British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   Canada (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/)
-   -   Exchange rate (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/exchange-rate-442788/)

edinburgh May 11th 2007 2:11 am

Re: Exchange rate
 
hi

just thought i would let you know i spoke with moneycorp and hifix this afternoon as i have just registered with them.

both agents thought we would do well to see 2.25 more likley 2.0 , with their price coming in today at 2.18

this is for a small amount , and from reading before i understand the larger the amount the difference reduces.

Andthen May 11th 2007 3:00 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by edinburgh (Post 4766346)
hi

just thought i would let you know i spoke with moneycorp and hifix this afternoon as i have just registered with them.

both agents thought we would do well to see 2.25 more likley 2.0 , with their price coming in today at 2.18

this is for a small amount , and from reading before i understand the larger the amount the difference reduces.

The larger the amount, the more you need to worry about the difference in exchange rate, on say £50,000 the difference between 2.25 & 2.20 is enormous.

steve666 May 11th 2007 3:02 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir (Post 4766326)
Are we taking conventional or oil sands?

In the case of the latter, Alberta's reserves are reckoned to be sufficient to supply all world demand for oil for over a century.

I was talking both, I was reading that Canada is second only to Saudi Arabia in the oil reserve stakes. But this includes the Alberta sands where the extraction/production is expensive and difficult in relation to the former. So I'm not sure why someone would give 2012 as a year for expected oil reserve depletion to occur.

If what you say is true why in the name of god am I landing in Ottawa when it's Alberta I should be heading.

KennyJosie May 11th 2007 3:12 am

Re: Exchange rate
 
Taken from the Telegraph website
"City experts yesterday warned that the Bank of England may follow yesterday's quarter percentage point increase in interest rates with another hike, as fresh figures showed one in three new pay deals is worth more than 4pc.............................Economists warned that there was an increasing chance that the Bank will lift borrowing costs again to 5.75pc, although this would become clearer next week after the publication of its latest Inflation Report."
So how would this effect the $$ per £?
Cheers,
Kenny

gryphea May 11th 2007 3:17 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by steve666 (Post 4766239)
Ahh, ignore him for the moment, he's having a bad day.
Anyway, enough of this tribalism, can we go back to my post on Canadian oil and how long it's going to last? Much more interesting.

<<So what's the timeline, given the information available, for Canadian oil supplies to dwindle to a trickle and set off economic calamity? There was an article in the Enomomist a while ago (maybe years, I can't remember) that cited 2012 to be the year of impending doom for oil exporting countries.>>

I'm just worried for the poor people in Alberta.

A lot longer than 2012. They have huge reserves (I am a geologist so not based entirely on fiction), but I think (and I could be wrong- I often am) whether or not they count as reserves at any particular time depends upon the price per barrel at the time, as oil is costly to extract from the sands. However as a secure non middle eastern supplier to the US I would think their (the oil reserves) future is fairly secure. I have however heard mutterings (from mate at Shell who was talking about gas) that Alberta (or maybe Canada) may put some sort of extra tax which makes the market insecure for them for investment

Gryphea

Gryphea

gryphea May 11th 2007 3:23 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by steve666 (Post 4766503)
I was talking both, I was reading that Canada is second only to Saudi Arabia in the oil reserve stakes. But this includes the Alberta sands where the extraction/production is expensive and difficult in relation to the former. So I'm not sure why someone would give 2012 as a year for expected oil reserve depletion to occur.

If what you say is true why in the name of god am I landing in Ottawa when it's Alberta I should be heading.


Here is a reasonable assessment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_Tar_Sands
Reserves depend upon ease/cost of extraction, so if new methods of recovery are devised instantly the reserves can go up instantly

cneldred May 11th 2007 3:29 am

Re: Exchange rate
 
if you have GBP£ to change into CAD$ you want either BOE to keep hiking rates or Bank of Canada to cut rates.

steve666 May 11th 2007 3:49 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by gryphea (Post 4766581)
Here is a reasonable assessment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_Tar_Sands
Reserves depend upon ease/cost of extraction, so if new methods of recovery are devised instantly the reserves can go up instantly

Cheers gryphea, I've looked at Wikipedia for the info before but couldn't get an answer on the reserve depletion thing. Better handle on it now, as they say. Thanks.

Souvenir May 11th 2007 4:03 am

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by gryphea (Post 4766555)
A lot longer than 2012. They have huge reserves (I am a geologist so not based entirely on fiction), but I think (and I could be wrong- I often am) whether or not they count as reserves at any particular time depends upon the price per barrel at the time, as oil is costly to extract from the sands. However as a secure non middle eastern supplier to the US I would think their (the oil reserves) future is fairly secure. I have however heard mutterings (from mate at Shell who was talking about gas) that Alberta (or maybe Canada) may put some sort of extra tax which makes the market insecure for them for investment

Gryphea

Gryphea

I can't see the province imposing a nasty tax. The feds, on the other hand, will tax anything they can. You are, of course, right about the price issue. The existence of the oil sands has been known about for ages. For many years they were just resources because the oil price was too low to make recovery economically viable. These days, recovery is most certainly a nice little earner.

masiosare May 11th 2007 1:29 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by Andthen (Post 4766497)
The larger the amount, the more you need to worry about the difference in exchange rate, on say £50,000 the difference between 2.25 & 2.20 is enormous.

I believe you should act now, I don't think it would go above 2.3, it may go below 2.2 however, so I'd act quickly

Or else just exchange some of the money to minimize the risk

Andthen May 11th 2007 4:25 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 

Originally Posted by masiosare (Post 4768892)
I believe you should act now, I don't think it would go above 2.3, it may go below 2.2 however, so I'd act quickly

Or else just exchange some of the money to minimize the risk

I'd agree.

cneldred May 11th 2007 7:58 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 
i would agree with that aswell.

steve666 May 11th 2007 10:10 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 
And me.

Biiiiink May 12th 2007 1:43 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 
I can't stop peeking at this thread. Please help me. End it now ;)

lilacheart May 12th 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Exchange rate
 
I am like a moth with a nice bright light......


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:21 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.