Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Scouse Express
(Post 9385887)
The chances of being hit by a Tornado, when you live in the middle of "Tornado Alley" aren't exactly remote.
Jim. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 9385886)
I thought wooden houses stood up better than brick in earthquakes as they flex. The shifting of brick houses means walls fall down and the mortar holding the bricks together rubs together and becomes sand, eventually falling down. Also, most brick houses out here have no foundations, so slide
Can't comment on tornado's though, can't imagine either structure would fair well. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Scouse Express
(Post 9385887)
The chances of being hit by a Tornado, when you live in the middle of "Tornado Alley" aren't exactly remote.
Jim. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 9385779)
Well to get a bit boring about it, it was a narrowish corridor that got damaged. The houses to either side were OK, you have to calculate the chances of being hit by the tornado and weight that against the cost of damages.
Originally Posted by S Folinsky
(Post 9385801)
I have noted that many of the pics show the surrounding structures still standing.
Even the brick buildings won't have a roof after a wind like that. As one living in Earthquake Country, I would rather be in a wood frame structure any day. There was an article in the LA Times this morning about a hospital there and the wind blew out the doors and windows. Also, one thing we have learned the hard way here in California is that how one joins the components of the building are important.
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 9385886)
I thought wooden houses stood up better than brick in earthquakes as they flex. The shifting of brick houses means walls fall down and the mortar holding the bricks together rubs together and becomes sand, eventually falling down. Also, most brick houses out here have no foundations, so slide
Can't comment on tornado's though, can't imagine either structure would fair well. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 9385894)
That may be so but to me it makes sense to build houses of more robust materials if you live in an area prone to tornadoes.
I understand that houses made of wood are preferable to those of brick in some areas. I'm talking about houses built in areas where a brick house would remain standing when bad weather hits vs a wooden house which is blown away. http://www.technewsdaily.com/rebuild...s-needed-2725/ Lots of these areas are extremely poor, and any roof over their heads is an advantage, what its made of doesn't really come into consideration. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 9385900)
Interesting little article, saying the most tornado proof house's are made of styrofoam bricks with concrete poured inside. I remember seeing this method used on Grand Designs, but can't imagine why, it obviously wasn't to survive tornados.
http://www.technewsdaily.com/rebuild...s-needed-2725/ Lots of these areas are extremely poor, and any roof over their heads is an advantage, what its made of doesn't really come into consideration. I don't think many houses even in the UK are built with brick now. At most they will have a brick facing. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 9385891)
I've just read 'tornados hit a given location once in 5,000 years on average' that seems remote to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...nado_outbreaks Jim. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9385905)
Yes that's interesting. Cost is the major factor.
I don't think many houses even in the UK are built with brick now. At most they will have a brick facing. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 9385914)
I admit I have lost touch with how new houses are built in the UK. Are homes no longer made of a layer of brick and another layer of breeze block? Are you saying they are made of timber because not that many years ago you couldn't get a mortgage or insurance for a timber framed house?
|
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Depending on location and what the local natural disasters are, sometimes one makes more sense than the other.
Timber tends to be cheaper though and pretty good for earthquake zones, not so great for wind zones, where it's the seal of the house that's important, roof or window goes and a vacuum effect can crush a flexible house in. Much better building tech these days than just wood though, places like Japan have invested in the stuff more, because they suffer it more frequently, but also because they tend to rebuild houses on a fairly regular basis to get them up to code. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by N1cky
(Post 9385900)
Interesting little article, saying the most tornado proof house's are made of styrofoam bricks with concrete poured inside. I remember seeing this method used on Grand Designs, but can't imagine why, it obviously wasn't to survive tornados.
|
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 9385956)
I used to watch Grand Designs all the time. I was convinced that the host (can't remember his name) was having an affair with the female half of all the home builders because they always seemed to end up pregnant.
Had to google his name though - Kevin McCloud. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 9385956)
I used to watch Grand Designs all the time. I was convinced that the host (can't remember his name) was having an affair with the female half of all the home builders because they always seemed to end up pregnant.
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9385963)
I fancied him :lol:
Had to google his name though - Kevin McCloud. I love that show, watched the latest series recently whuch was mainly revisited ones. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 9385829)
I love old houses for those reasons. Also the traditional adobe construction of this area withstands earthquakes and keeps the house cool. The modern approach takes little or no account of local conditions.
During a class project many moons ago we went to the Leonis Rancho and packed mud/straw into cracks and also made bricks with the same materials. |
Re: Wood vs Brick built houses
I agree that in an F1-F2 tornado brick will probably still be standing even if the roof is gone. F3 probably depends on the proximity to the worst of the wind but F4 or F5 it just doesn't matter. Anything but poured concrete will sustain severe damage or worse.
This is a very interesting link (Really, it's worth a look;)) containing the history and pictures of the aftermath of the St. Louis, MO tornado of 1896. At that time, St. Louis was built pimarily out of brick. Two older (Built in 1915 and 1926) St. Louis homes I've lived in had solid brick walls with the inside of the exterior walls covered with plaster. I'm sure the construction of the buildings shown in the link was similar. The 1896 tornado was rated F4 at maximum wind velocity. http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/count...clone/1896.htm Here are a couple examples taken from the link. http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/count...hn-nepomuk.jpg http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/count...l-lutheran.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:52 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.