Avoiding mobile masts
#16
Originally Posted by Deadmeat
All you ever didn't need to know about the underclass:
http://www.chavscum.co.uk/
But hey, it takes all sorts to make a world ... without chavs who would take their place? It'd be anarchy ...
Ta for the definition I shall add "Numpty" to "PMSL" as things I have learnt this week
http://www.chavscum.co.uk/
But hey, it takes all sorts to make a world ... without chavs who would take their place? It'd be anarchy ...
Ta for the definition I shall add "Numpty" to "PMSL" as things I have learnt this week

Try this link to Peter's site.
PMSL is only the start
http://www.ulujain.org/acronym.shtml
#17
Forum Regular


Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 74
From: Norfolk, England


The scare surrounding cellphone masts has really gotten out of hand recently. The jury is still out regarding the long-term effects of exposure to high field strengths, but that is really beside the point unless you intend to build your house on stilts right alongside a cellular antenna.
The first thing people should be aware of is that radio waves obey the "inverse square law." That means that every time you double your distance from the energy source, the intensity of the field diminishes to one quarter of its previous level. In practical terms, that means that the field strength you are exposed to while actually using a cellphone in close proximity to your body is far greater than that from a cell tower even just a few yards away, even though the power of the phone is much lower than that fed to the mast.
Second, even if you do follow an extremely over-cautious 2-mile rule, are you going to move home every time a new celltower is erected within that 2-mile radius?
It only seems to be cellphone antennas which have attracted the media hype. The field strength from a main UHF TV transmitter is many times greater than a typical cellphone antenna, and approaching similar frequencies at the high end of the band, yet we don;t seem to hear anything about that.
In other words, I wouldn't worry about it!
The first thing people should be aware of is that radio waves obey the "inverse square law." That means that every time you double your distance from the energy source, the intensity of the field diminishes to one quarter of its previous level. In practical terms, that means that the field strength you are exposed to while actually using a cellphone in close proximity to your body is far greater than that from a cell tower even just a few yards away, even though the power of the phone is much lower than that fed to the mast.
Second, even if you do follow an extremely over-cautious 2-mile rule, are you going to move home every time a new celltower is erected within that 2-mile radius?
It only seems to be cellphone antennas which have attracted the media hype. The field strength from a main UHF TV transmitter is many times greater than a typical cellphone antenna, and approaching similar frequencies at the high end of the band, yet we don;t seem to hear anything about that.
In other words, I wouldn't worry about it!
#18
¤¤¤ • ¤¤¤ • ¤¤¤ • ¤¤¤







Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,867
From: Frankston South, Victoria











Originally Posted by Ruptured gonad
In the UK before I look at a property I used to check there were no mobile masts within a 2 mile radius on http://www.sitefinder.radio.gov.uk/
Does anyone know if there is a similar site for Australia?
Does anyone know if there is a similar site for Australia?
D D
#19
Thread Starter
Forum Regular

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 44

UK government tries to hide aDept of Health report which says powerlines double chances of children developing cancer & leukemia
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi there,
Ive just read your link.
We have powerlines going through the estate in which we live. Fortunately though our house is far enough away from them. But dont you think they are everywhere???!!!
What can you do??!!
Cheeky
Ive just read your link.
We have powerlines going through the estate in which we live. Fortunately though our house is far enough away from them. But dont you think they are everywhere???!!!
What can you do??!!
Cheeky
Originally Posted by Ruptured gonad
UK government tries to hide aDept of Health report which says powerlines double chances of children developing cancer & leukemia
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Oh I know!!!
Ill move to Oz!!
Cheeky
Ill move to Oz!!
Cheeky
Originally Posted by Cheeky
Hi there,
Ive just read your link.
We have powerlines going through the estate in which we live. Fortunately though our house is far enough away from them. But dont you think they are everywhere???!!!
What can you do??!!
Cheeky
Ive just read your link.
We have powerlines going through the estate in which we live. Fortunately though our house is far enough away from them. But dont you think they are everywhere???!!!
What can you do??!!
Cheeky
#22
Originally Posted by Ruptured gonad
UK government tries to hide aDept of Health report which says powerlines double chances of children developing cancer & leukemia
Presumably there is also a report somewhere saying the jury is still out.
We all have our own opinions but I think that if you stay away from everything that could possibly, at some point, maybe cause you an illness, there would be no where to live, nothing to eat etc.
You only get one life, enjoy it without worrying about something that might happen.
If I have started an argument, sorry, didn't mean to
#23
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226



[QUOTE=moneypen20]Presumably there is also a report somewhere saying the jury is still out.[QUOTE=moneypen20]
I'm sure there is a report somewhere saying "the jury's still out", but while they are, I don't think I personally would like to risk my children's lives untill they decide to make their minds up.......
[QUOTE=moneypen20]We all have our own opinions but I think that if you stay away from everything that could possibly, at some point, maybe cause you an illness, there would be no where to live, nothing to eat etc.
You only get one life, enjoy it without worrying about something that might happen.[QUOTE=moneypen20]
It might not....... but then again, it just might.........
[QUOTE=moneypen20]If I have started an argument, sorry, didn't mean to
[QUOTE=moneypen20]
Don't mean to argue either
I'm sure there is a report somewhere saying "the jury's still out", but while they are, I don't think I personally would like to risk my children's lives untill they decide to make their minds up.......
[QUOTE=moneypen20]We all have our own opinions but I think that if you stay away from everything that could possibly, at some point, maybe cause you an illness, there would be no where to live, nothing to eat etc.
You only get one life, enjoy it without worrying about something that might happen.[QUOTE=moneypen20]
It might not....... but then again, it just might.........
[QUOTE=moneypen20]If I have started an argument, sorry, didn't mean to
[QUOTE=moneypen20]Don't mean to argue either
Last edited by kath n kim; Oct 29th 2004 at 9:54 am.
#24
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226



http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/...1157451,00.html
Just found this link in Take it outside (sorry if it doesn't click on, if it doesn't take a look in Take it Outside for story on cancer link near high voltage power lines...)
Just found this link in Take it outside (sorry if it doesn't click on, if it doesn't take a look in Take it Outside for story on cancer link near high voltage power lines...)
Last edited by kath n kim; Oct 30th 2004 at 9:38 pm.




