Scottish Independence
#61
Re: Scottish Independence
I did not write what you quoted me as doing - not a word of it - how can you not understand that this is wrong!!!!!!!
Last chance to retract your fabrication else I will file a complaint - the evidence is there for admin and the mods to see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last chance to retract your fabrication else I will file a complaint - the evidence is there for admin and the mods to see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here goes with an attempt at quote cleaning .......
#63
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 43
Re: Scottish Independence
Scotland, as it is known today, was formed by territorial evolution during the Middle Ages. The Kingdom of Scotland fought a series of wars of independence against the Kingdom of England during the 14th century. The two monarchies formed a personal union in 1603 (the Union of the Crowns) when James VI of Scotland also became James I of England. The two nations were united under one government when Oliver Cromwell was declared Lord Protector of a Commonwealth in 1653, but it was dissolved when the monarchy was restored in 1660. The Kingdoms of Scotland and England united to form the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707. Great Britain in turn united with the Kingdom of Ireland in 1801 to form the United Kingdom. Most of Ireland left the Union in 1922, later forming the Republic of Ireland. Wales in not formally a part of the Union having been absorbed in its entirety by the Kingdom of England in 1563.
So if Scotland decides to secede from the Union there is no United Kingdom. Northern Ireland, the remnant of the old Kingdom of Ireland is not, per se, a Kingdom merely a Province similar to Wales.
So if Scotland decides to secede from the Union there is no United Kingdom. Northern Ireland, the remnant of the old Kingdom of Ireland is not, per se, a Kingdom merely a Province similar to Wales.
#65
Re: Scottish Independence
I did not write what you quoted me as doing - not a word of it - how can you not understand that this is wrong!!!!!!!
Last chance to retract your fabrication else I will file a complaint - the evidence is there for admin and the mods to see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last chance to retract your fabrication else I will file a complaint - the evidence is there for admin and the mods to see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#66
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: Lago di Como, Lombardia, Italia
Posts: 262
Re: Scottish Independence
Did you not write in RED
"wrong they will have to negotiate debt share"
and I wrote "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" and
combined your/mine in Post 40 as a response.
So you get "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway" (my quote) and "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" (yours) in one response.
something else comes to my mind !
"wrong they will have to negotiate debt share"
and I wrote "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" and
combined your/mine in Post 40 as a response.
So you get "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway" (my quote) and "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" (yours) in one response.
something else comes to my mind !
#67
Re: Scottish Independence
What is wrong
POST 39
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share
POST 40
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike View Post in POST 40
Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share
I cannot see anything that you have not written "you did write in RED in post 39 "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" or did you not??
Please get facts correct before saying I am distorting words in CONTEXT
POST 39
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike
Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share
POST 40
Originally Posted by Garbatellamike View Post in POST 40
Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share
I cannot see anything that you have not written "you did write in RED in post 39 "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" or did you not??
Please get facts correct before saying I am distorting words in CONTEXT
#69
Dunroaming back in UK
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Expat in Yorkshire now
Posts: 11,298
Re: Scottish Independence
Did you not write in RED
"wrong they will have to negotiate debt share"
and I wrote "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" and
combined your/mine in Post 40 as a response.
So you get "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway" (my quote) and "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" (yours) in one response.
something else comes to mind !
"wrong they will have to negotiate debt share"
and I wrote "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway. wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" and
combined your/mine in Post 40 as a response.
So you get "Scotland will have no debt at formation, but oil production worth billions. A new Norway" (my quote) and "wrong they will have to negotiate debt share" (yours) in one response.
something else comes to mind !
#70
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: Lago di Como, Lombardia, Italia
Posts: 262
Re: Scottish Independence
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
Maybe he should not put anything in RED next time and simply reply to avoid CONFUSION
#71
Dunroaming back in UK
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Expat in Yorkshire now
Posts: 11,298
Re: Scottish Independence
No I took the quote from Mike's response in 39 which is from 38 my words and his words in 39. The forum put this as his quote... this is technical error from the forum not mine. I am simply referring from the words in the previous post.
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
#73
Re: Scottish Independence
No I took the quote from Mike's response in 39 which is from 38 my words and his words in 39. The forum put this as his quote... this is technical error from the forum not mine. I am simply referring from the words in the previous post.
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
#74
Dunroaming back in UK
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Expat in Yorkshire now
Posts: 11,298
Re: Scottish Independence
No I took the quote from Mike's response in 39 which is from 38 my words and his words in 39. The forum put this as his quote... this is technical error from the forum not mine. I am simply referring from the words in the previous post.
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
Maybe he should not put anything in RED next time and simply reply to avoid CONFUSION
I did not change anything of the post but it was both mine and mike's combined.
Maybe he should not put anything in RED next time and simply reply to avoid CONFUSION