Anti 4x4 sentiment
#136
BE Forum Addict
Joined: May 2005
Location: Mornington
Posts: 1,650
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
The 'old' problem with Landies wasn't so much that they went wrong - in the 'good old days' everything went wrong to some degree, it was the time to get parts which was the problem. Not too bad in the very early days of points/plugs etc, but once they started to go 'electronic' it became more of a problem.
This is spot on, I remember looking at one that had been in a bit of a fire, the parts department couldn't locate a part of the loom they required, so they sent someone down from the factory to look at it and he couldn't identify the part either!! So they had to go away and make one up for it
When they started to go upmarket to appeal to a different customer this is where they got in trouble.
A good mate of mine brought a brand new one in 2003 and it was forever in and out of the dealers, the funniest time was when all the windows and sunroof decided to open on their own in the pouring rain and refused to go back up, he had to drive from Norwich to Chelmsford getting soaked
They seem to have cracked it with the new Discovery as this gets rave reviews.
This is spot on, I remember looking at one that had been in a bit of a fire, the parts department couldn't locate a part of the loom they required, so they sent someone down from the factory to look at it and he couldn't identify the part either!! So they had to go away and make one up for it
When they started to go upmarket to appeal to a different customer this is where they got in trouble.
A good mate of mine brought a brand new one in 2003 and it was forever in and out of the dealers, the funniest time was when all the windows and sunroof decided to open on their own in the pouring rain and refused to go back up, he had to drive from Norwich to Chelmsford getting soaked
They seem to have cracked it with the new Discovery as this gets rave reviews.
#137
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 795
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I am not anti 4x4's per se, just metal bull bars. As this study concludeshttp://casr.adelaide.edu.au/reports/CASR020.pdf
"..we can conclude that fitting a vehicle with a metal bull bar increases the risk of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in the event of a collision, even though many of the vehicles that these bull bars are fitted to also perform poorly."
"..we can conclude that fitting a vehicle with a metal bull bar increases the risk of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in the event of a collision, even though many of the vehicles that these bull bars are fitted to also perform poorly."
#138
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I am not anti 4x4's per se, just metal bull bars. As this study concludeshttp://casr.adelaide.edu.au/reports/CASR020.pdf
"..we can conclude that fitting a vehicle with a metal bull bar increases the risk of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in the event of a collision, even though many of the vehicles that these bull bars are fitted to also perform poorly."
"..we can conclude that fitting a vehicle with a metal bull bar increases the risk of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in the event of a collision, even though many of the vehicles that these bull bars are fitted to also perform poorly."
"A bull bar in the bush is worth a pedestrian in the city"
#140
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
If you want a 4x4 then get one, like someone said earlier, nearly every other vehicle on OZ roads is a 4x4. My only gripe is this, i'm a motorcyclist (not weekend dry weather rider, but use it everyday for work), I have nearly been knocked off 4 times (twice on freeway, once on highway and once going to coles with my little boy as pillion) and guess what, all 4 times it was a 4x4 that tried to kill me/us. People in OZ aren't as aware of bikers as they are in the UK. Now either they have the 'im the king of the road' attitude, they dont use their mirrors, they don't check their blind spot or they just don't give a s41t. All i ask of all the 4x4 drivers (and car drivers) in OZ is try to be more aware on the roads and check your blind spot before moving lanes, you may be fortunate enough to only get a booted door panel (like the last one that swiped me). Everyone can choose what they want to ride/drive, it's a free country, just remember, you may feel safer in a 4x4, but you are driving a very dangerous weapon that can kill if not treated with respect.
On another note, everyone should be aware that the Aussie driving lessons must'nt teach them the give way rule, (or they forget about it), 'cos no-one gives way over here, to anyone.
On another note, everyone should be aware that the Aussie driving lessons must'nt teach them the give way rule, (or they forget about it), 'cos no-one gives way over here, to anyone.
#141
Victorian Evangelist
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, by the beach, living the dream.
Posts: 7,704
#143
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Yes and No, the driver is obviously the one controlling the vehicle, but the point i'm making is that it is easier for a car driver to see a biker than it is for a 4x4 driver or a lorry driver simply due to ride heights, especially in blind spots. So all i'm asking is for drivers to check blind spots before manouvering, especially 4x4 drivers, never assume it's clear to manouvere It's only through my years of motorcycling experience that i'm still around after arriving in OZ.
#144
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Hill overlooking the SE Melbourne suburbs
Posts: 16,622
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I find that Australian drivers are less aware.
I'm the same - easier driving conditions and straight lanes give you less room to hone defensive driving skills.
I'm now '"rusty'' and London would be a shock by comparison. I'm not going to pretend I'm the world's best driver because I learnt to drive in the UK.
I live semi-rural and there are still more sedans and wagons than 4x4.
I'm the same - easier driving conditions and straight lanes give you less room to hone defensive driving skills.
I'm now '"rusty'' and London would be a shock by comparison. I'm not going to pretend I'm the world's best driver because I learnt to drive in the UK.
I live semi-rural and there are still more sedans and wagons than 4x4.
#145
Just Joined
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Mt Cotton, Brisbane
Posts: 9
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Hi all,
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
#146
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Hi all,
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
#147
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Hill overlooking the SE Melbourne suburbs
Posts: 16,622
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Hi all,
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
an interesting read this thread and heres my 2 cents worth....
I owned a mitsubishi challenger and now a new prajero bought in 06 (a run out before the new shape but got a $14k discount).
Im based in SE Brissy and been over the ferry to north straddie quite a few times and the challenger being a basic medium 4x4 never let me down at all apart from my mistakes in drving across beach ruts instead of through them.
The Pajero which from what i seen has hardly had a mention IMO is a great
4x4, comfy and with more toys than the prado (GLS vs GLX) traction, stability.etc).
I work for WIN TV as a project eng so i get to travel all over Queensland and soon to NSW to broadcast sites in the middle of nowhere normally on top of mountains where the dirt roads are very poor quality and the pajero has never let me down yet on up or downhill pot holed tracks towing a trailer, granted with the roof racks and nudge bar it is now got the aero-dymanics of a brick so the fuel consumption is on the heavy side (average 550km /80litre tank) but hey i dont pay the fuel so i dont mind
Like i read in a eariler reply go for what u feel comfy in.... from what i seen around the serious 4x4er has a older 4x4 ute jacked up with big tyres.
I had a landcruser for 2 weeks working up in cairns a turbo diesel and it was a great ,capable car but is it worth 70k ,no ******* way considering it had fairly basic interior. the pajero might not be the trendy or the prettyist but its one of the more capable 4x4s winning the dakar rally numerious time it must be doing something right for driving across sand and dirt.
ibbertson
#149
Victorian Evangelist
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, by the beach, living the dream.
Posts: 7,704
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
OK - the Ssangyong Rexton.
Surprisingly, it's a great car. It has a Mercedes engine (Ssangyong is 51% owned by Mercedes.) It feels really well made, much better than Hyundai or even Mitsubishi. It's got all the toys and rides really smoothly.
However we are ruling it out purely on the 7 seats as the 7 seat version means you lose about half your boot in a vertical direction as they are sort of stuck on to the floor of the boot.
I would encourage anyone to try this car out, though, I was very impressed.
Buzzy
Surprisingly, it's a great car. It has a Mercedes engine (Ssangyong is 51% owned by Mercedes.) It feels really well made, much better than Hyundai or even Mitsubishi. It's got all the toys and rides really smoothly.
However we are ruling it out purely on the 7 seats as the 7 seat version means you lose about half your boot in a vertical direction as they are sort of stuck on to the floor of the boot.
I would encourage anyone to try this car out, though, I was very impressed.
Buzzy
#150
Australia's Doorman
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: The Shoalhaven, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 11,056
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
OK - the Ssangyong Rexton.
Surprisingly, it's a great car. It has a Mercedes engine (Ssangyong is 51% owned by Mercedes.) It feels really well made, much better than Hyundai or even Mitsubishi. It's got all the toys and rides really smoothly.
However we are ruling it out purely on the 7 seats as the 7 seat version means you lose about half your boot in a vertical direction as they are sort of stuck on to the floor of the boot.
I would encourage anyone to try this car out, though, I was very impressed.
Buzzy
Surprisingly, it's a great car. It has a Mercedes engine (Ssangyong is 51% owned by Mercedes.) It feels really well made, much better than Hyundai or even Mitsubishi. It's got all the toys and rides really smoothly.
However we are ruling it out purely on the 7 seats as the 7 seat version means you lose about half your boot in a vertical direction as they are sort of stuck on to the floor of the boot.
I would encourage anyone to try this car out, though, I was very impressed.
Buzzy