|
Re: McCartney / Seal Cull
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
Sentinel?? as in standing guard?
If we didnt eat animals would there be a reason for pigs and sheep? a few might be kept as pets, but would there be feral ones? living a "natural" life? its all about balance and we need to live alongside animals, and not torture them as part of food prodcution, this doesn't preclude good animal husbandry to feed us. I dont know where i stand on the seal killing -, i know we wouldnt be as interested if they werent cute. Personally i am not sure about the integrity of heather, she has a vivid imagination, and Paul seems to like to be told what to think. The argument about meat production for those who don't care about animal welfare should centre on it being a very wasteful method of producing protein for humans to consume. The planet would probably be a better place without the suffering inflicted upon animals and humans in westernised food production. If we are "the superior" beings claimed by some posters than surely we have a responsibility to so called "lesser" beings as well as our grandchildren. I can remember a HUGE rally in the late 70's through London protesting about Seal clubbing, nothings changed there.. |
Re: McCartney / Seal Cull
Originally Posted by willmore
You're leaving? ;)
|
Re: McCartney / Seal Cull
Originally Posted by Hudman
The planet would probably be a better place without the suffering inflicted upon animals and humans in westernised food production.
|
Re: McCartney / Seal Cull
Originally Posted by dingbat
Bit like alcohol free beer and wine. Utterly pointless. How's your head?
|
Re: McCartney / Seal Cull
Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
A-ok! Fell asleep midway through the third bottle (party animal!!!). That probably saved me. :)
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:08 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.