Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia > The Barbie
Reload this Page >

Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Wikiposts

Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 6:27 am
  #106  
Account Open
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,298
From: Brisbane
asprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by northerner
So how does it work?
Try reading some books and finding out ! I'm no scientist.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 7:45 am
  #107  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by northerner
...
I don't want to get into any arguement but you're quoting kid's novelists - don't get me wrong I've no doubt they're very intelegent people. But that's it - intelegent people who write childrens books.
...
I dispute that Science of Diskworld books are kids' novels (and we can agree to disagree on that as it is irrelevant) but even if they were this does not make the information wrong. I did try to point out twice that this information has been available in a number of sources for a while but you seem to be ignoring that.

It appears that you have a problem firstly because your information on evolution was wrong (hence the petulant google slur) and secondly because your level of knowledge on evolution does not even make it up to the standard found in a "kids' novel" (your words).

Last edited by MartinLuther; Feb 21st 2008 at 8:58 am.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 8:05 am
  #108  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by burtreynoldsisonit
Lol "Martin Luther aint dissin yo religion son!"

No I'm not saying you are taking shots at religion. I'm talking in a braoder sense where generalised statements are made about it. Lets face it, the majority of people know more about science than religion. Most people know the nitrogen cycle but couldn't name all 10 commandments. I was probably mistaken to say that was scientific belief as popular is more appropriate. Still having said that, evolution is the popular belief now. Ya dig?
You do realise Martin Luther was German, Mein Mann?

Although science does get it wrong (or partially wrong) from time to time: Phlogiston and the Ether being prime examples, dark matter and repulsive gravity being potential future examples these hypotheses are eventual weeded out. Science is a human endeavour and is prone to the frailties of human emotion and desire. This is why the scientific method came about. It tries to temper the human aspects.

This to me is the beauty of science whilst others seem to be uncomfortable that it does not come up with a belief and then stick to it. I find the religious equivalents unsatisfactory. The trinity is the prevalent belief in Christianity not because it’s been tested over the years but because the Arians were persecuted and killed off. Similar differences of opinion have led to splits in the other major religions.

I, like any good scientist accept the possibility that evolution could be wrong but there needs to be sufficient evidence to prove that it’s wrong. In my opinion Evolution along with the 2 theories on Relativity are the strongest theories in science today. There seems to be no evidence against them (other than fabricated misunderstandings) and they have all been good at making predictions which have been proved experimentally.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 8:34 am
  #109  
asher's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,690
From: in the Sydney asylum
asher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

If anyone is really interested why not do an open university course
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 8:57 am
  #110  
Account Open
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,298
From: Brisbane
asprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond reputeasprilla has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by asher
If anyone is really interested why not do an open university course
now that would be too sensible.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 9:01 am
  #111  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316
MartinLuther is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

and expensive for someone with just a interest in the subject
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 9:53 am
  #112  
Aussie lost in the UK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 682
From: Terrigal, NSW Central Coast
AndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by burtreynoldsisonit
If a car could not just happen, a human being could just not happen. If a car needed consious thought from a designer to be created, a human being needed consious thought from a designer to be created.

No offence, but thats a silly argument....

a lump of metal - is just that, a lump of metal, it does not need to eat or breeed or survive - so it has no reason to ever alter - so a lump of metal will never evolve - NOTHING that is an inert object evolves.....

Animals and plants evolve because they have to to survive! thats how evolution happens.

A car is a group of inert objects put together by humans - it is not an organic living thing and has no place in discussion about evolution...


Its like saying a cake is put together and takes thought....therefore humans require thought...

Not saying your point about intelligent design is invalid..... just saying don't use inert non-living objects to compare to living organisms

apples and apples please
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 10:07 am
  #113  
esperanza's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,383
From: 'stralia
esperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by AndyR1976
No offence, but thats a silly argument....

a lump of metal - is just that, a lump of metal, it does not need to eat or breeed or survive - so it has no reason to ever alter - so a lump of metal will never evolve - NOTHING that is an inert object evolves.....

Animals and plants evolve because they have to to survive! thats how evolution happens.

A car is a group of inert objects put together by humans - it is not an organic living thing and has no place in discussion about evolution...


Its like saying a cake is put together and takes thought....therefore humans require thought...

Not saying your point about intelligent design is invalid..... just saying don't use inert non-living objects to compare to living organisms

apples and apples please
Ah, unless you had a situation a la I Robot, where the machines begin to repair & reproduce themselves, and then you could argue that they were evolving. Another excellent movie.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 10:18 am
  #114  
northerner's Avatar
Suncream, I need suncream
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,316
From: Sydney
northerner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond reputenortherner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by esperanza
Ah, unless you had a situation a la I Robot, where the machines begin to repair & reproduce themselves, and then you could argue that they were evolving. Another excellent movie.
In fact isn't there some scientists now saying that computers/robots will be more intelligent than humans in 100 years or something?? I read something about it the other day - it's all a bit Terminator.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 10:48 am
  #115  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,225
Nerine is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Could happen! they're already attaching rat embryo neurons to chips to understand how memory forms, work is also being done on developing super fast chips that use photons rather than electrical charge.

Perhaps mankind's ultimate evolution is to be able to replicate itself as a biomechanical organism? Does that then mean we're destined to become Gods?

Last edited by Nerine; Feb 21st 2008 at 10:50 am.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 11:31 am
  #116  
esperanza's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,383
From: 'stralia
esperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by Nerine
Could happen! they're already attaching rat embryo neurons to chips to understand how memory forms, work is also being done on developing super fast chips that use photons rather than electrical charge.

Perhaps mankind's ultimate evolution is to be able to replicate itself as a biomechanical organism? Does that then mean we're destined to become Gods?
I don't know, is God a biomechanical organism?

Could get a bit overcrowded if we stopped dying.... might need a whole new system of applying to have offspring, or applying to have your life extended again based on how useful you have been recently.... Weird!

(Can't think of a movie analogy for this one.... there should be one though! I will get on to twentieth century fox right away! )
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 11:37 am
  #117  
Aussie lost in the UK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 682
From: Terrigal, NSW Central Coast
AndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by northerner
In fact isn't there some scientists now saying that computers/robots will be more intelligent than humans in 100 years or something?? I read something about it the other day - it's all a bit Terminator.
Oh for God's sake....

If we are going down the computer evolution thing then the best example ios modren day computer viruses...

Some viruses re-write themselves on the fly to overcome antiu-virus software and to make themselves less detecatable to searches etc.....

Hasta la Vista baby.....
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 11:38 am
  #118  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,225
Nerine is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Esperanza the nearest film I can think of is "AI".

What is really missing from the traditional theory of evolution is quantum mechanics, is evolution merely increasing disorder?

Last edited by Nerine; Feb 21st 2008 at 11:47 am.
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 11:41 am
  #119  
esperanza's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,383
From: 'stralia
esperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond reputeesperanza has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by Nerine
Nearest film I can think of is "AI"
Nice one! Can't believe I missed that!!
 
Old Feb 21st 2008 | 1:10 pm
  #120  
Aussie lost in the UK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 682
From: Terrigal, NSW Central Coast
AndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond reputeAndyR1976 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Theory of Evolution: Seriously??

Originally Posted by esperanza
Nice one! Can't believe I missed that!!
What about Short Circuit - that movie from the 1980's where the robot (number 5) starts to learn and has feelings etc....
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.