![]() |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 11475760)
I do believe in pollution - the results are there for everyone to see
I do not believe that carbon is causing global warming and therefore do not believe it is pollution It's a con |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475794)
I might as well sell alcohol to kids then.
Go for it |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475794)
I might as well sell alcohol to kids then.
|
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475795)
If companies are pushed to more greener practices, our environment will benefit. The Carbon tax was designed to do this and was making progress. The income from that wasn't the point. It was the change. Do you believe that to be a waste of time?
Australia's contribution to global pollution (real pollution not the CO2 mumbo jumbo) is negligible We should not hurt our economy or ask consumers/taxpayers to pay more for policies that are basically window-dressing and pointless - it's socialist bollocks designed to let the urban middle-class feel like they are 'doing something' If we are going to make the taxpayer pay for this then do something meaningful like building nukes and solar collectors I want a righter, brighter future |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11475800)
Kids generally don't have a hunger for alcohol but if they did then you would be comparing China to a child.
|
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11475771)
China is the largest consumer of coal in the world. Its also the largest producer of coal. They have massive reserves in the North which isn't enough to satisfy their hunger. They also lack the infrastructure to transport it to the south. Step up Australia. Easy shipping from Oz to Southern China. Despite the lip service, they will just continue to be consumption junkies. If Australia doesn't supply them someone else will fill the void.
Take one or more of those away and the others will fill the void |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475803)
Eh no, I'm comparing them to highlight they are both bad practices. Kids want alcohol, I know I did.
Alcohol is demonised too much |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475803)
Eh no, I'm comparing them to highlight they are both bad practices. Kids want alcohol, I know I did.
They will get it from somewhere. |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11475817)
China wants coal. If we play the disciplinarian there is only one loser. Us.
They will get it from somewhere. |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475848)
Nope, we lose if we keep stressing our dependence on the coal industry. Our future is better served if we move away from it as soon as we can.
|
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11475861)
The consumer will dictate that. If China no longer wants coal then we, the producer, will move on. The Chinese recently lip served up this intention. Will they do it?
|
Re: G20
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 11475866)
I forgot about our endless pits of coal.
And when we've done that, do it again. And again. And again Love it |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11475861)
The consumer will dictate that. If China no longer wants coal then we, the producer, will move on. The Chinese recently lip served up this intention. Will they do it?
But in reality, Chinese demand for our coal is declining. There's a large over supply, and steam coal prices have dropped by nearly half in the last 3 years. And now we have people like Glencore trying to manipulate the price by shutting down production for three weeks over Christmas. If the Chinese are serious about investing in alternative generation technology - and we already know they have a huge nuclear programme underway, as well as a R&D into fusion, thorium and other techniques. Plus a huge ongoing investment in other renewables too. I think that nailing our standard to the coal industry shows little insight to what is going on elsewhere in the world. Abbott may not believe in MMGW, but I think that he has buckleys chance of convincing the rest of the world that coal is the future. And in light of that we need to be investing in a non-coal future, rather than trying to ignore it. S |
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11475884)
But in reality, Chinese demand for our coal is declining. There's a large over supply, and steam coal prices have dropped by nearly half in the last 3 years.
And now we have people like Glencore trying to manipulate the price by shutting down production for three weeks over Christmas. If the Chinese are serious about investing in alternative generation technology - and we already know they have a huge nuclear programme underway, as well as a R&D into fusion, thorium and other techniques. Plus a huge ongoing investment in other renewables too. I think that nailing our standard to the coal industry shows little insight to what is going on elsewhere in the world. Abbott may not believe in MMGW, but I think that he has buckleys chance of convincing the rest of the world that coal is the future. And in light of that we need to be investing in a non-coal future, rather than trying to ignore it. S What he really said and it make perfect sense to me, is a thoughtful approach to energy, how its produced, consumed, where its needed, and the financial gains it provides. The Prime Minister this morning said the Coalition “certainly haven’t made a commitment†to the fund and endorsed “sensible policies that don’t impose massive additional burdens on peopleâ€. “The point I made in the G20, and perhaps it wasn’t the most popular point I made, is coal is very important, it’s an important part of the Australian economy, it’s an important part of the world’s energy supply and it will be for decades to come,†Mr Abbott told Sydney radio 2GB. “Sure it’s important to protect the environment, but we’ve also got to raise living standards. And there is 1.3 billion people around the world — one fifth almost of the world’s population — who have no access to electricity at all and the only way they are going to get access to electricity is if we continue to use affordable and efficient coal. “As a result of the parliament agreeing to our direct action plan, which is about incentives, not penalties, we will be putting over the next four years extra money into things like more trees, better soils and smarter technologies.†|
Re: G20
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 11475884)
But in reality, Chinese demand for our coal is declining. There's a large over supply, and steam coal prices have dropped by nearly half in the last 3 years.
And now we have people like Glencore trying to manipulate the price by shutting down production for three weeks over Christmas. If the Chinese are serious about investing in alternative generation technology - and we already know they have a huge nuclear programme underway, as well as a R&D into fusion, thorium and other techniques. Plus a huge ongoing investment in other renewables too. I think that nailing our standard to the coal industry shows little insight to what is going on elsewhere in the world. Abbott may not believe in MMGW, but I think that he has buckleys chance of convincing the rest of the world that coal is the future. And in light of that we need to be investing in a non-coal future, rather than trying to ignore it. S |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:42 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.