Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
#76
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
Isn't it a consequence of the fact that you only need 10 years contributions to get a full SS pension in the USA?
#77
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
My understanding is that if you paid a greater annual amount of SS (i.e., if you had a higher salary) and if you paid for longer (more years beyond the 40 quarter/10 year minimum), you get more in your monthly SS pension.
#78
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
I don't think 40 quarters gives you a "full" SS pension, it only makes you eligible to receive any SS pension at all (so it's like a minimum qualifying contribution period).
My understanding is that if you paid a greater annual amount of SS (i.e., if you had a higher salary) and if you paid for longer (more years beyond the 40 quarter/10 year minimum), you get more in your monthly SS pension.
My understanding is that if you paid a greater annual amount of SS (i.e., if you had a higher salary) and if you paid for longer (more years beyond the 40 quarter/10 year minimum), you get more in your monthly SS pension.
#79
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
#80
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
Yes it will. The SS use your "best" 30 years, applying an inflation factor to earlier years in order to compare them to recent or future years' income. (For instance.. just a wild example.. the SS might say that the $25,000 you earned in 1980 is a better year's income than the $40,000 you earned in 2010, because of inflation.)
So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
#81
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
Yes it will. The SS use your "best" 30 years, applying an inflation factor to earlier years in order to compare them to recent or future years' income. (For instance.. just a wild example.. the SS might say that the $25,000 you earned in 1980 is a better year's income than the $40,000 you earned in 2010, because of inflation.)
So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
So, if you have high-earning years over the next 3 or 4 years before your retirement, then they will displace possibly lower income years that you had decades ago. This would raise your estimated annual payment at age 62 (or age 65 or 66 or whenever you choose to start your SS payments.)
I can't put my hand on my previous statements, all I know is that I squeaked under the 10 years/40 quarters threshold just before I left the US. If I never get to return (still working on it ....), I'd collect based on 40 quarters, which is why I'm asking. Either way, my plan is to continue contributing NI (even if I leave the UK) and collect UK and US state pension when I retire (US will be based on 40 quarters or whatever level I reach if I get to move back).
#82
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
#83
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
#84
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
"You have earned enough credits to qualify for benefits. At you current earnings rate, if you continue working until... your full retirement age (66 years), your payment would be about...$$$" (it gives four different age examples)
In your case, not currently working in the US, maybe that text is differently worded and assumes you have ceased earning credits?
#85
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
#86
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
#87
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
I have 13 or 14 years in here in SS payments, part time raising kids, low wages over the years and I'm eligible, I should get $1.75 per month or something crazy like that. You have to have a decent income for those 10 years to get anything worth collecting.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
Dh has 32 years and will only get a little more than $2000 a month and that will be reduced cause he will get a Union pension too.
Are you saying that if I draw a company pension, it will reduce the amount I will get from SS?
#88
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
In general terms, if your company pension is from years that you also contributed to the SS (from your posts I think this is the case,) then you will not suffer the penalty (reduction of SS.)
The WEP comes in to play for pensions that apply to employment that did not pay into US Social Security ...examples would be working in Massachusetts in local government, or working in a foreign country such as England.
#89
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,543
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
Bottom line is (in my experience)... it is necessary to plan ahead and possibly sacrifice current expenditure in the decade or more leading up to retirement.
#90
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,100
Re: Retirement - US Soc Sec, UK Nat Ins, and the Totalization Agreement
In the UK as in the US, it is assumed that most people have other sources of income in retirement (company pension, savings & investments, part-time work etc.) Also, I think most people factor into their retirement planning retirement of all debt; i.e. as they get closer to retirement, they pay off their mortgage, eliminate car payments etc., even if that means they have to live a simpler lifestyle. If they are renters, for instance in a council property, their rent would be low and adjusted to their lower income in retirement.
Bottom line is (in my experience)... it is necessary to plan ahead and possibly sacrifice current expenditure in the decade or more leading up to retirement.
Bottom line is (in my experience)... it is necessary to plan ahead and possibly sacrifice current expenditure in the decade or more leading up to retirement.