![]() |
"Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Just thought I'd let you all know that AGW was a big hoax. :nod:
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph If you don't like or don't think the Telegraph is a reliable source, then please feel free to find the same story from other sources. :) |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Oh goody another global warming thread! :rofl:
I used to be a bit sceptical, I think scepticism is healthy but my current thinking is if 99% of the worlds scientists say it's happening then surely they can't all be wrong and that this is the biggest conspiracy the world has ever seen? |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 11563127)
Oh goody another global warming thread! :rofl:
I used to be a bit sceptical, I think scepticism is healthy but my current thinking is if 99% of the worlds scientists say it's happening then surely they can't all be wrong and that this is the biggest conspiracy the world has ever seen? MMGW is a hard-left plot to break the economies and social structures of the west so that they can impoverish and therefore, control it |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 11563127)
...but my current thinking is if 99% of the worlds scientists say it's happening...
Happy to invest in alternative energy however. |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
|
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
I think the Rockefellers are as well.
|
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by Alfresco
(Post 11563103)
Just thought I'd let you all know that AGW was a big hoax. :nod:
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph The 'is it/isn't it' questions were over at least two decades ago. Anyone still trying to debate them now is either a moron (eg politician), or a liar for money (eg politician). Christopher Brooker has the smell of both. |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
1 Attachment(s)
here's one of the official thermometers, how accurate can it be ?
|
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by spuddyo
(Post 11563830)
here's one of the official thermometers, how accurate can it be ?
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/u...e-etal2010.pdf It's almost as if climate scientists were, I don't know, professionals? |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
The global warming debate (is it, isn't it? is it us, isn't it us?) always misses the most important point - fossil fuels are a finite resource. We need to develop alternative energy sources before they run out or we'll living out Mad Max for real. Since nuclear fission has a tendency to gone spectacularly wrong on a regular basis and fusion is still a concept that means renewables.
|
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 11563127)
Oh goody another global warming thread! :rofl:
I used to be a bit sceptical, I think scepticism is healthy but my current thinking is if 99% of the worlds scientists say it's happening then surely they can't all be wrong and that this is the biggest conspiracy the world has ever seen? If the temp figures have been fudged, this should be able to be verified by others around the world and not just the guy who wrote the article in the link. Time will tell. At school (1970s) I was taught that another ice age was coming and that "most scientists" concur. If they all concurred then about the pending ice age, but now all concur about global warming, then that doesn't say a lot for scientists in general. I will maintain my scepticism. :nod: |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by Alfresco
(Post 11563917)
At school (1970s) I was taught that another ice age was coming and that "most scientists" concur. If they all concurred then about the pending ice age, but now all concur about global warming, then that doesn't say a lot for scientists in general.
There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
But, read this: There has been an intense debate among leading scientists, government agencies and publications over whether the bigger threat is global warming or a new ice age. As we’ve previously noted, top researchers have feared an ice age – off and on – for more than 100 years. (This post does not weigh in one way or the other. It merely presents a historical record.) Global Warming or The “New Ice Age� Fear of the “Big Freeze†| Global Research No doubt there are millions of other articles showing the opposite. So just who do we believe? |
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 11563892)
...or we'll living out Mad Max for real.
|
Re: "Fiddling temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
Originally Posted by Alfresco
(Post 11563917)
If the temp figures have been fudged, this should be able to be verified by others around the world and not just the guy who wrote the article in the link. Time will tell.
Please, the debate on if AGW is happening ended decades ago - time has told and the evidence is overwhelming. The only debate today is if scum like Brooker have meant we are already past the practical point of no return, or if there is still hope. I think most scientists are now, quietly, tending towards the understanding that the pace of change now necessary to avoid runaway is too great for people to actually do it. Failure to act two decades back means we'd now be looking at a pace of change that couldn't be delivered short of a mass disaster - and that the tipping point has practically passed, if not physically. Retreat and adaptation are now the interest areas - along with the climate of the earth in the past when temps were 6C higher than today. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:15 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.