View Poll Results: Which statement do you agree with
Global warming is caused by humans



27
19.01%
Global warming is a natural process, contribution of human activity is substantial



44
30.99%
Global warming is a natural process, contribution of human activity is negligible



65
45.77%
Global warming seems unlikely



6
4.23%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll
Global warming
#767
Then I got bored (pun intended.)
#768
Cows don't fart - it's a mass conspiracy to stop us getting exercise in the countryside
#773
You can look for greenhouse gases all over the place, and you'll find that not a single source is monitored accurately anyway.
The extra carbon however comes from fossil fuels. Cows don't eat coal, termites don't run on oil. All that carbon was in the atmosphere at one time, now we're putting it back. The earth survived then, it'll survive now.
But of course, the carbon isn't the issue. The issue is a computer model.
#774
So to solve Climate Change we need to bring in a law banning all consumption of beans, beer & curries.
#777
apparently camel farts are very high in CO2.
God knows who stands behind a camel for months measuring this stuff.
now THEY deserve the Nobel Prize (and clean clothes)
God knows who stands behind a camel for months measuring this stuff.
now THEY deserve the Nobel Prize (and clean clothes)
#778
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

And the carbon dioxide production of 6 billion people as opposed to 2 billion at the start of the last century... We breathe in oxygen, we breathe out carbon dioxide.
You can look for greenhouse gases all over the place, and you'll find that not a single source is monitored accurately anyway.
The extra carbon however comes from fossil fuels. Cows don't eat coal, termites don't run on oil. All that carbon was in the atmosphere at one time, now we're putting it back. The earth survived then, it'll survive now.
But of course, the carbon isn't the issue. The issue is a computer model.
You can look for greenhouse gases all over the place, and you'll find that not a single source is monitored accurately anyway.
The extra carbon however comes from fossil fuels. Cows don't eat coal, termites don't run on oil. All that carbon was in the atmosphere at one time, now we're putting it back. The earth survived then, it'll survive now.
But of course, the carbon isn't the issue. The issue is a computer model.
#779
But when we establish that CO2 isn't the problem then any discussion of CO2 is pointless.





mm
tell that to the hundreds of welsh men blown against a farm shed while tring to make love to daisy.