![]() |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8302887)
The problem is the crucial “scary†bits – the headline grabbing, 30 second prime time news grab stuff – is pure emotive rubbish.
This stuff was included to grab the attention of politicians and frighten the public. It worked for a while. Interestingly enough, I read Ann Henderson-Summers article Climate Whistpers: Media Communication about Climate Change yesterday. One of points of the article was how she presented findings on models that made two important predictions: "
(MPI = Maximum Potential Intensity) The Age ran an article titled "Super cyclones on the horizon, say scientists" nice hey? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8302891)
But isn't that the point - that temporary fluctuations over time means that the ocean goes through cooler periods and warmer periods. And that these periods need to be taken into account when forecasting changes in ocean temperature. Indeed there seems to be an argument that the cooling will temporarily stem the increase in ocean temperature due to AGW.
Not only does the ocean go through cooler and warmer periods, so does the entire planet. The CRU may have taken the medieval warming period out of its graphs, but it still existed. So too did the Victorian ice age. I agree that the sea is a huge problem to measure, given that it is subject to currents and convection. Notwithstanding that, about 80% of AGW heat should end up in it. Where is it going if the seas are cooling? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8302910)
Ah - but are the headlines from the IPCC or from journalists? There are plenty of cases where journalists have hyped up scientific reports to give them that "headline grabbing, 30 second prime time news grab stuff"
Interestingly enough, I read Ann Henderson-Summers article Climate Whistpers: Media Communication about Climate Change yesterday. One of points of the article was how she presented findings on models that made two important predictions: "
(MPI = Maximum Potential Intensity) The Age ran an article titled "Super cyclones on the horizon, say scientists" nice hey? But I also believe that the IPCC deliberately included data from environmental advocacy groups (WWF etc) to deliberately “spice up†the argument for urgent action. These documents were not peer reviewed. The head of IPCC has admitted this. Such practices are reprehensible. They bring science into disrepute. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8302914)
Temporary fluctuations that occur, and have occurred for thousands of years without human interference.
Not only does the ocean go through cooler and warmer periods, so does the entire planet. The CRU may have taken the medieval warming period out of its graphs, but it still existed. So too did the Victorian ice age. I agree that the sea is a huge problem to measure, given that it is subject to currents and convection. Notwithstanding that, about 80% of AGW heat should end up in it. Where is it going if the seas are cooling? So there appears to be two events - The first is a short term fluctuating cycle where the ocean cools, following by warming. The second is a long-term trend of warming due to AGW. In the long-run, when you put the two events together, there should be an overall trend of warming. |
Re: Global warming
>>The Argo project has over 3000 submersible robots measuring the temp. of the upper 2km of the world's oceans. These have consistently reported a cooling of the oceans over the last 5 years.<<
....which is what I would expect if thousands of cubic Km of ice had melted. And presumably the heat had been previously absorbed from the lower atmosphere, cooling this relative to what it would otherwise have been? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8302934)
I agree Iolande,
But I also believe that the IPCC deliberately included data from environmental advocacy groups (WWF etc) to deliberately “spice up†the argument for urgent action. These documents were not peer reviewed. The head of IPCC has admitted this. Such practices are reprehensible. They bring science into disrepute. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8302965)
Which WWF data was it? The WWF does support (not financially) research by academics and has a list of areas that they would like academics to investigate. It also employs scientists who work in conjunction with academics.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8302983)
And the research conducted by these scientists is as untainted as those employed by the coal industry?
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 8302954)
>>The Argo project has over 3000 submersible robots measuring the temp. of the upper 2km of the world's oceans. These have consistently reported a cooling of the oceans over the last 5 years.<<
....which is what I would expect if thousands of cubic Km of ice had melted. And presumably the heat had been previously absorbed from the lower atmosphere, cooling this relative to what it would otherwise have been? The Argo data is online, I might pull it down and take a look. |
Re: Global warming
WWF papers used in the IPC WG4 report:
the WWF and cited by this Nobel-winning IPCC AR4 report: Allianz and World Wildlife Fund, 2006: Climate change and the financial sector: an agenda for action, 59 pp. [Accessed 03.05.07: http://www.wwf.org.uk/ filelibrary/pdf/allianz_rep_0605.pdf] Austin, G., A. Williams, G. Morris, R. Spalding-Feche, and R. Worthington, 2003: Employment potential of renewable energy in South Africa. Earthlife Africa, Johannesburg and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Denmark, November, 104 pp. Baker, T., 2005: Vulnerability Assessment of the North-East Atlantic Shelf Marine Ecoregion to Climate Change, Workshop Project Report, WWF, Godalming, Surrey, 79 pp. Coleman, T., O. Hoegh-Guldberg, D. Karoly, I. Lowe, T. McMichael, C.D. Mitchell, G.I. Pearman, P. Scaife and J. Reynolds, 2004: Climate Change: Solutions for Australia. Australian Climate Group, 35 pp. http://www.wwf.org.au/ publications/acg_solutions.pdf Dlugolecki, A. and S. Lafeld, 2005: Climate change – agenda for action: the financial sector’s perspective. Allianz Group and WWF, Munich [may be the same document as "Allianz" above, except that one is dated 2006 and the other 2005] Fritsche, U.R., K. Hünecke, A. Hermann, F. Schulze, and K. Wiegmann, 2006: Sustainability standards for bioenergy. Öko-Institut e.V., Darmstadt, WWF Germany, Frankfurt am Main, November Giannakopoulos, C., M. Bindi, M. Moriondo, P. LeSager and T. Tin, 2005: Climate Change Impacts in the Mediterranean Resulting from a 2oC Global Temperature Rise. WWF report, Gland Switzerland. Accessed 01.10.2006 at http://assets.panda.org/downloads/me...nal8july05.pdf. Hansen, L.J., J.L. Biringer and J.R. Hoffmann, 2003: Buying Time: A User’s Manual for Building Resistance and Resilience to Climate Change in Natural Systems. WWF Climate Change Program, Berlin, 246 pp. http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_...limate_savers/ index.cfm Lechtenbohmer, S., V. Grimm, D. Mitze, S. Thomas, M. Wissner, 2005: Target 2020: Policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. WWF European Policy Office, Wuppertal Malcolm, J.R., C. Liu, L. Miller, T. Allnut and L. Hansen, Eds., 2002a: Habitats at Risk: Global Warming and Species Loss in Globally Significant Terrestrial Ecosystems. WWF World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, 40 pp. Rowell, A. and P.F. Moore, 2000: Global Review of Forest Fires. WWF/IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 66 pp. http://www.iucn.org/themes/fcp/publications /files/global_review_forest_fires.pdf WWF, 2004: Deforestation threatens the cradle of reef diversity. World Wide Fund for Nature, 2 December 2004. http://www.wwf.org/ WWF, 2004: Living Planet Report 2004. WWF- World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund), Gland, Switzerland, 44 pp. WWF (World Wildlife Fund), 2005: An overview of glaciers, glacier retreat, and subsequent impacts in Nepal, India and China. World Wildlife Fund, Nepal Programme, 79 pp. Zarsky, L. and K. Gallagher, 2003: Searching for the Holy Grail? Making FDI Work for Sustainable Development. Analytical Paper, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Switzerland |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8302989)
I didn't realise environmental groups made money out of protecting the environment?
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history/ |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8303005)
Interestingly the WWF partially funds the CRU...
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history/ |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8302989)
I didn't realise environmental groups made money out of protecting the environment?
Operating revenues grew to $196.5 million, a 22 percent increase over the FY07 total of $160.8 million. We received $85.7 million from our members and donors, $26.1 million in government awards, $19.3 million from foundations, $14.6 million from other WWF Network organizations, $10.1 million from corporations, and $40.7 million in other revenues, |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8303007)
and?
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 8303013)
...it's fair enough to list funding sources: the oil, coal, gas and energy industries fund dozens of anti AGW institutions and scientists.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:17 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.