Elementary Schools
#31
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 173
From: Fredericton, NB









Yes and my parents read with me every day but if you have a 6 year old who is barely literate in an elementary reading class that is basically follow along with the class while teacher reads then that child is going to get frustrated, board and disruptive. It's even worse when it's a stand up and read a passage aloud style class and you end up crying because you can't even manage a line. What good is that to anyone?
#32
Yes and my parents read with me every day but if you have a 6 year old who is barely literate in an elementary reading class that is basically follow along with the class while teacher reads then that child is going to get frustrated, board and disruptive. It's even worse when it's a stand up and read a passage aloud style class and you end up crying because you can't even manage a line. What good is that to anyone?
Is this hypothetical 6 year old kid barely literate because of some physical or mental developmental issues, or is it because the parents have never spent any time helping the kid outside of school and just dump them in front of the idiot box to keep them quiet and out from under their feet? Different solutions in those two extremes I suspect.
#33
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 173
From: Fredericton, NB









None at all (other than to highlite the problem that needs addressing), clearly the child needs additional help. But is it reasonable to expect a teacher in those circumstances to be focusing the time necessary on that one kids at the expense of the others?
Is this hypothetical 6 year old kid barely literate because of some physical or mental developmental issues, or is it because the parents have never spent any time helping the kid outside of school and just dump them in front of the idiot box to keep them quiet and out from under their feet? Different solutions in those two extremes I suspect.
Is this hypothetical 6 year old kid barely literate because of some physical or mental developmental issues, or is it because the parents have never spent any time helping the kid outside of school and just dump them in front of the idiot box to keep them quiet and out from under their feet? Different solutions in those two extremes I suspect.
Is it reasonable to expect a teacher with a class that size to set aside time for one child? no, certainly not. My point was that in a private school setting where class sizes are so much smaller, every child gets to have one on one time, the teacher gets to know them and can gear that time to help them develop any areas that might be lacking whether it's reading or maths or spelling etc...
#34
Well in my case as the barely literate 6 year old it was because I was dyslexic and my teachers at the state school who had 35 others to handle decided and repeatedly told my parents I was slow and probably not very intelligent and that I might pick it up eventually. I was then dumped at the back of the class with the other 'slow' and 'naughty' children.
Is it reasonable to expect a teacher with a class that size to set aside time for one child? no, certainly not. My point was that in a private school setting where class sizes are so much smaller, every child gets to have one on one time, the teacher gets to know them and can gear that time to help them develop any areas that might be lacking whether it's reading or maths or spelling etc...
Is it reasonable to expect a teacher with a class that size to set aside time for one child? no, certainly not. My point was that in a private school setting where class sizes are so much smaller, every child gets to have one on one time, the teacher gets to know them and can gear that time to help them develop any areas that might be lacking whether it's reading or maths or spelling etc...
I think awareness of learning disabilities like dyslexia and autism is a lot higher now than 20 or 30 years ago, certainly among teachers and hopefully among parents too. It helps of course if parents are fully engaged with their kids though. It doesnt really matter if a kid is dyslexic or autistic or "normal", the more time a teacher can spend with them the better. Its not more appropriate for a teacher to have no time to help a dyslexic child then it is to ignore the "smart" kids who get under-stimulated and bored for want of more challenging stuff to do.
Last edited by iaink; Jul 16th 2010 at 7:40 am.
#35
BE Forum Addict









Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,059











Sorry, dont have any stats, just direct experience based on the kids of two friends who went to UofT (dentistry) and waterloo (chem eng) both of whom reported that their straight A valedictorian kids were finding it really hard, to the point one dropped out and one just squeaked past 1st year exams.
These arent partying kids either, so its not a sudden lot of distraction that was making it hard for them compared to the prep school prepared kids, the university expected them to have already covered some of the calculus and physics and chemistry, but despite graduating high school with high GPAs, they had not covered those topics.
These arent partying kids either, so its not a sudden lot of distraction that was making it hard for them compared to the prep school prepared kids, the university expected them to have already covered some of the calculus and physics and chemistry, but despite graduating high school with high GPAs, they had not covered those topics.
Several of my high school friends went to Waterloo. Most did well, but a few didn't.
#36
Well, people must be thinking that private schools are offering something to justify the price tag. If it is not French then it should be something else.
During my research I also found out that price of housing in the neighbourhood and ranking of schools are also closely interrelated. There is also definetely a correlation between household income and the quality of elementary school. The quality of schools is evaluated by GTA elementary school board by ranking their academic performance. There seems to be some other parameters that affect the ranking of schools such as 2nd language spoken at home and ethnicity in the neighborhood.
Generally if the household income is high and English is the first language spoken at home then the school is ranked fairly high. Probably the only anomaly I found in this statistical data is the existance of a few Chinese neighbourhoods with low household income and high percentage of 2nd language spoken at home other than English. This probably can be explained by high emphasis on education in Chinese culture.
Still the trend is very obvious. Rich neighbourhoods, good schools. There is also the fact that people can only send the kids to the state school in their neighbourhood and nowhere else.
So, can it be the case that some people are making an economic desicion whether to overpay for a house where there is a good school or pay considerably less for a similar house in a different neighbourhood and instead send their children to a private school.
During my research I also found out that price of housing in the neighbourhood and ranking of schools are also closely interrelated. There is also definetely a correlation between household income and the quality of elementary school. The quality of schools is evaluated by GTA elementary school board by ranking their academic performance. There seems to be some other parameters that affect the ranking of schools such as 2nd language spoken at home and ethnicity in the neighborhood.
Generally if the household income is high and English is the first language spoken at home then the school is ranked fairly high. Probably the only anomaly I found in this statistical data is the existance of a few Chinese neighbourhoods with low household income and high percentage of 2nd language spoken at home other than English. This probably can be explained by high emphasis on education in Chinese culture.
Still the trend is very obvious. Rich neighbourhoods, good schools. There is also the fact that people can only send the kids to the state school in their neighbourhood and nowhere else.
So, can it be the case that some people are making an economic desicion whether to overpay for a house where there is a good school or pay considerably less for a similar house in a different neighbourhood and instead send their children to a private school.
During my research I also found out that price of housing in the neighbourhood and ranking of schools are also closely interrelated.
This is absolutely true. We've just been through the process and moved to the city three weeks ago with our 6 and 3 year old. I went on a recce at the end of May and posted my findings on BE about this only to get shot down and accused of being a real estate agent (i'm not). If you want any advice on this, please PM me.
Just from the outset I would say that Toronto has a LOT of very good public elementary schools so don't think you need to go private or pretend you're a catholic to give your child a good education here (well, ok, my son hasn't started so shouldn't speak too soon ...). If you land a postcode in the district of a school your child can 100% attend that school. You can apply for optional attendance elsewhere but that is very competitive for the better schools. You are likely to spend more in the city for rent if your house is in the district of a better or ' F1' school (cannot comment on purchasing).
Apart from TDSB, an excellent website to consult is this one: http://ontario.compareschoolrankings...y/Default.aspx. It allows you to select an area you like and then see what the good and bad schools are within a 5km radius. Very helpful.
Anyway, PM me if you like.
Last edited by London Mike; Jul 16th 2010 at 4:57 pm.
#37
Ps the other thing to say is that there is a notional cap of 20 kids per class in many of the schools I visited -- but this varies. So, this is much less than the typical 30+ where we were in London.
Even if the class is at 20, though, they HAVE to accept your child if you have the postcode for that school district. Think that's different from the UK, at least from where we were in London too.
Even if the class is at 20, though, they HAVE to accept your child if you have the postcode for that school district. Think that's different from the UK, at least from where we were in London too.
#38
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55

Thanks Mike. Fraser report is a good tool. It will help me immensely.
#39
slanderer of the innocent










Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC











The FI report is not a great tool, the CD Howe report is better because it takes out socioeconomic factors and gives a better sense of how a school is actually doing.
http://www.thespec.com/article/620286
http://www.thespec.com/article/620286
#40
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55

Thanks Kiwilass, good info. its more apples to apples comparison.





