renting your aussie property out and getting a rental?
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Many people get caught on this. Take this "extreme" example...
$300,000 Mortgage
A friend lends you $200,000 for 2 months, you place it in the mortgage account, the balance drops to $100,000. You then redraw the $200,000 and the balance goes back up to $300,000.
But now, the ATO only allow repayments on the $100,000 to be tax deductible !
Another example, one that really happens, is that some people use a Portfolio type loan for investment and personal use.
A $300,000 investment loan but with a personal income going in every month of say $5,000, and $5,000 of personal expenses going out each month, plus rent of $2,000 going in and mortgage interest of $2,000 going out.
The balance stays the same at $300,000, but the tax man will see it reducing by that $5,000 every month. After 5 years, the mortgage has become totally non tax deductible.
Not fair, but those are the rules, and all accountants should advise clients accordingly.
#17
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

yeah sounds a bit mad doesnt it or does it??
wonder has anyone done this, rented your house out moved to another state/area and rented.. if so how do you go about getting references for new rental will the fact you own a property be enough or what. Just wanna go see new pastures an all
but dont wanna burn bridges 
wonder has anyone done this, rented your house out moved to another state/area and rented.. if so how do you go about getting references for new rental will the fact you own a property be enough or what. Just wanna go see new pastures an all
but dont wanna burn bridges 
#18
Account Closed










Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,316

#19
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 629
From: Melbourne











No, definately not.
Many people get caught on this. Take this "extreme" example...
$300,000 Mortgage
A friend lends you $200,000 for 2 months, you place it in the mortgage account, the balance drops to $100,000. You then redraw the $200,000 and the balance goes back up to $300,000.
But now, the ATO only allow repayments on the $100,000 to be tax deductible !
Another example, one that really happens, is that some people use a Portfolio type loan for investment and personal use.
A $300,000 investment loan but with a personal income going in every month of say $5,000, and $5,000 of personal expenses going out each month, plus rent of $2,000 going in and mortgage interest of $2,000 going out.
The balance stays the same at $300,000, but the tax man will see it reducing by that $5,000 every month. After 5 years, the mortgage has become totally non tax deductible.
Not fair, but those are the rules, and all accountants should advise clients accordingly.
Many people get caught on this. Take this "extreme" example...
$300,000 Mortgage
A friend lends you $200,000 for 2 months, you place it in the mortgage account, the balance drops to $100,000. You then redraw the $200,000 and the balance goes back up to $300,000.
But now, the ATO only allow repayments on the $100,000 to be tax deductible !
Another example, one that really happens, is that some people use a Portfolio type loan for investment and personal use.
A $300,000 investment loan but with a personal income going in every month of say $5,000, and $5,000 of personal expenses going out each month, plus rent of $2,000 going in and mortgage interest of $2,000 going out.
The balance stays the same at $300,000, but the tax man will see it reducing by that $5,000 every month. After 5 years, the mortgage has become totally non tax deductible.
Not fair, but those are the rules, and all accountants should advise clients accordingly.
How do people release the equity then from their investment property to purchase another? I thought that was the main way of doing it.
#20
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,412











Are you sure it's equity release from their investment property rather than their PPR? I'm not entirely au fait with the mechanisms employed by negatively geared property investors. But I would think it would make more sense to borrow against the wholly owned investment property using it as collateral rather than do an equity release.
#21
I wonder if anyone can answer my original question re the references, do you still need to provide references when renting a property?
#22
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,412











Proof of home ownership should be enough. They can't ask you to provide references for rentals you haven't had. How long have you been an owner occupier? They may just require extra character references or something. Call an agent and ask.
#23
Just get someone who knows you to provide a phone reference, that should be sufficient.
Also if you are going to use an agent to help you rent out your property, they may be able to give you a reference saying that your home is in good repair etc

</IMG>
#24
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am not sure how long the rules have been like that, but definitely since at least 2003, when I found out about it.




