellow humans at a rate of over 90,000 times that of black bear manslaughter. So which species is the greater threat?
I liked this one:
In "The Great American Bear," author Jeff Fair offers further evidence on the potential threat. For each death caused by black bears, approximately seventeen people in North America have died of spider bites, twenty-five by snakebites, and sixty-seven due to attacks by domestic dogs. According to Fair, "...on the whole you are statistically 374 times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightning than by a black bear."
If that isn't enough, consider this: Humans attack and kill their fellow humans at a rate of over 90,000 times that of black bear manslaughter. So which species is the greater threat?
http://safety.eas.ualberta.ca/field/...m#Distribution
http://www.achannel.ca/wingham/news_15701.aspx
Every year several people are mauled by bears in Canada. In Alberta, black bears come out of their dens around mid May.
#22
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 101
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by iaink
Anyone see "Grizzly Man"?
#23
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by Balzac
Female. Then I can think about her motherless bear cubs every time I see her!
#24
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by oceanMDX
All the above is rather meaningless...
Every year several people are mauled by bears in Canada. In Alberta, black bears come out of their dens around mid May.
Every year several people are mauled by bears in Canada. In Alberta, black bears come out of their dens around mid May.
Neither am I on a ban hunting rant per se. It was really an observation that I could not personally see what the attraction is of killing things for amusement, any more than I can see the attraction of smoking, for instance. In my opinion, both stink , but I don't lecture people to give up smoking either, so long as they don't do it in my face.
However, I do take issue with the poster who maintains that animals were put on earth for our use (or mis-use). Live and let live is my motto as far as is practical. Animals act out of instinct, by and large. Humans are supposed to be above that.
#25
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by savefuel
Yep..teaching the bears to write was a good move.
#26
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
The attraction to hunting isn't about the joy of blowing something away. I really enjoy moose meat... have you ever tasted moose jerky? It's delicious... hunting can be very challenging... and it can be an enjoyable social event with friends. I enjoyed learning the ways of the targetted species and being out in the bush. Some hunters do it largely for a trophy and will let scores of "unworthy" deer pass right by them until the "right" one passes by.
Hunters and their associations in Canada have actually had a big role to play in conservation. Their license fees support Government conservation efforts. Hunting associations even have lotteries that pay for the reintroduction of elk (and other species) into parts of Canada that can support them.
Hunters and their associations in Canada have actually had a big role to play in conservation. Their license fees support Government conservation efforts. Hunting associations even have lotteries that pay for the reintroduction of elk (and other species) into parts of Canada that can support them.
#27
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Yes ok. It's like the the majority of fox-hunters in UK who never got to see a fox half the time, but just enjoyed the social aspect and the excitement of the chase I suppose.
I eat meat, though I haven't tasted moose. The only meat I don't eat on conscientious objector grounds is veal.
Hunting wouldn't light my candle personally, but I can see the attraction of the meets, and the nice walks and tracking and WATCHING these animals. The only thing I'd want to shoot them with would be a camera though.
I eat meat, though I haven't tasted moose. The only meat I don't eat on conscientious objector grounds is veal.
Hunting wouldn't light my candle personally, but I can see the attraction of the meets, and the nice walks and tracking and WATCHING these animals. The only thing I'd want to shoot them with would be a camera though.
#28
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by Morwenna
Yes ok. It's like the the majority of fox-hunters in UK who never got to see a fox half the time, but just enjoyed the social aspect and the excitement of the chase I suppose.
I eat meat, though I haven't tasted moose. The only meat I don't eat on conscientious objector grounds is veal.
Hunting wouldn't light my candle personally, but I can see the attraction of the meets, and the nice walks and tracking and WATCHING these animals. The only thing I'd want to shoot them with would be a camera though.
I eat meat, though I haven't tasted moose. The only meat I don't eat on conscientious objector grounds is veal.
Hunting wouldn't light my candle personally, but I can see the attraction of the meets, and the nice walks and tracking and WATCHING these animals. The only thing I'd want to shoot them with would be a camera though.
A lot of hunters also get interested in the wilderness survival end of it too. All can be very interesting. You might even consider getting involved with hunting/fishing associations even if you don't intend to hunt or fish since you will gain so much knowledge about wildlife. Go to your local conservation office (Government of Alberta) and take their maps and booklets. Tell them you want to learn about Alberta wildlife.
#29
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,071
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Well all this talk about Bears and seals....I wish someone would come and get rid of my coyotes....yes they are a problem. Maybe we should have a coyote cull!!!
#30
Re: suspension of alberta grizzly hunt
Originally Posted by Balzac
I did. What a whacko! He actually made the bears less safe by habituating them to humans.