Theory of Evolution: Seriously??
#107
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

It appears that you have a problem firstly because your information on evolution was wrong (hence the petulant google slur) and secondly because your level of knowledge on evolution does not even make it up to the standard found in a "kids' novel" (your words).
Last edited by MartinLuther; Feb 21st 2008 at 8:58 am.
#108
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

Lol "Martin Luther aint dissin yo religion son!"
No I'm not saying you are taking shots at religion. I'm talking in a braoder sense where generalised statements are made about it. Lets face it, the majority of people know more about science than religion. Most people know the nitrogen cycle but couldn't name all 10 commandments. I was probably mistaken to say that was scientific belief as popular is more appropriate. Still having said that, evolution is the popular belief now. Ya dig?
No I'm not saying you are taking shots at religion. I'm talking in a braoder sense where generalised statements are made about it. Lets face it, the majority of people know more about science than religion. Most people know the nitrogen cycle but couldn't name all 10 commandments. I was probably mistaken to say that was scientific belief as popular is more appropriate. Still having said that, evolution is the popular belief now. Ya dig?


Although science does get it wrong (or partially wrong) from time to time: Phlogiston and the Ether being prime examples, dark matter and repulsive gravity being potential future examples these hypotheses are eventual weeded out. Science is a human endeavour and is prone to the frailties of human emotion and desire. This is why the scientific method came about. It tries to temper the human aspects.
This to me is the beauty of science whilst others seem to be uncomfortable that it does not come up with a belief and then stick to it. I find the religious equivalents unsatisfactory. The trinity is the prevalent belief in Christianity not because it’s been tested over the years but because the Arians were persecuted and killed off. Similar differences of opinion have led to splits in the other major religions.
I, like any good scientist accept the possibility that evolution could be wrong but there needs to be sufficient evidence to prove that it’s wrong. In my opinion Evolution along with the 2 theories on Relativity are the strongest theories in science today. There seems to be no evidence against them (other than fabricated misunderstandings) and they have all been good at making predictions which have been proved experimentally.
#109
If anyone is really interested why not do an open university course
#111
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

and expensive for someone with just a interest in the subject
#112
Aussie lost in the UK





Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 682
From: Terrigal, NSW Central Coast











No offence, but thats a silly argument....
a lump of metal - is just that, a lump of metal, it does not need to eat or breeed or survive - so it has no reason to ever alter - so a lump of metal will never evolve - NOTHING that is an inert object evolves.....
Animals and plants evolve because they have to to survive! thats how evolution happens.
A car is a group of inert objects put together by humans - it is not an organic living thing and has no place in discussion about evolution...
Its like saying a cake is put together and takes thought....therefore humans require thought...
Not saying your point about intelligent design is invalid..... just saying don't use inert non-living objects to compare to living organisms
apples and apples please
#113
No offence, but thats a silly argument....
a lump of metal - is just that, a lump of metal, it does not need to eat or breeed or survive - so it has no reason to ever alter - so a lump of metal will never evolve - NOTHING that is an inert object evolves.....
Animals and plants evolve because they have to to survive! thats how evolution happens.
A car is a group of inert objects put together by humans - it is not an organic living thing and has no place in discussion about evolution...
Its like saying a cake is put together and takes thought....therefore humans require thought...
Not saying your point about intelligent design is invalid..... just saying don't use inert non-living objects to compare to living organisms
apples and apples please
a lump of metal - is just that, a lump of metal, it does not need to eat or breeed or survive - so it has no reason to ever alter - so a lump of metal will never evolve - NOTHING that is an inert object evolves.....
Animals and plants evolve because they have to to survive! thats how evolution happens.
A car is a group of inert objects put together by humans - it is not an organic living thing and has no place in discussion about evolution...
Its like saying a cake is put together and takes thought....therefore humans require thought...
Not saying your point about intelligent design is invalid..... just saying don't use inert non-living objects to compare to living organisms
apples and apples please
#114
#115







Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,225

Could happen! they're already attaching rat embryo neurons to chips to understand how memory forms, work is also being done on developing super fast chips that use photons rather than electrical charge.Perhaps mankind's ultimate evolution is to be able to replicate itself as a biomechanical organism? Does that then mean we're destined to become Gods?
Last edited by Nerine; Feb 21st 2008 at 10:50 am.
#116
Could happen! they're already attaching rat embryo neurons to chips to understand how memory forms, work is also being done on developing super fast chips that use photons rather than electrical charge.Perhaps mankind's ultimate evolution is to be able to replicate itself as a biomechanical organism? Does that then mean we're destined to become Gods?

Could get a bit overcrowded if we stopped dying.... might need a whole new system of applying to have offspring, or applying to have your life extended again based on how useful you have been recently.... Weird!
(Can't think of a movie analogy for this one.... there should be one though! I will get on to twentieth century fox right away!
)
#117
Aussie lost in the UK





Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 682
From: Terrigal, NSW Central Coast











If we are going down the computer evolution thing then the best example ios modren day computer viruses...
Some viruses re-write themselves on the fly to overcome antiu-virus software and to make themselves less detecatable to searches etc.....
Hasta la Vista baby.....
#118







Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,225

Esperanza the nearest film I can think of is "AI".
What is really missing from the traditional theory of evolution is quantum mechanics, is evolution merely increasing disorder?
What is really missing from the traditional theory of evolution is quantum mechanics, is evolution merely increasing disorder?
Last edited by Nerine; Feb 21st 2008 at 11:47 am.




