Which is quicker for PR?
#1
Which is quicker for PR?
Buffalo or London? (from inside Canada). I really have to start the application now and I am so bogged under with reading material I can't cope with trying to find out the answer to this by trying to trail round so I am hoping one or more of you lovely people will help me....
Thanks gang xxx
Thanks gang xxx
#2
Re: Which is quicker for PR?
Buffalo or London? (from inside Canada). I really have to start the application now and I am so bogged under with reading material I can't cope with trying to find out the answer to this by trying to trail round so I am hoping one or more of you lovely people will help me....
Thanks gang xxx
Thanks gang xxx
On the other hand I've heard in London it takes 4 or 5 years, honestly If I'd had to apply in London I would opt to go as a provincial from new foundland or Quebec
#3
Re: Which is quicker for PR?
Buffalo or London? (from inside Canada). I really have to start the application now and I am so bogged under with reading material I can't cope with trying to find out the answer to this by trying to trail round so I am hoping one or more of you lovely people will help me....
Thanks gang xxx
Thanks gang xxx
Think that probably London would be your best option - am sure that there was a thread a month or so ago and am sure that Andrew had said that London was quicker for cases like ours Ki ie already there on a WP.
Dont think that Masi knew you were there on a WP. 4 - 5 years is for a normal PR application you know with arranged employment etc.
less that two weeks to go hun woo hoo
Gaynor
x
#4
Re: Which is quicker for PR?
Hi Babe
Think that probably London would be your best option - am sure that there was a thread a month or so ago and am sure that Andrew had said that London was quicker for cases like ours Ki ie already there on a WP.
Dont think that Masi knew you were there on a WP. 4 - 5 years is for a normal PR application you know with arranged employment etc.
less that two weeks to go hun woo hoo
Gaynor
x
Think that probably London would be your best option - am sure that there was a thread a month or so ago and am sure that Andrew had said that London was quicker for cases like ours Ki ie already there on a WP.
Dont think that Masi knew you were there on a WP. 4 - 5 years is for a normal PR application you know with arranged employment etc.
less that two weeks to go hun woo hoo
Gaynor
x
And yay, bring on the hols!! xx
#5
Re: Which is quicker for PR?
Once you are over there and can submit letter from Si's employer stating that the employment will be permanent once he has gained PR then they will expedite it.
Well that is the gyst of it from where I am sitting and the way Phil and i will go.
Most inland PR's take 12-18 months
See you in 12 days hun
An all dancing singing Gaynor
#6
Re: Which is quicker for PR?
hey Ki
Once you are over there and can submit letter from Si's employer stating that the employment will be permanent once he has gained PR then they will expedite it.
Well that is the gyst of it from where I am sitting and the way Phil and i will go.
Most inland PR's take 12-18 months
See you in 12 days hun
An all dancing singing Gaynor
Once you are over there and can submit letter from Si's employer stating that the employment will be permanent once he has gained PR then they will expedite it.
Well that is the gyst of it from where I am sitting and the way Phil and i will go.
Most inland PR's take 12-18 months
See you in 12 days hun
An all dancing singing Gaynor