![]() |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 10222313)
28
But GB has absolutely rocketed... what this tells me is that Australia is at the bottom of a cycle...it's like one of their tanking AFL teams....but there's no draft picks in Olympic sports....:) |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
A question - why do Bronze and Silver stand either side of Gold? Why don't they have it like steps so Bronze stand on the left with the lowest step, then Silver up a bit and then Gold on the highest? Wouldn't that make more sense? Don't know why that just occurred to me but it's irritating me now. :lol:
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222479)
A question - why do Bronze and Silver stand either side of Gold? Why don't they have it like steps so Bronze stand on the left with the lowest step, then Silver up a bit and then Gold on the highest? Wouldn't that make more sense? Don't know why that just occurred to me but it's irritating me now. :lol:
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by commonwealth
(Post 10222504)
this post belongs to the London 2012 Whingeing Thread. i reported this post to the moderator.
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222479)
A question - why do Bronze and Silver stand either side of Gold? Why don't they have it like steps so Bronze stand on the left with the lowest step, then Silver up a bit and then Gold on the highest? Wouldn't that make more sense? Don't know why that just occurred to me but it's irritating me now. :lol:
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by Scubaemma
(Post 10222518)
I think I read somewhere that originally only the gold medal person was meant to be higher, and the silver and bronze were meant to be the same level either side of gold (which they seem to have gone back to now, I noticed the silver isn't slightly higher than the bronze these days like it used to). So I guess then it wouldn't make sense to have them like steps going up to gold?
:thumbup: |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222479)
A question - why do Bronze and Silver stand either side of Gold? Why don't they have it like steps so Bronze stand on the left with the lowest step, then Silver up a bit and then Gold on the highest? Wouldn't that make more sense? Don't know why that just occurred to me but it's irritating me now. :lol:
I may be wrong but can't be arsed to google:o |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222479)
A question - why do Bronze and Silver stand either side of Gold? Why don't they have it like steps so Bronze stand on the left with the lowest step, then Silver up a bit and then Gold on the highest? Wouldn't that make more sense? Don't know why that just occurred to me but it's irritating me now. :lol:
I sound like I know this already don't I? Sounds impressive doesn't it? Well it isn't, it came up on Radio 5 live the other night. |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10222652)
Its been the same since the 1930's, the IOC felt that the gold medal should stand above the others but silver and bronze should only be superseded by gold, not each other and its never changed.
I sound like I know this already don't I? Sounds impressive doesn't it? Well it isn't, it came up on Radio 5 live the other night. |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222665)
Fair enough, merci buckets. You could have not told me you heard it, I would have been very impressed, now, well not so much. :lol:
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10222670)
How about if I told you I bathed in urine? Hmmm? How about then? Hmm?
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222679)
:rofl: Sorry, even Al is out of the window now, I've just been watching Tom Daley and David Beckham. Yes I'm fickle.
|
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 10222533)
Maybe it's camera angles for TV. They can get all the people in shot easier if Bronze and Silver are moreorless framing the Gold....
:thumbup: |
Re: The London 2012 Olympic Thread
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 10222679)
:rofl: Sorry, even Al is out of the window now, I've just been watching Tom Daley and David Beckham. Yes I'm fickle.
http://memorabilia.london2012.com/iS...uctionId=19831 |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:02 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.