Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Let them smoke

Let them smoke

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 9th 2004, 11:19 am
  #1  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,894
doctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to beholddoctor scrumpy is a splendid one to behold
Default Let them smoke

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040609/140/evjvi.html

And I always thought it was let them eat cake ?
doctor scrumpy is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 11:42 am
  #2  
You Are All Diseased
 
rincewind's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 4,511
rincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond repute
Default

So what is their definition of "smoking in public?"

Does it mean anywhere outside of your own home?

Man this is getting ridiculous.
rincewind is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 12:44 pm
  #3  
Maño-Americano
 
ironporer's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: In the heart of the Ozarks
Posts: 10,216
ironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Let them smoke

Originally posted by doctor scrumpy
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040609/140/evjvi.html

"What enjoyment does a 21-year-old single mother of three living in a council sink estate get? The only enjoyment sometimes they have is to have a cigarette."
Evidently she has some other pass-times to have 3 kids by age 21. Guess she needs the smoke when they get done.

I imagine here in the States it will be illegal or child abuse soon for a parent to smoke at home with kids in the house.
In GA now you can not smoke in a car with a child- unless the window is open.
ironporer is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 1:49 pm
  #4  
You Are All Diseased
 
rincewind's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 4,511
rincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond reputerincewind has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I'm in Bulloch County, Georgia and they have just made it illegal to smoke in restaurants here.

I can't enjoy a cigarette after my hash browns and coffee in the Waffle House now
rincewind is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 4:25 pm
  #5  
"Where are the shovels?"
 
jambo_2004's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 568
jambo_2004 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I agree with it and not before time. The health secretaries analogy is quite intresting though. I really feel sorry for the dole scroungers (there's no way his 21 year old with three kids works) if they have to give up the only pleasure in their lives, (aside from the big screen telly, DVD player and XBOX that is) It's intresting how certain unemployed people (talking of the schemie variety so don't flame me) can aford to buy 20 cigs a day. Yes it's selfish to try and remove something that costs billions to the British tax payer and puts a massive strain on the NHS isnt it? After all that's what a welfare state like Britain is for...so let them have their "only pleasure in life" and don't worry, the tax payer will pay for their lung cancer treatment and funeral costs when they snuff it later!
jambo_2004 is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 4:56 pm
  #6  
Maño-Americano
 
ironporer's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: In the heart of the Ozarks
Posts: 10,216
ironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally posted by jambo_2004
how certain unemployed people (talking of the schemie variety so don't flame me) can aford to buy 20 cigs a day. Yes it's selfish to try and remove something that costs billions to the British tax payer and puts a massive strain on the NHS isnt it?
Actually it's a fallacy that smokers cost the system more.
1.) Smokers pay a tremendous amount of tax on the tobacco they consume, adding to the public kitty.
2.) Smokers die on average 15 years before their non-smoking counterparts. For every 1 that reaches chronic stage and has cancer, COPD or heart disease (and thus run up the bill) 50 more have dies in their 50's or 60's- well before they have begun to cost the gov't big bucks.

In essence, we neeed MORE smokers to balance the budget.
ironporer is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 5:08 pm
  #7  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 961
effi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud ofeffi has much to be proud of
Default Re: Let them smoke

Originally posted by ironporer
Evidently she has some other pass-times to have 3 kids by age 21. Guess she needs the smoke when they get done.

I imagine here in the States it will be illegal or child abuse soon for a parent to smoke at home with kids in the house.
In GA now you can not smoke in a car with a child- unless the window is open.
Smoking in the home here in the US is considered a form of Child Abuse.
effi is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 5:13 pm
  #8  
@matthewb76
 
Manc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 21,886
Manc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally posted by ironporer
Actually it's a fallacy that smokers cost the system more.
1.) Smokers pay a tremendous amount of tax on the tobacco they consume, adding to the public kitty.
2.) Smokers die on average 15 years before their non-smoking counterparts. For every 1 that reaches chronic stage and has cancer, COPD or heart disease (and thus run up the bill) 50 more have dies in their 50's or 60's- well before they have begun to cost the gov't big bucks.

In essence, we neeed MORE smokers to balance the budget.
I agree to a certain extent IP, BUT...........

in Britain, I have absolutely no doubt that her ciggies are coming out of her welfare check......
Manc is offline  
Old Jun 9th 2004, 5:19 pm
  #9  
Maño-Americano
 
ironporer's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: In the heart of the Ozarks
Posts: 10,216
ironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally posted by manc1976
I agree to a certain extent IP, BUT...........

in Britain, I have absolutely no doubt that her ciggies are coming out of her welfare check......

Maybe they ought to double their cig ration, even give em free heroin too- kinda like a benevolant (or Malevolant) welfare reform??
Free booze, free cigs, free smack, hopefully theey "drop" off the dole in 4-5 years.
ironporer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.