E10 vs. regular unleaded
#1
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 465
From: NSW, Australia











Every little helps, as the saying goes, so it makes sense to buy cheaper E10 unleaded over regular unleaded, right? Except, it's false economy. I think I have found that, for our dream machine (hand-me-down 2009 Toyota Camry auto) my fuel economy is much worse with E10 compared to regular unleaded.
A tank of E10 gets me about 500km on average (mostly town driving). Regular unleaded gets me to 550km, sometimes close to 600km if I drive really sympathetically, but always well over 600km on a long journey.
Bye bye E10.
Anyone with similar/contrary experience?
A tank of E10 gets me about 500km on average (mostly town driving). Regular unleaded gets me to 550km, sometimes close to 600km if I drive really sympathetically, but always well over 600km on a long journey.
Bye bye E10.
Anyone with similar/contrary experience?
#2
Forum Regular




Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
From: Melbourne, Australia











that's pretty much my experience as well, although the difference on our venerable old Mazda 121 is not as marked. I mainly fill with 91 RON unleaded and approx 1 in 4 fills with E10.
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
#3
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040











I have run some tests. Up the coast from Sydney is a little privately run petrol station. He claims his fuel is not watered down and will go longer that the big boy across the road. He charges the same price.
He is right. I always get further on his fuel.
He also says the big boy across the road (one of the big oil companies) continually threatens him as he blatantly advertises with a big banner his fuel will go longer.
He is right. I always get further on his fuel.
He also says the big boy across the road (one of the big oil companies) continually threatens him as he blatantly advertises with a big banner his fuel will go longer.
#4
Go diesel (a proper fuel - and I don't buy into this leftie, harmful emissions mumbo jumbo that is currently sweeping Europe) - 900kms on 55 litres
#5
that's pretty much my experience as well, although the difference on our venerable old Mazda 121 is not as marked. I mainly fill with 91 RON unleaded and approx 1 in 4 fills with E10.
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfEcZWwdjoo
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfEcZWwdjoo
#6
Forum Regular




Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
From: Melbourne, Australia











I've owned diesels for 30 years and just find them better to drive.
#9
Yes, that was pretty much our experience with our 2003 Accord. Originally it got around 33-34mpg +/- 1mpg depending on the season, and after the national switch to E10 (we has no choice in the matter), mpg dropped to 31-32mpg.
#10
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 465
From: NSW, Australia











that's pretty much my experience as well, although the difference on our venerable old Mazda 121 is not as marked. I mainly fill with 91 RON unleaded and approx 1 in 4 fills with E10.
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfEcZWwdjoo
This article covers the differences fairly well. Be warned that the profanity-laden content is quite addictive (imho)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfEcZWwdjoo
#11
Spud





Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 565
From: Avoca Beach











There are lots of threads like this regarding E10. I wouldn't put it in my own car.
https://www.northernstar.com.au/news...-show/1271480/
https://www.northernstar.com.au/news...-show/1271480/




