|
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 8859202)
Well, no, I'm sure there's probably plenty of Inidans who have an issue with Islam as well.
JTL |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by JackTheLad
(Post 8859265)
Inidan? Thats twice you've spelt it that way. Third strike and you are out. Mods watch him.. if he can't spell Indian correctly, ban him:sneaky:. For gods sake show some respect for the Inidians:p
JTL |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859105)
To become a refugee, a claimant must prove they are in danger of torture, there is a risk to their life or meet other criteria showing they will face persecution in their home country. Yet this did not stop over 70% of successful Tamil refugee claimants surveyed from returning to Sri Lanka for vacations, business or to sponsor family members. "I think it's been fairly common knowledge, that after asylum seekers get status they go back," said James Bissett a former head of Immigration Canada. "Certainly after they get landed immigrant status they go back." This figures effectively mean that about 70% of refugees allowed into Canada were not genuine. I winder how that compares to Australia. |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by mohogony
(Post 8859258)
Everyone hates me :cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile:
|
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by cresta57
(Post 8859262)
Or it could be that we're intelligent enough to know when someone is deliberately trolling for a response:sneaky:
I grew up with people of all races & nationalities 95 % are damn fine people there's a few bad apples on every tree:rolleyes: Are you trying to suppress my contribution by saying that? |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859249)
I'm an Aussie on this Forum.
I speak to quite a few Pommie settlers who have come to Australia to make it their home, and I welcome them. During the course of our conversations the overwhelming majority say that one of the factors that helped them to decide to leave the UK was that the white anglo-saxon is becoming a disadvantaged minority in his own country and another is the inevitable Islamisation of their country. Yet here on this Forum, most people go out of their way to be politically correct. Could it be that some of you are so conditioned to being afraid to speak out that you are still worried, even on an anonymous Forum? Just an observation. Absolutely, and its pathetic to witness. |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859281)
Not trolling at all.
Are you trying to suppress my contribution by saying that? |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
One of the comments made to me is that, if a negative comment is made in the UK, there are a chorus of people ready to sprout accusations of rascism.
Calling me a troll is one step away from calling me a rascist. It never ceases to amaze me that if a comment is made about a particular group of people, anyone who disagrees trots out the rascist tags. Just as an interesting aside, there was a US news item on TV the other day about kids playing computer games. There were African/American kids, and other ethnic groups tagged by the *****/American label. And there were white kids. White kids are still allowed to be referred to by the colour of their skin but not, apparently, other groups whose skin was not white. |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859281)
Not trolling at all.
Are you trying to suppress my contribution by saying that? |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859315)
It never ceases to amaze me that if a comment is made about a particular group of people, anyone who disagrees trots out the rascist tags.
|
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Condor of Bermuda
(Post 8859281)
Not trolling at all.
Are you trying to suppress my contribution by saying that? |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
(Post 8859276)
Certainly makes interesting reading...
To become a refugee, a claimant must prove they are in danger of torture, there is a risk to their life or meet other criteria showing they will face persecution in their home country. Yet this did not stop over 70% of successful Tamil refugee claimants surveyed from returning to Sri Lanka for vacations, business or to sponsor family members. "I think it's been fairly common knowledge, that after asylum seekers get status they go back," said James Bissett a former head of Immigration Canada. "Certainly after they get landed immigrant status they go back." This figures effectively mean that about 70% of refugees allowed into Canada were not genuine. I winder how that compares to Australia. |
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by mohogony
(Post 8859679)
Shows what l said was correct and not racist garbage:thumbsup:
|
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 8859184)
This information will never be revealed. But l suspect he's never been further than West Whoopwhoopalong.
|
Re: Asylum seekers cashed up
Originally Posted by Dorothy
(Post 8859180)
WTF does a news story from Canada have to do with Australian asylum seekers being cashed up?
Tell us mahogony, where are you from? And what visa did you come to Australia on? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:46 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.