Lack of Clothes - again
#646
You read these things?
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,261
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
OOO, you said the dreaded 'M' word and English. Many poster here will think they are incompatible and that you are not truly British...
With regards to this thread, it is gradually turning into an anti-religion, anti-Islam by the posts as people are not discussing but thrashing about the Daily Mail's guide to Islam. Militant-atheists I'd say and yes, there are such people.
An article on equality and women in Islam in today's National which is a good, balanced article for people who are interested.
"However, the negative depictions of Muslim women are not phantoms. In some parts of the world women are oppressed and Islam should not be conflated with these cultural practices. Muslim women do need liberating, not from Islam but from their indigenous cultures"
With regards to this thread, it is gradually turning into an anti-religion, anti-Islam by the posts as people are not discussing but thrashing about the Daily Mail's guide to Islam. Militant-atheists I'd say and yes, there are such people.
An article on equality and women in Islam in today's National which is a good, balanced article for people who are interested.
"However, the negative depictions of Muslim women are not phantoms. In some parts of the world women are oppressed and Islam should not be conflated with these cultural practices. Muslim women do need liberating, not from Islam but from their indigenous cultures"
You won't hear that from the opposite end of the spectrum.
As for the National article, yes. The burka, niquab etc are not Islamic dress. They're Arabian bedouin dress – a cultural phenomenon.
#647
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Dubai, working at Dust World Central
Posts: 3,706
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
It's not difficult, the site provides a little picture icon in the top of the box when you reply. I'm sure you could manage it if you tried.
#649
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Again, insults after insults. I'm not going to boast by saying my points are amazing and back them up with .jpg picture files, but zero, I highly doubt it. Unless I've read all your posts, I cannot and will not make such generalisations. This by the way is something you are very good at I might add.
So you can't criticise my grammar and subsequently pick on the content that you don't like. Looks like you're the one with a chip and some shawarma on both your shoulders mate who's looking for an argument. I don't get a kick out of responding for the sake of it but when the information you've generally been brainwashed with is factually inaccurate, I am obliged to respond and clarify. Is that good enough for you Scampy?
Last post from me unless posters say something that needs to be clarified.
So you can't criticise my grammar and subsequently pick on the content that you don't like. Looks like you're the one with a chip and some shawarma on both your shoulders mate who's looking for an argument. I don't get a kick out of responding for the sake of it but when the information you've generally been brainwashed with is factually inaccurate, I am obliged to respond and clarify. Is that good enough for you Scampy?
Last post from me unless posters say something that needs to be clarified.
I haven't criticised your grammar either.
There is a lack of content, that's my point, you've not really offered anything credible.
I've not been brainwashed, I don't have a book (as good as it may be) telling me the way to live my life and how to deal with issues, how to ask for help etc etc.
Show me where I have been factually incorrect and you'll have my full apology....fundamentally though, your opinion on things against mine, which leads down a path to nowhere.
So, I think I should probably revert to the following (and this is an insult, just so you are aware in advance);
"Don't argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
#650
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
So have I got this right? Mathmatist and Desert Dweller (who actually lives in Wales) think that we will all be better people if we dress in a particular way and that showing some flesh in public makes us bad people? The rest of us pretty much think that our actions are what make us decent or not and that there are rather more important issues to get het up about?
#651
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 263
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Yes, there are militant atheists. The reason why they are tolerated is because they argue using logic, rather than blind faith. Many of the most militant atheists will the first to say "show me evidence of God, and I'll trust there is one; however, as me to believe on blind faith and I'll show you the door".
You won't hear that from the opposite end of the spectrum.
As for the National article, yes. The burka, niquab etc are not Islamic dress. They're Arabian bedouin dress – a cultural phenomenon.
You won't hear that from the opposite end of the spectrum.
As for the National article, yes. The burka, niquab etc are not Islamic dress. They're Arabian bedouin dress – a cultural phenomenon.
Some things had to be discovered with research and effort. The fact that that something came from nothing or randomly occured is mathematically, highly unlikely if next to impossible.
Also, one last thing, the argument if religion or atheism causing the most 'damage'. I don't recall Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot being pacifists and Nobel Peace Prize winners either. Communists that forced no religion upon people. Militant or terrorist atheists in other words. Forced labour, relocation and starvation aren't good things right?
#652
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 263
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
So have I got this right? Mathmatist and Desert Dweller (who actually lives in Wales) think that we will all be better people if we dress in a particular way and that showing some flesh in public makes us bad people? The rest of us pretty much think that our actions are what make us decent or not and that there are rather more important issues to get het up about?
Just as many guys and gals in the western world dress to go out to a party / beach / club hoping to pull if that's their intention, the concept of overt and then covert attracting is frowned upon here like in a mall.
Yes, it goes on subtly, but out of 'public' eyes such as in hotels and bars. It's these mixed messages that are confusing many people as what one poster said previously.
#653
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Dubai, working at Dust World Central
Posts: 3,706
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Also, one last thing, the argument if religion or atheism causing the most 'damage'. I don't recall Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot being pacifists and Nobel Peace Prize winners either. Communists that forced no religion upon people. Militant or terrorist atheists in other words. Forced labour, relocation and starvation aren't good things right?
#654
You read these things?
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,261
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Everything is made of energy, right? Now we know that energy can't be destroyed, only transferred. If it can't be destroyed, it can't have an end. If something doesn't have an end, then it's reasonable to assume that it never had a beginning.
It is beyond the ability of the human brain to comprehend something that has no beginning and no end. We need to rationalise things (which is ironically an irrational response when faced with such aspects of the universe).
One way that civilizations that lacked our understanding of the fundamental construction of the universe that was rationalising that some higher power created it all. But then you have the issue of who created him/her; and if it exists, then it will be composed of energy, which can't be destroyed or created. It just exists. See the paradox?
Also, one last thing, the argument if religion or atheism causing the most 'damage'. I don't recall Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot being pacifists and Nobel Peace Prize winners either. Communists that forced no religion upon people. Militant or terrorist atheists in other words. Forced labour, relocation and starvation aren't good things right?
What you also have to realise is that evil people will do evil things. They didn't do it because they were atheist. They did it because they could, and they would have done it if they were Christian/Muslim/Buddist/Hindu/Jedi...
Last edited by auzdafluff; Jun 25th 2012 at 8:08 am.
#655
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,132
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
One assumes you're talking creationism versus evolution. Your sentence is one often used by creationists. Not to get drawn into your 'debate' if your god made everything who/what made your god, nothing?
Did Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot (BTW you missed out Hitler as he is normally lumped in with this group, or have you read Mein Kampf and were aware that he was a Catholic) do those things for something they didn't believe in (religion) or were they done for political ends? Myself I reckon it was the moustaches, moustaches = godless heathen atheists.
Did Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot (BTW you missed out Hitler as he is normally lumped in with this group, or have you read Mein Kampf and were aware that he was a Catholic) do those things for something they didn't believe in (religion) or were they done for political ends? Myself I reckon it was the moustaches, moustaches = godless heathen atheists.
Ahhh Christianity - The belief that a 'Cosmic Jewish Zombie' (who was his own father), can make you live forever, provided that you drink his blood and eat his flesh (Symbolically). Not forgetting, Telepathic Communication with him; believing that he is your master, in order that he can remove the sin that is in all of us! – 6,500 Years ago when the world (apparently) began, a woman was convinced (by a talking snake), to eat fruit from a magic tree! – Does this seem plausible enough?
Mmmmm and that is just one version! – What about the Jewish Zombie's Mother?
#656
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Again, insults after insults. I'm not going to boast by saying my points are amazing and back them up with .jpg picture files, but zero, I highly doubt it. Unless I've read all your posts, I cannot and will not make such generalisations. This by the way is something you are very good at I might add.
So you can't criticise my grammar and subsequently pick on the content that you don't like. Looks like you're the one with a chip and some shawarma on both your shoulders mate who's looking for an argument. I don't get a kick out of responding for the sake of it but when the information you've generally been brainwashed with is factually inaccurate, I am obliged to respond and clarify. Is that good enough for you Scampy?
Last post from me unless posters say something that needs to be clarified.
So you can't criticise my grammar and subsequently pick on the content that you don't like. Looks like you're the one with a chip and some shawarma on both your shoulders mate who's looking for an argument. I don't get a kick out of responding for the sake of it but when the information you've generally been brainwashed with is factually inaccurate, I am obliged to respond and clarify. Is that good enough for you Scampy?
Last post from me unless posters say something that needs to be clarified.
#659
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
If you read my earlier posts about 40 or so pages ago, I did say that the way you dress doesn't necessarily make a good person or not, but in this part of the world, how you dress does determine how you are viewed. This, you can't deny even you strongly disagree with this.
Just as many guys and gals in the western world dress to go out to a party / beach / club hoping to pull if that's their intention, the concept of overt and then covert attracting is frowned upon here like in a mall.
Yes, it goes on subtly, but out of 'public' eyes such as in hotels and bars. It's these mixed messages that are confusing many people as what one poster said previously.
Just as many guys and gals in the western world dress to go out to a party / beach / club hoping to pull if that's their intention, the concept of overt and then covert attracting is frowned upon here like in a mall.
Yes, it goes on subtly, but out of 'public' eyes such as in hotels and bars. It's these mixed messages that are confusing many people as what one poster said previously.
A hotel/bar is a public place sweetie.
#660
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
If you read my earlier posts about 40 or so pages ago, I did say that the way you dress doesn't necessarily make a good person or not, but in this part of the world, how you dress does determine how you are viewed. This, you can't deny even you strongly disagree with this.
Just as many guys and gals in the western world dress to go out to a party / beach / club hoping to pull if that's their intention, the concept of overt and then covert attracting is frowned upon here like in a mall.
Yes, it goes on subtly, but out of Good Muslims eyes such as in hotels and bars. It's these mixed messages that are confusing many people as what one poster said previously.
Just as many guys and gals in the western world dress to go out to a party / beach / club hoping to pull if that's their intention, the concept of overt and then covert attracting is frowned upon here like in a mall.
Yes, it goes on subtly, but out of Good Muslims eyes such as in hotels and bars. It's these mixed messages that are confusing many people as what one poster said previously.