Rolf Harris
#331
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Rolf Harris
Indeed, I think we decided this [rusty razor blade] when it happened to my daughter. My views have either mellowed with the passage of time or I've become a grown up able to see the bigger picture. My worry with the far right "Kill 'em all" scenario is that it won't stop with paedophiles. The next group of extremists will want the same for one punch "king hit" deaths, the next for drink drivers & so on & so forth.
Then we end up in a warped Niemöller cliché
First they came for the Paedophiles and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Paedophile
Then they came for the Rapists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Rapist.
Then they came for the Drink Drivers, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Drink driver.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Then we end up in a warped Niemöller cliché
First they came for the Paedophiles and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Paedophile
Then they came for the Rapists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Rapist.
Then they came for the Drink Drivers, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Drink driver.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Saying that does not make someone 'obviously in favour of old men and young girls in a sexual relationship'. It is simply irrelevant to this discussion.
#332
Re: Rolf Harris
I've got a teenage daughter and would be horrified if a grown man was interested in her sexually.
Something isn't irrelevant to a discussion just because you disagree with it.
Last edited by Kapri; Jul 9th 2014 at 8:35 pm.
#334
Re: Rolf Harris
I said I found something contemptible, not illegal and you told me my view was irrelevant to the discussion.
I know what is and isn't legal, this discussion hasn't been just about that.
Legal or not, I would find a 40 year old man having sex with a 17 year old girl contemptible.
#335
Banned
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: Rolf Harris
I agree, the 17/40 year old scenario doesn't seem right - even though it's legal. It would raise my eyebrows and I'd be deeply concerned too if my 17 year old son began a sexual relationship with a 40 year old woman.
Last edited by paulry; Jul 9th 2014 at 10:06 pm.
#336
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Rolf Harris
This makes no sense.
I said I found something contemptible, not illegal and you told me my view was irrelevant to the discussion.
I know what is and isn't legal, this discussion hasn't been just about that.
Legal or not, I would find a 40 year old man having sex with a 17 year old girl contemptible.
I said I found something contemptible, not illegal and you told me my view was irrelevant to the discussion.
I know what is and isn't legal, this discussion hasn't been just about that.
Legal or not, I would find a 40 year old man having sex with a 17 year old girl contemptible.
I was simply trying to clarify some issues around paedophilia.
You then seemed to be saying that I approved of the older man/young woman scenario.
Whatever I think of it is not the issue, as it is not illegal in the UK, which is what we're talking about with Rolf Harris.
I don't really understand why you're getting angry with me.
#337
Re: Rolf Harris
Actually stevenglish1 and to be fair to MoneyPenny20, I reported a line from one of your posts to the Oz mods, via the report button. So you do her a dis-service as her post was not stand alone with the observation.
This is what you wrote to AndyRich666.
Even as I read it again now, it still reads to me that you are insulting this poster by suggesting he is morally unsavory & that is putting it mildly.
Just posting this to straighten up the idea that MP20 posted a low blow , which she did not.
This is what you wrote to AndyRich666.
Originally Posted by stevenglish1
...mate if you don't have a problem with 12 yearold girls getting screwed in Mexico then I would suggest you don't have a problem with it full stop
Just posting this to straighten up the idea that MP20 posted a low blow , which she did not.
#338
Re: Rolf Harris
Yet a lot of Europe would disagree with you: In Austria, Italy and Germany the age of consent is 14; in Sweden, France and Denmark it is 15.
These are not 3rd world countries with a problem like Mexico - It's widely held that the Mexican age of consent was introduced to mask the problem of underage sex - but progressive western democracies where the rights of women are respected.
In terms of social acceptance, it may be considered unsavoury, but it's certainly still very legal.
S
#339
Re: Rolf Harris
Yet a lot of Europe would disagree with you: In Austria, Italy and Germany the age of consent is 14; in Sweden, France and Denmark it is 15.
These are not 3rd world countries with a problem like Mexico - It's widely held that the Mexican age of consent was introduced to mask the problem of underage sex - but progressive western democracies where the rights of women are respected.
In terms of social acceptance, it may be considered unsavoury, but it's certainly still very legal.
S
These are not 3rd world countries with a problem like Mexico - It's widely held that the Mexican age of consent was introduced to mask the problem of underage sex - but progressive western democracies where the rights of women are respected.
In terms of social acceptance, it may be considered unsavoury, but it's certainly still very legal.
S
There is no one age of consent throughout the world.
But there is a big difference between two 15 olds legally having sex and a 40 year old and a 15 year old having sex.
#340
Re: Rolf Harris
Firstly because I didn't ever say that sex with a 17 year old was an example of paedophilia and secondly because you appeared to say that my view was irrelevant.
#342
Re: Rolf Harris
Just to add complexity to the issue, there are definitely a fair few 18YO's out there that are less mentality mature and capable than the average 14YO. I think the fixation on chronological age is where this whole age difference thing starts to unravel.
We need a new system.... especially between the ages of 14/19
We need a new system.... especially between the ages of 14/19
#343
Re: Rolf Harris
Just to add complexity to the issue, there are definitely a fair few 18YO's out there that are less mentality mature and capable than the average 14YO. I think the fixation on chronological age is where this whole age difference thing starts to unravel.
We need a new system.... especially between the ages of 14/19
We need a new system.... especially between the ages of 14/19
#344
Re: Rolf Harris
But when you have a system, there will always be some statistical outliers - they won't be common, but they will inevitably be there, and the legal position simply cements it.
However unpalatable it may appear, if legislation exists that allow it, then it can happen, though will remain a statistically small incident/event.
S
#345
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Rolf Harris
I don't agree that we need a new system. An 18 year old should be treated like an adult. There are plenty of vunerable people of all ages. Child abuse laws should be for protecting children. Vulnerable/immature people from other ages groups require special consideration and I believe they currently get that.