British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   USA (https://britishexpats.com/forum/usa-57/)
-   -   Poverty in the USA (https://britishexpats.com/forum/usa-57/poverty-usa-748389/)

Giantaxe Feb 15th 2012 2:54 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by Marocco (Post 9903410)
Not to mention that they make no economic sense whatsoever.

The jury's out on that one. Some studies have said that; some have concluded that by putting a floor on wages, it increases demand in the economy as people typically spend all of their income at those wage levels.

There's a bunch of papers here:

http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/research/minimumwage.html

fatbrit Feb 15th 2012 4:11 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by ian-mstm (Post 9902601)
Yes... on the assumption the person's skill set is worth that much! A cardiologist should not earn the same as a Walmart greeter... indeed, the cardiologist should earn considerably more! A person's earning capacity should be based on his ability.

Since you mention it though, I also believe there should be no minimum wage. Minimum wage is a lot like affirmative action... both are insulting.

Ian

You assume that a person earns money in a vacuum. I suppose some people do, but it's quite unusual. Mrs FB for example works solely for herself: she buys materials on the open market, adds value to them thorough her labour and skill, and then sells the final product or rights to it on the open market. Her product is a luxury, not a necessity. There should, indeed, be no limit to what she can earn.

The guy with the crazy salary I quoted earlier, however, is the CEO of United Healthcare. Healthcare is not open, is a necessity, and the CEO works with many of thousands of other people within the company to allow it to function.

Stepping over the lack of openness in the market and necessity for folks to be given access to healthcare (both big issues!), I believe he should have no limit to his earnings, either. However, that remuneration cannot be solely on the backs of his co-workers. He earns 20 times, 30 times or even 50 times what the cleaner of his office does, fine! He earns 10,000 times as much and we have a very big issue.

HumphreyC Feb 15th 2012 4:14 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by Bob (Post 9902719)
Thing is, it can take 6 months to get section 8 housing in MA, so you could be homeless by then.

It takes at least 3 months to get food stamps and about that for WIC to come through.

If you're looking for help to get childcare costs, there's a waiting list of 3 years.

Aye that's true. But even then we still aren't quite into Private Baldrick territory given the other help on offer.


Originally Posted by Englishmum (Post 9902527)
Not necessarily. I've been in Newark, New Jersey (Brazilian National Day) and was offered a guinea pig to eat from a street barbie. It was on a skewer and still had the flipping head, ears and tail on it. I shuddered...and passed on the offer.

Wow - I knew those were a delicacy in South America but I didn't know you could buy roasted ones in Newark. I used to have 3 guinea pigs growing up called Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky and to be honest they were rubbish pets (2 of them copped it pretty quickly and the cat ate the last one). Perhaps I would have been better sticking them on the Barbeque.

ian-mstm Feb 15th 2012 6:50 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by fatbrit (Post 9903770)
There should, indeed, be no limit to what she can earn.

I agree 100%.



I believe he should have no limit to his earnings, either. However, that remuneration cannot be solely on the backs of his co-workers. He earns 20 times, 30 times or even 50 times what the cleaner of his office does, fine!
Those who decide such things, have decided he has the skills and abilities to warrant that sort of salary. If the cleaner has those same skills and abilities, then I submit his life is being wasted and he should look elsewhere for work.

There's also the other side of the coin... people like me, who are sitting at the top of Mazlow's Heirarchy. I work because I want to and because I enjoy what I'm doing - the pay isn't great, and I could get 2x or 3x as much in the private sector... but I'm content applying my skills at this level. I enjoy the interaction with my coworkers and with our graduate students. I've gone back to school myself, because I can. I don't need a PhD to further my career, and I'm fully qualified for what I do... but I'd like to get a PhD anyway.

Don't get me wrong, I think it's tragic that people can't make ends meet... but many (although certainly not all) of those people have unrealistic expectations. They believe they should be paid more than they're skills are worth, and then they whine about the inequities of life because they're unwilling to face the truth about themselves.

Ian

fatbrit Feb 15th 2012 6:55 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by ian-mstm (Post 9904042)
Those who decide such things, have decided he has the skills and abilities to warrant that sort of salary. If the cleaner has those same skills and abilities, then I submit his life is being wasted and he should look elsewhere for work.

And who are those who decide such things?

nethead Feb 15th 2012 6:59 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by fatbrit (Post 9904049)
And who are those who decide such things?

Exactly, who decides what someone's skills are worth, why shouldn't a k-12 teacher earn the same as a CEO?

MrBaker2011 Feb 15th 2012 8:56 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by nethead (Post 9904054)
Exactly, who decides what someone's skills are worth, why shouldn't a k-12 teacher earn the same as a CEO?

I'm not sure how comparable the two are in business terms as one has the potential to earn a corporation millions in profits and the other doesn't, although the teacher may arguably perform a more socially and societally (is that a word...) beneficial job.

This does raise the point of whether a persons earnings should be based purely on creating wealth, or on a person's ability to improve society, the environment etc..... Unfortunately money making is the key (and often only) in these things.

Perhaps more approriate to compare workers within a single company.... There is a hierarchy for a valid reason (I guess....) and yet the people at the top can't exist without the pee-ons who actually do all the work - that is what smarts for the average worker - all the hard work for none of the reward

nethead Feb 15th 2012 9:25 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by MrBaker2011 (Post 9904223)
I'm not sure how comparable the two are in business terms as one has the potential to earn a corporation millions in profits and the other doesn't, although the teacher may arguably perform a more socially and societally (is that a word...) beneficial job.

This does raise the point of whether a persons earnings should be based purely on creating wealth, or on a person's ability to improve society, the environment etc..... Unfortunately money making is the key (and often only) in these things.

Perhaps more approriate to compare workers within a single company.... There is a hierarchy for a valid reason (I guess....) and yet the people at the top can't exist without the pee-ons who actually do all the work - that is what smarts for the average worker - all the hard work for none of the reward

But the teacher could teach the child the skills or give the inspiration to go on and make millions. Personally I don't believe it should be assessed only on the ability to make money.

ian-mstm Feb 15th 2012 9:30 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by fatbrit (Post 9904049)
And who are those who decide such things?

I'm guessing, since he's a CEO, that the Board of Directors decides such things.

Ian

ian-mstm Feb 15th 2012 9:40 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by nethead (Post 9904054)
Exactly, who decides what someone's skills are worth...

The individual decides what his skills are worth. If he chooses to work for an employer that pays less than that, that's his choice. If he can't stomach the salary, he can go into business for himself.



... why shouldn't a k-12 teacher earn the same as a CEO?
As a former K-12 teacher, I'd very much like to have been paid the same as a CEO... but I chose to accept what the Board of Education was willing to pay me.

But since you brought it up... for the answer to why a K-12 teacher doesn't earn the same as a CEO (much as I believe they should), one need only look at how schools boards are funded.

Ian

MrBaker2011 Feb 15th 2012 9:46 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by nethead (Post 9904293)
But the teacher could teach the child the skills or give the inspiration to go on and make millions. Personally I don't believe it should be assessed only on the ability to make money.

Essentially, that is what I was getting at. Sadly this is more than a little ideological - the world can't work that way as the money to pay the teacher has to come from somewhere, and unfortunately there is very little we can do to change that. Maybe the teacher should get a bonus if the kid they teach becomes a millionaire....

ian-mstm Feb 15th 2012 9:48 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by MrBaker2011 (Post 9904223)
... that is what smarts for the average worker - all the hard work for none of the reward

On the contrary, their paycheck is their reward. That is what they traded their skills for. Those who enjoy what they're doing understand that. Those who feel they sold out, are angry with themselves for accepting less than they believe they're worth. But instead of being mature and accepting responsibility for their actions, they whine about the inequities of life to all and sundry. They can either live with their situation, or work to improve it... their choice.

Ian

garfro Feb 15th 2012 9:51 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by ian-mstm (Post 9903538)
Indeed! Some people will also earn more because they not only have greater ability, they're also smarter - which is different than "better educated".



For the record, I'm not a Republican... so I dismiss your earlier "right wing" comment.

Ian

maybe not but you sound like one, probably because you live in Kentucky and are surrounded by them.
and dont even get me started on what a drain your state and others are on society..... (real americans HAHA)
when you dont really matter
what do you make in Kentucky that benefits anybody?
Cannon fodder for endless wars!!!

garfro Feb 15th 2012 9:52 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by ian-mstm (Post 9904354)
On the contrary, their paycheck is their reward. That is what they traded their skills for. Those who enjoy what they're doing understand that. Those who feel they sold out, are angry with themselves for accepting less than they believe they're worth. But instead of being mature and accepting responsibility for their actions, they whine about the inequities of life to all and sundry. They can either live with their situation, or work to improve it... their choice.

Ian

dont forget the Cadillac healthcare package!!!

MrBaker2011 Feb 15th 2012 9:54 am

Re: Poverty in the USA
 

Originally Posted by ian-mstm (Post 9904354)
On the contrary, their paycheck is their reward. That is what they traded their skills for. Those who enjoy what they're doing understand that. Those who feel they sold out, are angry with themselves for accepting less than they believe they're worth. But instead of being mature and accepting responsibility for their actions, they whine about the inequities of life to all and sundry. They can either live with their situation, or work to improve it... their choice.

Ian

This is true, it is a free market economy. But when you are in that position it is difficult to appreciate.

Unfortunately, our society has got to a level where too many want what they can't afford and feel that they have a right to it.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:44 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.