first tax return
#17










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











For most people that's all that's required if using some software package - although I wouldn't trust an accountant who only charges that much.
Last edited by Alan2005; Jan 16th 2013 at 10:23 am.
#18
Binned by Muderators










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC











The question is: do the costs of the medicals, plus any other medical expenses for the year exceed the lower of 3% of either spouse's net income or $2,052? If so, and that spouse paid tax, then it is worth filing. If the lower earning spouse did not pay tax but the expenses exceed the lower of 3% of the higher earner's net income or $2,052, then it is worth that person filing for an adjustment.
#20
I did my hubbys for him the other year and calculated somewhere around $6k return. He didn't believe me, so took it to H&R block where they worked out it was around $4k.
Smiling like a man with a gobful of tic tacs he took great pleasure in telling me how wrong I was.
Some 4 months later revenue Canada sent him a cheque for an extra $2k (ish) for things that had been missed from the return.
It's the little things in life hey
To this day I refuse to do his taxes
Smiling like a man with a gobful of tic tacs he took great pleasure in telling me how wrong I was.
Some 4 months later revenue Canada sent him a cheque for an extra $2k (ish) for things that had been missed from the return.
It's the little things in life hey

To this day I refuse to do his taxes
#21
I took our tax forms to a chartered accountancy firm the first two years that cost over $250 for the both so us. Upon recommendation, I took them to a small local family run business and our refunds were no less than that given when we filed using a CA. Excellent job and $35 well spent indeed!
#22
I did my hubbys for him the other year and calculated somewhere around $6k return. He didn't believe me, so took it to H&R block where they worked out it was around $4k.
Smiling like a man with a gobful of tic tacs he took great pleasure in telling me how wrong I was.
Some 4 months later revenue Canada sent him a cheque for an extra $2k (ish) for things that had been missed from the return.
It's the little things in life hey
To this day I refuse to do his taxes
Smiling like a man with a gobful of tic tacs he took great pleasure in telling me how wrong I was.
Some 4 months later revenue Canada sent him a cheque for an extra $2k (ish) for things that had been missed from the return.
It's the little things in life hey

To this day I refuse to do his taxes

#23
I dont think I could take my chances with someone who only charges $35. You get what you pay for
#24
Just because a rural family company has far less overheads and charges accordingly, doesn't mean the job gets done any different than big city accountants.
I would also urge newbies to get a professional to do your first year's taxes so you are well aware of all that can be claimed and what receipts you should be keeping. Even if you do them yourself next time, at least you have a hard copy 'Template' to keep you on track the following year.
Last edited by Cookie; Jan 17th 2013 at 1:03 am.
#25
As I said above, the taxes were done in the same way and the results were comparable. Easy to compare the hard copies when you keep them yourself. I just drop off our envelope of documents and pick them up the following week. Job done for $35 each!
Just because a rural family company has far less overheads and charges accordingly, doesn't mean the job gets done any different than big city accountants.
I would also urge newbies to get a professional to do your first year's taxes so you are well aware of all that can be claimed and what receipts you should be keeping. Even if you do them yourself next time, at least you have a hard copy 'Template' to keep you on track the following year.
Just because a rural family company has far less overheads and charges accordingly, doesn't mean the job gets done any different than big city accountants.
I would also urge newbies to get a professional to do your first year's taxes so you are well aware of all that can be claimed and what receipts you should be keeping. Even if you do them yourself next time, at least you have a hard copy 'Template' to keep you on track the following year.
But like you say, you are happy, its comparable. I am just not sure it would be the same for someone that needs anything vaguely complex involved - like a house still in the UK for example.
#26
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,040
From: Orton, Ontario











For our first return we used an accountant (pretty sure he charged more than $35 - but it wasn't much) it was worth it for the peace of mind and getting all the pro rating etc sorted. After that it was easy to file ourselves using one of the software packages mentioned above. I am self employed now so back to the accountant for me but hubby still files his own.
#29
Binned by Muderators










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC











No, anywhere in the world as long as the doctor is licensed to practice in the country where the medical procedure takes place. However, you can't claim for medical expenses incurred before you become tax-resident in Canada.
#30
It should not trigger an audit, it is just that it gives them one more chance to look over a return they have already put to bed. If you are going to get some tax back then good, otherwise there is no benefit to you.
The question is: do the costs of the medicals, plus any other medical expenses for the year exceed the lower of 3% of either spouse's net income or $2,052? If so, and that spouse paid tax, then it is worth filing. If the lower earning spouse did not pay tax but the expenses exceed the lower of 3% of the higher earner's net income or $2,052, then it is worth that person filing for an adjustment.
The question is: do the costs of the medicals, plus any other medical expenses for the year exceed the lower of 3% of either spouse's net income or $2,052? If so, and that spouse paid tax, then it is worth filing. If the lower earning spouse did not pay tax but the expenses exceed the lower of 3% of the higher earner's net income or $2,052, then it is worth that person filing for an adjustment.
I noticed that one of the options in Turbotax for 2012 is to enter medical expenses incurred in 2011 but not claimed then. Could the PR medical expenses be added to the 2012 tax assessment? (There is already quite a high figure for medical expenses for 2012 - approx $4.3k.)



