Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 2:43 pm
  #76  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by windsong
I hate this Windfall Provision. Why the US SS payment would be reduced because of another pension in another country is typical US BS. One country's pension should not impact any pension you get from another country - ethically, that is.
Isn't it a consequence of the fact that you only need 10 years contributions to get a full SS pension in the USA?
JAJ is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 3:02 pm
  #77  
Ping-ponger
Thread Starter
 
dunroving's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Dreich Alba
Posts: 12,006
dunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by JAJ
Isn't it a consequence of the fact that you only need 10 years contributions to get a full SS pension in the USA?
I don't think 40 quarters gives you a "full" SS pension, it only makes you eligible to receive any SS pension at all (so it's like a minimum qualifying contribution period).

My understanding is that if you paid a greater annual amount of SS (i.e., if you had a higher salary) and if you paid for longer (more years beyond the 40 quarter/10 year minimum), you get more in your monthly SS pension.
dunroving is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 3:13 pm
  #78  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
windsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by dunroving
I don't think 40 quarters gives you a "full" SS pension, it only makes you eligible to receive any SS pension at all (so it's like a minimum qualifying contribution period).

My understanding is that if you paid a greater annual amount of SS (i.e., if you had a higher salary) and if you paid for longer (more years beyond the 40 quarter/10 year minimum), you get more in your monthly SS pension.
I have paid in over 30 years SS in the U.S. What I don't know is whether the amount the statement says I will receive when I am 62 will vary from now on based on my earnings over the next few years.
windsong is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 3:21 pm
  #79  
Heading for Poppyland
 
robin1234's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
robin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by windsong
I have paid in over 30 years SS in the U.S. What I don't know is whether the amount the statement says I will receive when I am 62 will vary from now on based on my earnings over the next few years.
Yes it will. The SS use your "best" 30 years, applying an inflation factor to earlier years in order to compare them to recent or future years' income. (For instance.. just a wild example.. the SS might say that the $25,000 you earned in 1980 is a better year's income than the $40,000 you earned in 2010, because of inflation.)

So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
robin1234 is online now  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 3:26 pm
  #80  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
windsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by robin1234
Yes it will. The SS use your "best" 30 years, applying an inflation factor to earlier years in order to compare them to recent or future years' income. (For instance.. just a wild example.. the SS might say that the $25,000 you earned in 1980 is a better year's income than the $40,000 you earned in 2010, because of inflation.)

So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
Thank you.
windsong is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 3:33 pm
  #81  
Ping-ponger
Thread Starter
 
dunroving's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Dreich Alba
Posts: 12,006
dunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by robin1234
Yes it will. The SS use your "best" 30 years, applying an inflation factor to earlier years in order to compare them to recent or future years' income. (For instance.. just a wild example.. the SS might say that the $25,000 you earned in 1980 is a better year's income than the $40,000 you earned in 2010, because of inflation.)

So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
Robin, does the forecast assume that you will continue contributing until you reach 30+ years? (I'm assuming the answer is probably Yes).

I can't put my hand on my previous statements, all I know is that I squeaked under the 10 years/40 quarters threshold just before I left the US. If I never get to return (still working on it ....), I'd collect based on 40 quarters, which is why I'm asking. Either way, my plan is to continue contributing NI (even if I leave the UK) and collect UK and US state pension when I retire (US will be based on 40 quarters or whatever level I reach if I get to move back).
dunroving is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:15 pm
  #82  
The Kwisatz Haderach
 
Mummy in the foothills's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: North Wales
Posts: 8,080
Mummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond reputeMummy in the foothills has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by JAJ
Isn't it a consequence of the fact that you only need 10 years contributions to get a full SS pension in the USA?
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
Mummy in the foothills is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:19 pm
  #83  
Ping-ponger
Thread Starter
 
dunroving's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Dreich Alba
Posts: 12,006
dunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond reputedunroving has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by Mummy in the foothills
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
That's better than the approximately £400 pcm you get for a full UK state pension, though (your husband's SS pension, I mean).
dunroving is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:32 pm
  #84  
Heading for Poppyland
 
robin1234's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
robin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by dunroving
Robin, does the forecast assume that you will continue contributing until you reach 30+ years? (I'm assuming the answer is probably Yes).
...........
Mine assumes I will continue contributing until retirement age, which would be less than 30 years of credits unless I don't retire until age 67+ (I'm 60 and plan to retire end of 2012.)... As you know, these things are a clever mix of "boilerplate" text and text that is tailored to your situation. On my most recent one, It states;
"You have earned enough credits to qualify for benefits. At you current earnings rate, if you continue working until... your full retirement age (66 years), your payment would be about...$$$" (it gives four different age examples)
In your case, not currently working in the US, maybe that text is differently worded and assumes you have ceased earning credits?
robin1234 is online now  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:46 pm
  #85  
In the pink
 
Mallory's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 3,324
Mallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond reputeMallory has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by Mummy in the foothills
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
You will draw on your husband's SS, and you will get 50% of what he gets. Not bad to get $1000 a month! When you get to full pension age, if DH were to die, you will revert to his SS pension amount.
Mallory is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:47 pm
  #86  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
windsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by dunroving
That's better than the approximately £400 pcm you get for a full UK state pension, though (your husband's SS pension, I mean).
I will never know how UK OAPs live on this amount if they have a mortgage or rent to pay. It's impossible.
windsong is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 4:49 pm
  #87  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
windsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by Mummy in the foothills
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
$2000 a months is very good. Mine was good, too, until the last 10 years. It's down to about $1578 a month if I start collecting at 62.

Are you saying that if I draw a company pension, it will reduce the amount I will get from SS?
windsong is offline  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 5:05 pm
  #88  
Heading for Poppyland
 
robin1234's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
robin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by windsong
$2000 a months is very good. Mine was good, too, until the last 10 years. It's down to about $1578 a month if I start collecting at 62.

Are you saying that if I draw a company pension, it will reduce the amount I will get from SS?
In general, no it won't reduce the SS. This is a complex area (the Windfall Elimination Provision, discussed earlier in this thread and other recent threads.)

In general terms, if your company pension is from years that you also contributed to the SS (from your posts I think this is the case,) then you will not suffer the penalty (reduction of SS.)

The WEP comes in to play for pensions that apply to employment that did not pay into US Social Security ...examples would be working in Massachusetts in local government, or working in a foreign country such as England.
robin1234 is online now  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 5:14 pm
  #89  
Heading for Poppyland
 
robin1234's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
robin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond reputerobin1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by windsong
I will never know how UK OAPs live on this amount if they have a mortgage or rent to pay. It's impossible.
In the UK as in the US, it is assumed that most people have other sources of income in retirement (company pension, savings & investments, part-time work etc.) Also, I think most people factor into their retirement planning retirement of all debt; i.e. as they get closer to retirement, they pay off their mortgage, eliminate car payments etc., even if that means they have to live a simpler lifestyle. If they are renters, for instance in a council property, their rent would be low and adjusted to their lower income in retirement.

Bottom line is (in my experience)... it is necessary to plan ahead and possibly sacrifice current expenditure in the decade or more leading up to retirement.
robin1234 is online now  
Old Jan 2nd 2011, 6:23 pm
  #90  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
windsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond reputewindsong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement

Originally Posted by robin1234
In the UK as in the US, it is assumed that most people have other sources of income in retirement (company pension, savings & investments, part-time work etc.) Also, I think most people factor into their retirement planning retirement of all debt; i.e. as they get closer to retirement, they pay off their mortgage, eliminate car payments etc., even if that means they have to live a simpler lifestyle. If they are renters, for instance in a council property, their rent would be low and adjusted to their lower income in retirement.

Bottom line is (in my experience)... it is necessary to plan ahead and possibly sacrifice current expenditure in the decade or more leading up to retirement.
Yes, I agree. I should be okay I think, although rent will take a huge portion of my income, almost 50%, I think. I will have my US SS of $1578 a month if I start drawing it at 62 and then when I stop working at 65 I will begin to draw my company pension which will be $850 at that time. I also want to pay in a few years to UK NI to receive a little tiny pension from the UK as well.
windsong is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.