![]() |
Re: iPad
Can they get the marketing right or will it be another Betamax - ie better than VHS but failed due to not getting enough of a market.
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8507319)
For 3 months yes. Makes no difference because the specs of the 4th gen iPhone still doesn't come close to the HTC Desire. Every review is touting it as the best smart phone on the market. And apparently the HTC Sense UI is the dogs bollocks.
As for Nokia. They have the N900 which is running Maemo Linux and Maemo looks set to become the standard OS for Nokia phones. This will be a serious competitor to Android. |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 8508703)
Can they get the marketing right or will it be another Betamax - ie better than VHS but failed due to not getting enough of a market.
|
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 8508703)
Can they get the marketing right or will it be another Betamax - ie better than VHS but failed due to not getting enough of a market.
I think that Google have got the right approach with the open nature of the Android system. By releasing the reliance on a particular piece of hardware, they are trying to do the same thing that Mircrosoft did with the IBM Compatible PC - make the software completely hardware independent. We have already seen Android being adopted on phones, netbooks, tablets, televisions and set-top boxes. If apple started licencing iPhoneOS to other hardware manufacturers, then that may be a different matter, but unfortunately Job's paranoid and controlling attitude towards Apple's technology is likely to constrict and limit their market. I think it's a very similar situation to Acorn Computers back in the 80's/90s - technically superior products, with an awesome OS, but jealously guarded and incredibly hardware dependent. It's no wonder that Microsoft was able to dominate the [particularly education] market - users could go out and buy a cheap clone IBM PC, and not have to buy expensive proprietary hardware. They are interesting times, but I think that the open nature of Android for both software and hardware developers gives it the edge over Apple's paranoia. S |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 8508778)
I think it's a very similar situation to Acorn Computers back in the 80's/90s - technically superior products, with an awesome OS, but jealously guarded and incredibly hardware dependent. It's no wonder that Microsoft was able to dominate the [particularly education] market - users could go out and buy a cheap clone IBM PC, and not have to buy expensive proprietary hardware.
|
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 8507079)
A brave prediction but I hear it is good. Telstra have it exclusively from April for 3 months. Not a way to get mass market.
HTML Code:
[url]http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.25045[/url] |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8508899)
Steve Jobs hasn't learnt from history.
|
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by EvannTel
(Post 8509295)
Except that Apple's market share is increasing albeit slowly, it is getting there.
Not the case in Australia but Australia is 10 years behind the rest of the world anyway. |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8509331)
Actually no it's not. If you look at market share of iPhone vs Android in the US you will find that iPhone sales have diminished and Andriod has just overtaken it. On top of that there are a few tablets about to be released that will compete with the iPad, are technically superior and look set to blow that away as well.
Not the case in Australia but Australia is 10 years behind the rest of the world anyway. I think for that reason iPad will succeed - no doubt there will be technically better products in both hardware and software but they're running a slick operation. |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by EvannTel
(Post 8509415)
Ok, but I was meaning more generically as a company as a whole. Only a few years ago Apple's were in the realm of geeks and techies (esp for graphics) - a bit like Linux now. Today however (and probably in part due to the iPod success) Apple is much more high street and well known. I think on the back of their niche products Mac's are generally getting more acceptance and market share. I'm no expert just my opinion.
I think for that reason iPad will succeed - no doubt there will be technically better products in both hardware and software but they're running a slick operation. |
Re: iPad
Well, I spent most of the morning playing with an iPad which one of our contracted developers kindly leant to me while he was in meetings. It's every bit as good as I thought it would be. That's the thing that the Android advocates don't get - it's not just the fact that it's an amazingly versatile device with a gorgeous screen and a superb operating system, it's the fact that it all works so well together - the sum of its parts - app store and all.
I've had a play with Android based devices and they're very pale imitations of iPhone OS and iPhone hardware (most of the Android apps I played with sucked royally). Similarly I've had a play with Windows 7 tablets and they're pale imitations too. Some people will knock it simply because it's from Apple, it's their loss. While the Google apologists whinge on the owners of Apple products are happily using their devices out in the real world. |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Hutch
(Post 8509466)
Well, I spent most of the morning playing with an iPad which one of our contracted developers kindly leant to me while he was in meetings. It's every bit as good as I thought it would be. That's the thing that the Android advocates don't get - it's not just the fact that it's an amazingly versatile device with a gorgeous screen and a superb operating system, it's the fact that it all works so well together - the sum of its parts - app store and all.
I've had a play with Android based devices and they're very pale imitations of iPhone OS and iPhone hardware (most of the Android apps I played with sucked royally). Similarly I've had a play with Windows 7 tablets and they're pale imitations too. Some people will knock it simply because it's from Apple, it's their loss. While the Google apologists whinge on the owners of Apple products are happily using their devices out in the real world. |
Re: iPad
So what does it do that a tablet doesn't or is it interface design? At the moment Google has no tablet/tampon product.
Originally Posted by Hutch
(Post 8509466)
Well, I spent most of the morning playing with an iPad which one of our contracted developers kindly leant to me while he was in meetings. It's every bit as good as I thought it would be. That's the thing that the Android advocates don't get - it's not just the fact that it's an amazingly versatile device with a gorgeous screen and a superb operating system, it's the fact that it all works so well together - the sum of its parts - app store and all.
I've had a play with Android based devices and they're very pale imitations of iPhone OS and iPhone hardware (most of the Android apps I played with sucked royally). Similarly I've had a play with Windows 7 tablets and they're pale imitations too. Some people will knock it simply because it's from Apple, it's their loss. While the Google apologists whinge on the owners of Apple products are happily using their devices out in the real world. |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8506834)
Now the HTC Desire is out the iPhone is pretty much a dead duck.
In what way does that out perform the Samsung Omnia HD? The Omnia HD is a way better phone/camera/video playback device, and it hasn't managed to knock the iPhone of its perch. JTL |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8509497)
Have you used Android 2.1? Apparently it's much better than the earlier versions.
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 8509507)
So what does it do that a tablet doesn't or is it interface design?
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 8509509)
In what way does that out perform the Samsung Omnia HD?
The Omnia HD is a way better phone/camera/video playback device, and it hasn't managed to knock the iPhone of its perch. JTL |
Re: iPad
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 8509509)
In what way does that out perform the Samsung Omnia HD?
The Omnia HD is a way better phone/camera/video playback device, and it hasn't managed to knock the iPhone of its perch. JTL HTC Desire review: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pho...iew?artc_pg=13 Quote "as a piece of hardware it's without par in the mobile world." |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:06 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.