![]() |
Re: Concorde
I'd certainly buy them :)
|
Re: Concorde
When at uni, it had a rotating landing path and for about a week every so often, it would fly over the uni and shake the crap out of the place.
Was quite nice to watch though. Oh and apparently because of it, we also didn't have mobile phone reception on campus because it had some sort of landing beacon on one of the building roofs, so you could only get reception on the bog in a particular corner building :/ |
Re: Concorde
Yeah I was in the car park at Terminal 4 once at the end of the runway when Concorde went over, it was only a few hundred feet above me and the noise was ear-splitting.
|
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 10961647)
Yeah I was in the car park at Terminal 4 once at the end of the runway when Concorde went over, it was only a few hundred feet above me and the noise was ear-splitting.
|
Re: Concorde
I saw it fly overhead when it did a 'tour' of the US and the idiots were out protesting it.
I saw an interview of the chief pilot, he said it was amazingly stable to fly, mach 2 steering with two fingers. So cool. Pete |
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by Yorkieabroad
(Post 10961093)
Those match my main regrets too...along with never seeing Queen live....the band that is, not the lady...met her once, and couldn't help thinking "wish Freddy was here now"....
As for Queen, I first saw them on the "Crazy Tour" in 1979. Managed to get 6 dates on that tour in. Saw them another 5 times on the "Works" tour in 1982. Then I got some strange feeling about the "Magic" tour in 1986, quit work and followed them around Europe. People thought I was mad at the time, but it was pretty much the best thing I've ever done. |
Re: Concorde
Didn't ever fly on it. When my ex worked for BMI, we could get tickets for 400 quid each to NYC. Stupidly, we never took advantage of that! My first job at LHR was the security company that had the contract with BA though so I've been on it many times. First impressions, not the luxury I was expecting. 2 and 2 configuration, the seats were OK but not the luxury I thought they would be. You were paying for the speed, not the luxury. That said, it was no cattle class. The best part of the plane was the cockpit! Like an old world war 2 bomber. No glass cockpit there. If you counted every switch and dial, you'd end up in the thousands easily.
I was lucky enough to work 7 years in Air Ops at LHR. Concorde retired before I joined, but this still hangs proudly on the unit wall http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u...1/470f8e14.jpg The one Concorde BA still own, I want to say AC, but don't quote me that, is at least on display now, sort of. It's just to the east of the 27L hold, the southern runway. http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u...ps2b7f759f.jpg http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u...ps8c6defe9.jpg Oh, and I also had the privelage of seeing a shuttle launch at Cape Canavarel which I'm afraid blew any Concorde experiences I've had out of the water. |
Re: Concorde
She's Alpha Bravo, not Charlie, but she's in terrible shape now - not even protected from the elements.
Shame on you BA. |
Re: Concorde
I would say, cosmetically, the exterior isn't too bad considering. One of my colleagues used to take it on himself to go aboard and try and keep it clean in his spare time. Then bits started going missing, not from him I might add, so BA sealed it up and that was that.
I hoarded a load of copies of Skyport, heathrow's paper when she was taken out of service. They did a souviner special. I thought I'd sell me to all the spotters on eBay and make a killing. Unfortunately, every other one of Heathrow's 60,000 employees had the same idea LOL |
Re: Concorde
There's one at Ringway as well, isn't there? Or at least there used to be - I seem to remember seeing one on my way back from a trip out here, by the runway when we were coming in to land, or maybe when we were taxiing to the gate.
I might also be going mental, of course. |
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 10961883)
There's one at Ringway as well, isn't there? Or at least there used to be - I seem to remember seeing one on my way back from a trip out here, by the runway when we were coming in to land, or maybe when we were taxiing to the gate.
I might also be going mental, of course. |
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 10961890)
|
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 10961600)
Also it was quite novel arriving before you left as the time difference was five hours but the flight time was only three hours.
But then, that is a factor of the Dateline, not speed. |
Re: Concorde
I always did think it was kind of neat to spend a day and a half going to Bangkok, but only half a day coming back.
Regards, JEff
Originally Posted by S Folinsky
(Post 10961956)
Eastbound Trans Pacific flights arrive before leaving -- after flying through the night.
But then, that is a factor of the Dateline, not speed. |
Re: Concorde
Originally Posted by jeffreyhy
(Post 10961985)
I always did think it was kind of neat to spend a day and a half going to Bangkok, but only half a day coming back.
Regards, JEff [BTW, this was usually L.A.-Seoul]. [One trip to HoChihMin City via Taipei left LA at Midnight -- that was totally discombobulating]. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:44 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.