![]() |
boycot "the daily mail"
Apparently the headline on The Mail on Sunday was 'Err, Bruce...the fire's the other way'
I cant believe some tosser Mail journo thought this was an amusing headline to print while people are being made homeless and dying. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by pingpong
(Post 7265558)
Apparently the headline on The Mail on Sunday was 'Err, Bruce...the fire's the other way'
I cant believe some tosser Mail journo thought this was an amusing headline to print while people are being made homeless and dying. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
I'm too embarrassed to be seen buying it anyway.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Yes, but did the subeditor manage to illustrate how Australian bushfires will lead to more swan-eating gypsy lesbian EU immigrants and the decline of house prices??? That's what's usually important to the Daily Mail...
It's a horrid rag read by two categories of people: Mrs Bouquet types, and people on holiday who can't find anything else in English to read. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Disgusting. Think they should print a full apology. The situation is so so sad.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
As a matter of principle I boycott the Daily Mail because of their objectionable right-wing reactionist editorial policy.
Yes, but did the subeditor manage to illustrate how Australian bushfires will lead to more swan-eating gypsy lesbian EU immigrants and the decline of house prices??? That's what's usually important to the Daily Mail... |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
I have said paper in front of me (being a Daily Mail reader and all):lol:
It's true. Half page picture with a tiny quote box (so I can quote the whole story): "Er, Bruce ... the fire's the other way! A fire engine races along a dirt track in southern Australia yesterday - desperately fleeitng a vast advancing wall of smoke and flames. This is just one of the bush fires raging across 50 miles of Victoria and New South Wales, sparked by record temperatures of 117F (47C). So far at least 25 people have died in the fires, all in rural towns north of Melbourne." The media over here have only just this morning started reporting about how desperately tragic the events are. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Campergirl
(Post 7266103)
The media over here have only just this morning started reporting about how desperately tragic the events are.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by cookiestar
(Post 7266111)
It's been fairly widely reported on in the Scottish written press over Saturday and Sunday too.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Campergirl
(Post 7266103)
I have said paper in front of me (being a Daily Mail reader and all):lol:
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Unfortunately I am not at all surprised.
Imagine how angry they would be if something like that happened in Britain and the Australian press turned it into a joke. The media is one thing I do not miss about Britain.:frown::frown::frown::frown: |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by SNH
(Post 7266160)
Unfortunately I am not at all surprised.
Imagine how angry they would be if something like that happened in Britain and the Australian press turned it into a joke. The media is one thing I do not miss about Britain.:frown::frown::frown::frown: |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by SNH
(Post 7266160)
The media is one thing I do not miss about Britain.:frown::frown::frown::frown:
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
I have been onto the Daily Mail website this morning and there are a large number of readers registering their disgust at the report from the Mail on Sunday. With a bit of luck (which I very much doubt we'll have) they will apologise for the flippant report.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Campergirl
(Post 7266221)
I have been onto the Daily Mail website this morning and there are a large number of readers registering their disgust at the report from the Mail on Sunday. With a bit of luck (which I very much doubt we'll have) they will apologise for the flippant report.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by moneypen20
(Post 7266227)
A one inch by half inch 'apology' at the bottom of page 25 no doubt :mad:
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
The Daily Mail??? Nuff said! gave up years and years ago.. bloody wolf in sheeps clothing! spends the whole time masquerading as a serious paper, when in fact the truth and fact are so far in retreat, it is embarrassing... why not just put its name in "Red Shading" and be done with it? huh?
Em x |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
The mail is just the sun without the tits (oh, sorry should I say boobs!)
Did anyone read their coverage of the Madeleine Mccann story. Vivienne |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by viviennef
(Post 7266311)
The mail is just the sun without the tits (oh, sorry should I say boobs!)
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by cookiestar
(Post 7266348)
I would go as far as to say I'd rather get my news from The Sun than the Daily Mail. At least, though The Sun expresses equally (from my point of view) objectionable opinions, it makes no effort to portray itself as a serious newspaper.
Em x |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
My OH has just rung the editor and asked if they will be printing an apology.
The Editors office were unaware of the offending caption and they will be responding by email tomorrow. He also rang the British High Commission in Canberra this morning and registered his complaint. I shall update once/if an email is received. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
in the 1930s the Daily Mail were admirers of the Nazis and enthusiastic supporters of the British Union of Fascists
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
The debate aspect is still there but there was a comment on the news story comments section by a Stephanie. It had many positive 'votes'but seems to have surprisingly disappeared now. My comment on the picture was obviously filtered out (it was polite) and not posted!!
Originally Posted by Campergirl
(Post 7266221)
I have been onto the Daily Mail website this morning and there are a large number of readers registering their disgust at the report from the Mail on Sunday. With a bit of luck (which I very much doubt we'll have) they will apologise for the flippant report.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by elfman
(Post 7266432)
in the 1930s the Daily Mail were admirers of the Nazis and enthusiastic supporters of the British Union of Fascists
Obviously he was a lunatic but many of hitlers ideas are extremely interesting and well thought out - unlike the daily mail..... |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Yes, but did the subeditor manage to illustrate how Australian bushfires will lead to more swan-eating gypsy lesbian EU immigrants and the decline of house prices??? That's what's usually important to the Daily Mail... |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by pingpong
(Post 7265558)
Apparently the headline on The Mail on Sunday was 'Err, Bruce...the fire's the other way'
I cant believe some tosser Mail journo thought this was an amusing headline to print while people are being made homeless and dying. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
The daily 'hate' mail really is a nasty paper. The stories always revolve around 3 themes:
The scandal of teenager mothers (we didn't have to worry about teens becoming pregnant in the old days because the family would mysteriously disappear then reappear a year later with an 'extra' member) The invasion of the immigrants (they weren't around in the old days) How crime is rocketing under Labour (all this new fangled way of running government it would never have happened back in the good old days of slums and urchins playing in the gutter) |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Deutschmaster
(Post 7269173)
The daily 'hate' mail really is a nasty paper. The stories always revolve around 3 themes:
The scandal of teenager mothers (we didn't have to worry about teens becoming pregnant in the old days because the family would mysteriously disappear then reappear a year later with an 'extra' member) The invasion of the immigrants (they weren't around in the old days) How crime is rocketing under Labour (all this new fangled way of running government it would never have happened back in the good old days of slums and urchins playing in the gutter) Their articles usually have a tiny disclaimer tucked away somewhere about how the previous few 1000 words are just a figment of some hack's fevered imagination. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by jmh
(Post 7265595)
I'm too embarrassed to be seen buying it anyway.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
There was that time a couple of years back when you had to buy four daily mails to get a cheap train ticket. As a skint student I did collect them - although made sure that the woman in the shop knew that i was just after the coupons, I wasn't buying it for a good read :o
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by pingpong
(Post 7265558)
Apparently the headline on The Mail on Sunday was 'Err, Bruce...the fire's the other way'
I cant believe some tosser Mail journo thought this was an amusing headline to print while people are being made homeless and dying. There was also an aussie article where some aussie yob asked the media on arrival at scene of many deaths if they liked BBQ deer :blink: Its seems an appaling subject to make jokes about. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 7269460)
There was also an aussie article where some aussie yob asked the media on arrival at scene of many deaths if they liked BBQ deer :blink:
Its seems an appaling subject to make jokes about. It's possible that it was made by someone on scene using the black humour of someone who has been through trauma - might have been a bit of a warning across the bows to the media not to leech.. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 7269580)
At least it was not the media!
It's possible that it was made by someone on scene using the black humour of someone who has been through trauma - might have been a bit of a warning across the bows to the media not to leech.. Yeah but the media were saying what a hero, good bloke, great laugh this guy was:blink: He just struck me as a dickhead. Each to their own I guess. How did you go, did you go out with the CFA, I think you had fire near your village, not too close I hope. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 7269580)
At least it was not the media!
It's possible that it was made by someone on scene using the black humour of someone who has been through trauma - might have been a bit of a warning across the bows to the media not to leech.. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Hello did you get any response at all by email/any apology in the paper?
Originally Posted by OzSheila
(Post 7266406)
My OH has just rung the editor and asked if they will be printing an apology.
The Editors office were unaware of the offending caption and they will be responding by email tomorrow. He also rang the British High Commission in Canberra this morning and registered his complaint. I shall update once/if an email is received. |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Dailygrind
(Post 7273790)
Hello did you get any response at all by email/any apology in the paper?
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by Dailygrind
(Post 7273790)
Hello did you get any response at all by email/any apology in the paper?
Dear Mr XXXX, Thank you very much for your phone call to the Editor's office. Whilst it is the case that news of most of the damage caused by the Australian fires only reached Britain after we went to press on Saturday evening, it was nevertheless an unfortunate choice of headline. I am very grateful to you for pointing this out and will speak to the sub-editors concerned to make sure this does not happen aain. In the meantime I hope you will accept our sincere apologies for the offence we have clearly caused you. Yours sincerely, Peter Wright Editor The Mail on Sunday _____________________________________ Northcliffe House 2 Derry Street London, W8 5TS t. +44 (0) 20 7938 6118 f. +44 (0) 20 7937 6721 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Still not satisfactory given that by the time they went to press 14 deaths had been confirmed! No joking matter! |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Did you get a voucher to get a free copy tomorrow :rolleyes: Let's face it, no apology would be enough, morons.
|
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
:mad:Thanks for trying.
Under the offensive caption the last paragraph says 'so far at least 25 people have died in the fires, all in rural towns north of Melbourne', so I dont think this is an appropriate apology. I did look at Press complaints site but couldnt find a category. Discrimination only applies to an individual.
Originally Posted by OzSheila
(Post 7274088)
Ooh look what's just turned up in the Inbox:
Dear Mr XXXX, Thank you very much for your phone call to the Editor's office. Whilst it is the case that news of most of the damage caused by the Australian fires only reached Britain after we went to press on Saturday evening, it was nevertheless an unfortunate choice of headline. I am very grateful to you for pointing this out and will speak to the sub-editors concerned to make sure this does not happen aain. In the meantime I hope you will accept our sincere apologies for the offence we have clearly caused you. Yours sincerely, Peter Wright Editor The Mail on Sunday _____________________________________ Northcliffe House 2 Derry Street London, W8 5TS t. +44 (0) 20 7938 6118 f. +44 (0) 20 7937 6721 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Still not satisfactory given that by the time they went to press 14 deaths had been confirmed! No joking matter! |
Re: boycot "the daily mail"
Originally Posted by OzSheila
(Post 7274088)
Ooh look what's just turned up in the Inbox:
Dear Mr XXXX, Thank you very much for your phone call to the Editor's office. Whilst it is the case that news of most of the damage caused by the Australian fires only reached Britain after we went to press on Saturday evening, it was nevertheless an unfortunate choice of headline. I am very grateful to you for pointing this out and will speak to the sub-editors concerned to make sure this does not happen aain. In the meantime I hope you will accept our sincere apologies for the offence we have clearly caused you. (oh, and not forgetting the rest of Australia!) Yours sincerely, Peter Wright Editor The Mail on Sunday _____________________________________ Northcliffe House 2 Derry Street London, W8 5TS t. +44 (0) 20 7938 6118 f. +44 (0) 20 7937 6721 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Still not satisfactory given that by the time they went to press 14 deaths had been confirmed! No joking matter! |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:40 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.