Area suggestions!
#61
I've googled this as it appeals to the useless information centre of my brain. The altar is located in the east part of the church for Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, Roman Catholic, and Anglican churches. They are not facing Jerusalem in the same way that Muslims face Mecca or Jews face Jerusalem when praying.
#62
limey party pooper










Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 10,000











I wonder if this has more to do with early morning light from the East window illuminating the Matins service, and the evening light coming through the West window at Vespers. It would be a bit crappy to have a North-South aligned church with all the light struggling through the smaller windows of the aisles and transepts.
#64
Banned


Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 97











LOL, OK Rich.
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much. Here's one way to define middle class: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/pu...dex-march-2013
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much. Here's one way to define middle class: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/pu...dex-march-2013
Last edited by Dulciusexasperis; Mar 14th 2014 at 3:30 am.
#65
Banned


Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 97











Dbd33, yes, the suburbs elected him. That's where the working class live. That's who suburbs are built to house.
#66
LOL, OK Rich.
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much.
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much.
Just think - nine posts a day now and rising. Just think what El Dulci could achieve with ten!
#67
Banned


Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 97











You spend your time checking on how many times a day someone posts rivington? Fascinating information.
#68
It's almost a calling.
#69
Regardless of housing types, Ford represents greed and ignorance, he's Steven Harper with better hair. These are not qualities of the working class but of the aspirational middle class, the salesmen, not the tram drivers.
And, on another point, the middle class is that mass of people who do not work with their hands, do not draw benefit and are not members of the upper class. "Rich" is just middle class with a bigger house. Conrad Black is, I suppose, at the pinnacle of Canadian society, he's rich, he's a social climber, but he can never be a member of the upper class. Colonial parvenu is the best status open to him.
Last edited by dbd33; Mar 14th 2014 at 3:57 am.
#70
That statistic is available in one of the profile thingies; do you work it out and update everyone's profile each day?
#72
Your definition of 'in the sticks' has no relevance to me, or the context of your original assumptions concerning class attitudes towards finances.
You say middle class is nearly impossible to define, yet you've tried to define people you don't know in neighbourhoods you don't know on several occasions. Class seems to be quite important to you. You've created sub classes of middle class, then subsequently stated middle class doesn't exist in your mind. You seem quite confused.
You say middle class is nearly impossible to define, yet you've tried to define people you don't know in neighbourhoods you don't know on several occasions. Class seems to be quite important to you. You've created sub classes of middle class, then subsequently stated middle class doesn't exist in your mind. You seem quite confused.
LOL, OK Rich.
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much. Here's one way to define middle class: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/pu...dex-march-2013
"You're illustrating an ignorance about Kamloops. In the sticks? Hardly, I was still in city limits. Downtown was under 20 minutes away."
I don't mean this in any derogatory way but you are illustrating an ignorance about Canada. Anywhere outside a major city is 'in the sticks'. Kamloops is 'in the sticks' to a Vancouverite for example and anywhere west of the Humber River is 'in the sticks' to a Torontonian. That includes Vancouver. The only place Kamloops is not in the sticks from is from within Kamloops.
Middle class is nearly impossible to define. It's something that most people define themselves as being and obviously some of them must be wrong. The only thing you can get agreement on is 'rich'. That's the people earning in the top 1%. Here's an interesting article on middle class in which someone earning $120k doesn't feel it's enough to maintain a middle class lifestyle. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle15515586/
Personally, I only see two classes. Working class and rich. Trying to differentiate within working class really doesn't mean much. Here's one way to define middle class: https://www.policyalternatives.ca/pu...dex-march-2013




