Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
#286
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
Dancing on the head of a pin.
#288
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Hill overlooking the SE Melbourne suburbs
Posts: 16,622
#289
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
Once again the point goes whooshing over your head.
You can be as responsible as you like, it might not prevent your pitbull attacking someone, and that when it does the results are likely to be worse than your average mutt. That's why American Pitbulls were banned in the first place.... but heigh ho, I'm sure you have another view.
You can be as responsible as you like, it might not prevent your pitbull attacking someone, and that when it does the results are likely to be worse than your average mutt. That's why American Pitbulls were banned in the first place.... but heigh ho, I'm sure you have another view.
However, keeping the dog that I do own on a leash and keeping my garden secure, means that the only people ever likely to be on the receiving end of my dog turning rabid are within my household and maybe any burglars who wish to chance their arm.
As my dog is well socialized with people and other animals and has a very gentle nature, I do not have any undue worry that we are likely to come under attack any time soon, but regardless, I can guarantee you and your family are safe from my dog due to the aforementioned safeguards.
Now, can I assume all of your lifestyle choices ie choose of vehicle etc etc, do not increase other peoples risk unnecessarily?
#290
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
Like I've already said, if you actually read what people post, I don't own a pitbull or staffy, never have done and don't intend to.
However, keeping the dog that I do own on a leash and keeping my garden secure, means that the only people ever likely to be on the receiving end of my dog turning rabid are within my household and maybe any burglars who wish to chance their arm.
As my dog is well socialized with people and other animals and has a very gentle nature, I do not have any undue worry that we are likely to come under attack any time soon, but regardless, I can guarantee you and your family are safe from my dog due to the aforementioned safeguards.
Now, can I assume all of your lifestyle choices ie choose of vehicle etc etc, do not increase other peoples risk unnecessarily?
However, keeping the dog that I do own on a leash and keeping my garden secure, means that the only people ever likely to be on the receiving end of my dog turning rabid are within my household and maybe any burglars who wish to chance their arm.
As my dog is well socialized with people and other animals and has a very gentle nature, I do not have any undue worry that we are likely to come under attack any time soon, but regardless, I can guarantee you and your family are safe from my dog due to the aforementioned safeguards.
Now, can I assume all of your lifestyle choices ie choose of vehicle etc etc, do not increase other peoples risk unnecessarily?
#291
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
I think that ^^^ should be the last word on the matter
I've been reading this thread with interest because we have a dog from the SPCA as a pup who clearly has some staffie in her and I must admit I was initially anxious about that. We researched staffies before we took her on and decided they seem fine, albeit smart and needing firm training. She's had the puppy classes and we've done a fair job on training her and she is a real darling of a dog, particularly with the children
Having said that I have noticed with her that although she never starts a ruck with another dog and always approaches other dogs in (boisterous) good humour, if they start on her she doesn't run off with her tail wrapped round her arse like my old dog did, she stands her ground. This has only happened once or twice but it has been enough to make me decide that I only exercise her on-leash and off-leash only when there are no other dogs around. My husband has no such issue with her because he only has to call her and no matter what she is doing she returns to him. She has also never been defensive toward another dog in just his presence. From this I conclude that I am not as effective a dog owner as he is, but also that she is not the sort of dog that should be in the hands of the feckless or those with ill-intent. It makes me sad to think of where she could have ended up- her desire to please is enormous, she is utterly fearless and would be very easy to train to do badness. My first dog, a whippet cross, was completely different, so it's not just me.
As a dog owner I think ALL dogs should be on-leash unless they're in dog exercise areas and if they're not so great with other dogs they should be permanently on-leash. I also think, and I know this is controversial, that there shouldn't be second chances for aggressive dogs and there should be heavier punishments for owners of dogs who are aggressive and are not kept under tight control. I don't think we should ban a breed, but only because I think it would be pointless and the measures I've mentioned would be more effective. We have a ridiculous number of dog attacks here in NZ.
I've been reading this thread with interest because we have a dog from the SPCA as a pup who clearly has some staffie in her and I must admit I was initially anxious about that. We researched staffies before we took her on and decided they seem fine, albeit smart and needing firm training. She's had the puppy classes and we've done a fair job on training her and she is a real darling of a dog, particularly with the children
Having said that I have noticed with her that although she never starts a ruck with another dog and always approaches other dogs in (boisterous) good humour, if they start on her she doesn't run off with her tail wrapped round her arse like my old dog did, she stands her ground. This has only happened once or twice but it has been enough to make me decide that I only exercise her on-leash and off-leash only when there are no other dogs around. My husband has no such issue with her because he only has to call her and no matter what she is doing she returns to him. She has also never been defensive toward another dog in just his presence. From this I conclude that I am not as effective a dog owner as he is, but also that she is not the sort of dog that should be in the hands of the feckless or those with ill-intent. It makes me sad to think of where she could have ended up- her desire to please is enormous, she is utterly fearless and would be very easy to train to do badness. My first dog, a whippet cross, was completely different, so it's not just me.
As a dog owner I think ALL dogs should be on-leash unless they're in dog exercise areas and if they're not so great with other dogs they should be permanently on-leash. I also think, and I know this is controversial, that there shouldn't be second chances for aggressive dogs and there should be heavier punishments for owners of dogs who are aggressive and are not kept under tight control. I don't think we should ban a breed, but only because I think it would be pointless and the measures I've mentioned would be more effective. We have a ridiculous number of dog attacks here in NZ.
#292
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
As a dog owner I think ALL dogs should be on-leash unless they're in dog exercise areas and if they're not so great with other dogs they should be permanently on-leash. I also think, and I know this is controversial, that there shouldn't be second chances for aggressive dogs and there should be heavier punishments for owners of dogs who are aggressive and are not kept under tight control. I don't think we should ban a breed, but only because I think it would be pointless and the measures I've mentioned would be more effective. We have a ridiculous number of dog attacks here in NZ.
Personally I think some breeds should be banned. Other people would disagree. How would you feel about these becoming a regular sight down the High Street?
#293
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,442
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
All dogs irrespective of breed should be on the lead, period. The only exception to this would be in an area specifically for dog socialisation.
Don't be lazy, get off your arse and take your Vizsla for a 5k run. There's no reason to take it off the lead. You might get fit too.
#294
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,442
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
My husband has no such issue with her because he only has to call her and no matter what she is doing she returns to him. She has also never been defensive toward another dog in just his presence. From this I conclude that I am not as effective a dog owner as he is,
#295
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
He looks a real softie!
Thought it was a bit cruel putting the collar around his neck and not a harness, he could have choked and he would have pulled it better from the chest!
Well done to Bourbon-Biscuit for recognising her dogs personality and taking action. I think some of the problems with the dogs in discussion is that owners don't always consider that other dog owners or the public may be afraid of their dogs. With todays "lets sue for anything" culture if I had a dog that showed any aggression or scared people then I'd keep it on the lead at all times as I wouldn't want to end up in court if it did anything!
Thought it was a bit cruel putting the collar around his neck and not a harness, he could have choked and he would have pulled it better from the chest!
Well done to Bourbon-Biscuit for recognising her dogs personality and taking action. I think some of the problems with the dogs in discussion is that owners don't always consider that other dog owners or the public may be afraid of their dogs. With todays "lets sue for anything" culture if I had a dog that showed any aggression or scared people then I'd keep it on the lead at all times as I wouldn't want to end up in court if it did anything!
#297
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,442
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
It can run at 30mph and weigh in at 90Kg. Looks less of a softie in this one.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HO9LEPcMC...layer_embedded
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HO9LEPcMC...layer_embedded
#298
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
Nothing at all. It's just an extreme example of a potentially dangerous dog.
I assume you would be happy with those trotting round the neighbourhood on a leash as well?
With a responsible owner of course.
I assume you would be happy with those trotting round the neighbourhood on a leash as well?
With a responsible owner of course.
Last edited by iamthecreaturefromuranus; Sep 1st 2010 at 12:15 am.
#299
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
I know And I do know why and what I should/could do to become =top dog, but I'm only ever 80% effective for many reasons. For example I find all my staffie's talking hysterical, an absolute hoot, whilst my husband thinks it's dominating and only lets her woowoo at him when he invites her to.
I must make a concerted effort; my failing!
#300
Re: Staffordshire Bull Terriers in Australia
Haha, what did he get on his hand that needed washing off?! Eww!!!
Did you think those dogs were looking vicious toward each other?
Did you think those dogs were looking vicious toward each other?