Wills and things....
#17
Re: Wills and things....
I recently listened to a presentation about making wills, and something came up which made me think:
You may have made arrangements with family members as who should care for your children in the unlikely event that they are orphaned - but to avoid legal delays and perhaps even a spell in state care, this should be written into your will. Also if you have designated a family member who lives some distance away, one should also designate (formally) a friend or neighbour who will care for your children in the short term. This also applies if you are temporarily out of commission due to accident or illness.
You may have made arrangements with family members as who should care for your children in the unlikely event that they are orphaned - but to avoid legal delays and perhaps even a spell in state care, this should be written into your will. Also if you have designated a family member who lives some distance away, one should also designate (formally) a friend or neighbour who will care for your children in the short term. This also applies if you are temporarily out of commission due to accident or illness.
#18
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,913
Re: Wills and things....
While you should most definitely make your wishes known it is also important to understand that your children are not "property" and that having something "written into your will" is nether necessary or sufficient to ensure that your wishes with regard to the custody of your minor children will be taken into account in the event of your death or temporary incapacity.
#19
Re: Wills and things....
That said, assuming your U.K. will is an English one, it could probably be accepted in most U.S. states on an out of jurisdiction basis. Same goes, if you make a North Carolina will, it should normally be acceptable elsewhere. But if it's important, you need to get advice from an attorney in the jurisdiction where you would present the "non-local" will.
I’ve read various articles and threads here about having two wills and it seems there are a lot of different opinions on the matter – I would have thought if they were identical it wouldn’t be a problem, but who knows? My UK solicitor doesn’t seem to and has suggested I contact a US attorney as it is all related to your current domicile.
For this reason, it's a very good idea to replace your U.K. will with a U.S. will, if you intend to remain permanently in the United States. It would also be a good idea to become a U.S. citizen. You may also wish to consider whether you should divest of U.K. assets (which removes the need for any U.K. probate purposes) and consider whether you should renew your British passport after you become a U.S. citizen.
I think this sounds like a lot of money (especially if I move states I might have to do it all again?) – so I was wondering what other people had done and how much it had cost them?
#21
Re: Wills and things....
They issue no passports, nor visas, they have no armed forces, they have no embassies (or their own, nor receive any from overseas) nor a UN presence, they have no central bank, and issue no currency, their regional governments have limited authority delegated from London. On what objective basis could anyone think they are countries?
#22
Re: Wills and things....
They issue no passports, nor visas, they have no armed forces, they have no embassies (or their own, nor receive any from overseas) nor a UN presence, they have no central bank, and issue no currency, their regional governments have limited authority delegated from London. On what objective basis could anyone think they are countries?
#23
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,913
Re: Wills and things....
Firstly I am not sure that everything that people "think" necessarily has to have an "objective basis" but, in the case of Scotland, at least, I can assure you that a very large number of people do think of it as being a "country" - including, but not limited to, most of the people that live there.
The basis of this is quite simply that Scotland never ceased to be a "country" even after the Act of Union of 1707 but simply became a part of what ultimately evolved in to the United Kingdom - and of course, to this day, it still has its own legal system, which was the original point at issue here.
The basis of this is quite simply that Scotland never ceased to be a "country" even after the Act of Union of 1707 but simply became a part of what ultimately evolved in to the United Kingdom - and of course, to this day, it still has its own legal system, which was the original point at issue here.
#24
Re: Wills and things....
Firstly I am not sure that everything that people "think" necessarily has to have an "objective basis" but, in the case of Scotland, at least, I can assure you that a very large number of people do think of it as being a "country" - including, but not limited to, most of the people that live there.
The basis of this is quite simply that Scotland never ceased to be a "country" even after the Act of Union of 1707 but simply became a part of what ultimately evolved in to the United Kingdom - and of course, to this day, it still has its own legal system, which was the original point at issue here.
The basis of this is quite simply that Scotland never ceased to be a "country" even after the Act of Union of 1707 but simply became a part of what ultimately evolved in to the United Kingdom - and of course, to this day, it still has its own legal system, which was the original point at issue here.
#25
BE Forum Addict
Joined: May 2012
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 4,993
Re: Wills and things....
I'm in two minds, because while I know people do it, it may open up unintended ambiguities, as a will is, to give it its full title, your "last will and testament", and usually includes wording that this will replaces all prior wills. So you could inadvertently void your British will by writing a subsequent US will, or vice versa. Also you can't have two different documents that are both "the last ... ".
If the beneficiaries under both wills are mostly the same, with the same remainder man, then the risk might be small, but the remainder man (person who gets "everything else") under the later dated will could try to challenge the earlier will in the other country, arguing that what is listed in it is part of the "everything else".
If the beneficiaries under both wills are mostly the same, with the same remainder man, then the risk might be small, but the remainder man (person who gets "everything else") under the later dated will could try to challenge the earlier will in the other country, arguing that what is listed in it is part of the "everything else".
As a matter of strict policy, my firm never gave advice on the legal position of Wills in the clients' home countries - except to recommend that they have "home" Wills, drawn up by "home" solicitors. I never heard of a case where the tax officials in the home countries tried to tax the assets in Cayman; perhaps they just never found out about them. But it stands to reason (as Pulaski points out) that without careful wording, any later Will must always be "the last Will" and would supersede any earlier one if it so specifies.
Incidentally, a point to note for married couples: if both die in the same accident, the law usually presumes that the older of the two dies first. So if they both have Wills, and each leaves everything to the other and names the other as the sole executor, then it might well be left to a court of law to appoint an administrator.
#28
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Re: Wills and things....
Thanks everyone for your replies - plenty to think about!