This is sh*t
#16
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348











Probably Congolese on loan to him from Mugabe's Zimbabwe in return for oil
#17
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348











To be honest..i say leave them to it. It is their country, their problem. We lost our eldest son in Afghanistan July 2009 and did his loss and the UK's intervention help? Did it sh.te. We have lost more brave boys and still there is no end in sight. We can't leave or the fallen have been lost for nothing. As to new problems, I totally agree, we should stay well clear.

Completely agree that the West should steer well clear
#19
One of the many reasons we want to move to Oz for a resh start. Not to forget...that will never happen, but in honour of his memory, do the things he also wanted to do. It is no secret I have been trying to get to Oz for some time but things have not quite worked out. This time it will...it has to.
#20
Banned










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348











Thanks.
One of the many reasons we want to move to Oz for a resh start. Not to forget...that will never happen, but in honour of his memory, do the things he also wanted to do. It is no secret I have been trying to get to Oz for some time but things have not quite worked out. This time it will...it has to.
One of the many reasons we want to move to Oz for a resh start. Not to forget...that will never happen, but in honour of his memory, do the things he also wanted to do. It is no secret I have been trying to get to Oz for some time but things have not quite worked out. This time it will...it has to.
Good luck to you and your family, mate.
#22
The only external intervention that would have any possibility of success would be Arab forces under a UN flag. However this is unlikely to happen as a lot of the Arab nations are dealing with their own civil rest, are too small, or are led by autocrats who would not want to rock the boat as they might be next.
#23
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

The only external intervention that would have any possibility of success would be Arab forces under a UN flag. However this is unlikely to happen as a lot of the Arab nations are dealing with their own civil rest, are too small, or are led by autocrats who would not want to rock the boat as they might be next.
There seems to be an assumption that these events are all the people against all parts of government, which is pretty obviously nonsense.
Just for arguments sake, lets say that NATO managed to get large scale forces on the ground in Libya. They are then faced by a large demonstration in favour of the the Government, with attacks on anti-government supporters... what would you expect them to do?
Wade in on the side of the anti-government people.. or sit back and watch?
Last edited by iamthecreaturefromuranus; Feb 20th 2011 at 8:47 am.
#24
Just out of interest, and this isn't directed at you in particular but any posters who think 'we' should 'do something'..... 'do something' against who exactly?
There seems to be an assumption that these events are all the people against all parts of government, which is pretty obviously nonsense.
Just for arguments sake, lets say that NATO managed to get large scale forces on the ground in Libya. They are then faced by a large demonstration in favour of the the Government, with attacks on anti-government supporters... what would you expect them to do? Wade in on the side of the anti-government people.. or sit back and watch?
There seems to be an assumption that these events are all the people against all parts of government, which is pretty obviously nonsense.
Just for arguments sake, lets say that NATO managed to get large scale forces on the ground in Libya. They are then faced by a large demonstration in favour of the the Government, with attacks on anti-government supporters... what would you expect them to do? Wade in on the side of the anti-government people.. or sit back and watch?

As well as carrying a high possibility of failure the legitimacy of external intervention is always suspect.
Last edited by Rambi; Feb 20th 2011 at 8:47 am.
#25
I guess one reason why some western governments might get involved is to try and prevent a scenario where tens of thousands of Libyans end up setting sail across the Mediterranean towards Europe. I don't think they will though.
#26
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

Italy already has that problem with Tunisians and Libyans WILL start coming. Europe's reaction to this will be interesting.
#28
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188

Governments in France, Italy and Spain are about to face some tough decisions about what to do with thousands of migrants from North Africa. Italy already has some serious issues with economic migrants from Africa, breakdown of government in those countries will see a surge in that, potentially in the tens of thousands.
#29
No doubt it'll be swept under the international carpet just as TIananmen and the events of the June the fourth were... In the interests of economic peace....
And countless other atrocities...
Or is this what usa is looking for as a next step in their master plan for world domination????
Wait wAtch and see
And countless other atrocities...
Or is this what usa is looking for as a next step in their master plan for world domination????
Wait wAtch and see
I'm happy that the US are the only world power right now because the alternatives are not pretty.
#30
Agree, very sad. Good luck Oz wannabe1 in your move.
Lets see what the outcomes could be, Status Quo, Islamic Republic, another "Strongman" or full democracy. The last one is the least likely IMO.
Not much the west could do, it would end up like Northern Ireland, or Iraq. Troops arriving to protect locals quickly seen as "occupying force" and the enemy.
Lets see what the outcomes could be, Status Quo, Islamic Republic, another "Strongman" or full democracy. The last one is the least likely IMO.
Not much the west could do, it would end up like Northern Ireland, or Iraq. Troops arriving to protect locals quickly seen as "occupying force" and the enemy.



