|
Oh my, that's unfortunate!
I did chuckle but possibly it's not funny :blink: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339270,00.html
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
:blink:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
I'm not a surgeon, but how the hell do you give someone a new anus?
In fact, any orifice. Vaginas, earholes, nostrils etc, they've all got to be connected to something I assume. Did they sew up her 'old' anus?:eek: and reconnected the new one to the errr 'plumbing'. JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Well they made a right arse of that, didn't they?
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Surgery — Several different surgical procedures can help alleviate fecal incontinence. These procedures include direct repair of damaged sphincters, reinforcement of anorectal structures, implantation of artificial sphincters, and muscle transfer procedures.
Surgical repair can reduce or resolve incontinence, particularly for women who develop a tear in the external anal sphincter during childbirth and people with injury of the sphincter due to surgery or other causes. Surgery cures incontinence in 80 percent of women with childbirth-related sphincter tears. In people who have irreparable damage of the sphincters, muscles can be transferred from other areas of the body, usually the leg or buttock, and surgically placed around the anal canal. These muscles mimic the action of the damaged sphincters. Some transferred muscles may require constant electrical stimulation to maintain a contracted state. Muscle transfer surgery can restore continence in up to 73 percent of people. An alternative to a transferred muscle is a synthetic anal cuff that can be inflated to hold back feces and deflated to allow bowel movements. However, this type of procedure is only performed in specialized centers. Complications can occur even in when they are performed by experts. (nicked off a web site I googled can't be arsed to put the link on... ) |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Bummer :ohmy:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
I'd love to know how they explained it to her when she came round in recovery :rofl:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
thats her on the left.:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088565)
I'd love to know how they explained it to her when she came round in recovery :rofl:
"We have good news and bad news. The bad news is your leg operation was a failure. The good news is you won't shit yourself worrying about it". |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088565)
I'd love to know how they explained it to her when she came round in recovery :rofl:
Next time we'll fix your leg, honest. (unless we notice you need a boob job or a fanny refresh) JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Bix
(Post 6088585)
Something like this....
"We have good news and bad news. The bad news is your leg operation was a failure. The good news is you won't shit yourself worrying about it".
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6088586)
I really must stop giving serious answers about this, but if I was the surgeon, I'd have said: we were looking at your leg problem, when we noticed your arse urgently needed a bit of work. So we gave you a new arsehole.
Next time we'll fix your leg, honest. (unless we notice you need a boob job or a fanny refresh) JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Oh that's really shitty for her, isn't it?
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Dorothy
(Post 6088827)
Oh that's really shitty for her, isn't it?
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088662)
Oh dear, I just snorted very loudly :ohmy: Not attractive but at least I'm alone :rofl:
Oh and we'll give him an extra arse while we're at it.:p JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6088586)
I really must stop giving serious answers about this, but if I was the surgeon, I'd have said: we were looking at your leg problem, when we noticed your arse urgently needed a bit of work. So we gave you a new arsehole.
Next time we'll fix your leg, honest. (unless we notice you need a boob job or a fanny refresh) JTL Oh Bum!!! This is really awful, but I can't stop laughing at the responses:rofl: |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
I can't imagine ever wanting to hear I need a fanny refresh :ohmy::rofl:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088948)
I can't imagine ever wanting to hear I need a fanny refresh :ohmy::rofl:
(Jeez I'm sounding like Stephen Fry on QI now) It removes all the good bacteria as well as the bad stuff, so you are more vunerable to fanny infection afterwards. JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6088977)
Its called a douche in the US. And apparently its not actually that good for your front bottom..
(Jeez I'm sounding like Stephen Fry on QI now) It removes all the good bacteria as well as the bad stuff, so you are more vunerable to fanny infection afterwards. JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088989)
Is that something to do with Yakult (sp)?:blink: Yoghurt is very good for thrush, maybe that is as well.
Even douches (american style) how do they do it? Such a weird concept. And yoghurt, well :p, just rub it on and lick it off. |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6089003)
I have no idea, how does it work?:confused: You rub yakult on your...
Even douches (american style) how do they do it? Such a weird concept. And yoghurt, well :p, just rub it on and lick it off. |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088948)
I can't imagine ever wanting to hear I need a fanny refresh :ohmy::rofl:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6089021)
I'm not that flexible :blink::ohmy:
Apparently they only need one vertebrae removed from their spine, and they would be able to pleasure themselves. Of course that would mean no work would ever get done! :p JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6088540)
I'm not a surgeon, but how the hell do you give someone a new anus?
In fact, any orifice. Vaginas, earholes, nostrils etc, they've all got to be connected to something I assume. Did they sew up her 'old' anus?:eek: and reconnected the new one to the errr 'plumbing'. JTL The article didn't mention a new anus. The situation is unforgivable. This article demonstrates why it's so important that there are loads of name/patient checks done on each and every patient. You'd be amazed at the number of patients who say "yes", when you ask "Mrs Jones?" when they are Miss Smith or Mr Evans!! I had one patient who answered yes, of course I did my next check which is to ask their date of birth, they gave a different one, so then I checked their wrist band details. Completely wrong patient. The checks worked. I wasn't bothered. Because the double/triple checking mechanism worked. Pt went ballistic because I was going to take blood from the wrong patient. No I wasn't - we were at least two steps away from that. The checks worked. The wrong Pt disagreed. We agreed to disagree. (At one stage, we had two kids with the same name, same age, same birth month on the ward who were being operated on, on the same day!! Boy was everyone super-aware of that!!) |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Ozzidoc
(Post 6089094)
Sigh.
The article didn't mention a new anus. The situation is unforgivable. This article demonstrates why it's so important that there are loads of name/patient checks done on each and every patient. You'd be amazed at the number of patients who say "yes", when you ask "Mrs Jones?" when they are Miss Smith or Mr Evans!! I had one patient who answered yes, of course I did my next check which is to ask their date of birth, they gave a different one, so then I checked their wrist band details. Completely wrong patient. The checks worked. I wasn't bothered. Because the double/triple checking mechanism worked. Pt went ballistic because I was going to take blood from the wrong patient. No I wasn't - we were at least two steps away from that. The checks worked. The wrong Pt disagreed. We agreed to disagree. (At one stage, we had two kids with the same name, same age, same birth month on the ward who were being operated on, on the same day!! Boy was everyone super-aware of that!!) |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by I_Will_Freckle
(Post 6089237)
Oh forget all that! Tell us about the smelly fannies.
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088469)
I did chuckle but possibly it's not funny :blink: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339270,00.html
she'll be the " Butt" of some jokes now |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088469)
I did chuckle but possibly it's not funny :blink: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339270,00.html
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Bix
(Post 6088585)
Something like this....
"We have good news and bad news. The bad news is your leg operation was a failure. The good news is you won't shit yourself worrying about it". |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 6088586)
I really must stop giving serious answers about this, but if I was the surgeon, I'd have said: we were looking at your leg problem, when we noticed your arse urgently needed a bit of work. So we gave you a new arsehole.
Next time we'll fix your leg, honest. (unless we notice you need a boob job or a fanny refresh) JTL |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
I bet she felt like the bottom had fallen out of her world :ohmy:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Kapri
(Post 6090031)
I bet she felt like the bottom had fallen out of her world :ohmy:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by I_Will_Freckle
(Post 6089237)
Oh forget all that! Tell us about the smelly fannies.
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 6088469)
I did chuckle but possibly it's not funny :blink: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339270,00.html
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Ozzidoc
(Post 6091273)
They are actually few and far between!
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by I_Will_Freckle
(Post 6091307)
Wide? :unsure:
|
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Ozzidoc
(Post 6091349)
No. But it is interesting to discover just how little some women know about their own bodies.....like being married, in their 20s, having their first Pap smear, and being told by the Dr that they actually have 2 vaginas and 2 cervices.
Coat ... |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Ozzidoc
(Post 6091349)
No. But it is interesting to discover just how little some women know about their own bodies.....like being married, in their 20s, having their first Pap smear, and being told by the Dr that they actually have 2 vaginas and 2 cervices.
Any lucky lady with more than one clit? WHAT??? I'm only asking out of scientific interest. |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Vim Fuego
(Post 6091357)
This would explain it, my wife have been giving me her second-class cervix.
Coat ... |
Re: Oh my, that's unfortunate!
Originally Posted by Vim Fuego
(Post 6091357)
This would explain it, my wife have been giving me her second-class cervix.
Coat ... |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:34 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.