Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

"Child health care bill"

"Child health care bill"

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 30th 2009, 1:44 pm
  #1  
Unmitigated Gall
Thread Starter
 
another bloody yank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: it's still too dark to tell
Posts: 16,162
another bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond repute
Default "Child health care bill"

What does this mean? I didn't even know we had anything like this.


"The Democratic majority turned back Republican amendments to limit expansion of the program. Among the failed amendments were a prohibition on using federal money to cover children of newly arrived legal immigrants and a stricter income limit in some states for participating families.

Current law requires a five-year waiting period before legal immigrants become eligible for coverage under Medicaid and SCHIP. Democrats said that removing the ban would help children before small health problems became big ones.

"It is likely many of these children are already U.S. citizens and many will become U.S citizens, and their being unhealthy doesn't make sense for that family, and it certainly does not make sense for our nation." said Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090130/...en_s_health_19
another bloody yank is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 2:12 pm
  #2  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

There are more programs out there then most people realize, it can just be hard to find them...

My sisters kids are covered under a similar program in California, Healthy Families which I think the state receives some federal funding for.

http://www.healthyfamilies.ca.gov/HF....aspx#eligible
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 2:12 pm
  #3  
BE Forum Addict
 
The Horticulturalist's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,544
The Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by another bloody yank
What does this mean? I didn't even know we had anything like this.


"The Democratic majority turned back Republican amendments to limit expansion of the program. Among the failed amendments were a prohibition on using federal money to cover children of newly arrived legal immigrants and a stricter income limit in some states for participating families.

Current law requires a five-year waiting period before legal immigrants become eligible for coverage under Medicaid and SCHIP. Democrats said that removing the ban would help children before small health problems became big ones.

"It is likely many of these children are already U.S. citizens and many will become U.S citizens, and their being unhealthy doesn't make sense for that family, and it certainly does not make sense for our nation." said Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090130/...en_s_health_19
I just re-read that and realised that it said legal immigrants, not illegal.

Just what is the Republican problem with LEGAL immigrants having access to these programs, given that they are paying tax like every other working American?

Someone had mentioned the SCHIP program to us as our 6yr old has a pre-existing condition and at the time (when we were planning our move) we were not sure whether we could get insurance for him. If SCHIP had been the only option I don't think we would have come over.
The Horticulturalist is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 2:30 pm
  #4  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by The Horticulturalist
I just re-read that and realised that it said legal immigrants, not illegal.

Just what is the Republican problem with LEGAL immigrants having access to these programs, given that they are paying tax like every other working American?

Someone had mentioned the SCHIP program to us as our 6yr old has a pre-existing condition and at the time (when we were planning our move) we were not sure whether we could get insurance for him. If SCHIP had been the only option I don't think we would have come over.
Probably because if immigrants just get here they haven't paid much into the system yet.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 2:42 pm
  #5  
BE Forum Addict
 
hobbes79's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Andover, MA
Posts: 1,703
hobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by another bloody yank

Current law requires a five-year waiting period before legal immigrants become eligible for coverage under Medicaid and SCHIP

"It is likely many of these children are already U.S. citizens and many will become U.S citizens, and their being unhealthy doesn't make sense for that family, and it certainly does not make sense for our nation." said Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill."[/I]
Err, by definition, if you are a US Citizen you are NOT an immigrant.

You can't be a US citizen immigrant...
hobbes79 is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 2:44 pm
  #6  
BE Forum Addict
 
hobbes79's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Andover, MA
Posts: 1,703
hobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond reputehobbes79 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by Jsmth321
Probably because if immigrants just get here they haven't paid much into the system yet.
I hear that, but I assume that's why it makes sense to open up the rules for children, not adults.

How much Social Security has your average 6-month old born in the US paid into the system?

Probably about as much as a 6-month old Ukranian that's just moved here...
hobbes79 is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 3:54 pm
  #7  
@matthewb76
 
Manc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 21,886
Manc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond reputeManc has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by another bloody yank
What does this mean?
It means if you're unlucky enough to have a kid that needs dialysis every other day you don't go bankrupt trying to keep your child alive.


and republicans pretend to be pro-life.
Manc is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 4:26 pm
  #8  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by The Horticulturalist
I just re-read that and realised that it said legal immigrants, not illegal.

Just what is the Republican problem with LEGAL immigrants having access to these programs, given that they are paying tax like every other working American?
Legal immigrants are not entitled to means-tested benefits for their first 5 years in the US; most of the programs have a filter built into their system to prohibit them from applying. This includes thing like 'welfare', food stamps and medicare as well as Medicaid and SCHIP.

Children are a special problem because they often will be the USCs in the household. They are entitled to benefits by virtue of citizenship.
Ex, I know a family of 5 where the parents and oldest child (now 15) are here totally illegally, meaning they snook in, not overstayed. The other 2 children were born here, one of them with pretty severe retardation. He receives a number of benefits, probably SSDI and for sure food stamps and probably some medical. It's pretty common to have split citizenship families.

But back to legal immigrants; they too could have a child born in the US, making the child a citizen. When the immigrants naturalize after 5 years here, the children become citizens. Some kids who arrive as immigrants become citizens at entry depending on their family history.

I believe in this context 'immigrants' refers only to Permanent Residents.
meauxna is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 5:24 pm
  #9  
BE Forum Addict
 
The Horticulturalist's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,544
The Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond reputeThe Horticulturalist has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by meauxna
Legal immigrants are not entitled to means-tested benefits for their first 5 years in the US; most of the programs have a filter built into their system to prohibit them from applying. This includes thing like 'welfare', food stamps and medicare as well as Medicaid and SCHIP.

Children are a special problem because they often will be the USCs in the household. They are entitled to benefits by virtue of citizenship.
Ex, I know a family of 5 where the parents and oldest child (now 15) are here totally illegally, meaning they snook in, not overstayed. The other 2 children were born here, one of them with pretty severe retardation. He receives a number of benefits, probably SSDI and for sure food stamps and probably some medical. It's pretty common to have split citizenship families.

But back to legal immigrants; they too could have a child born in the US, making the child a citizen. When the immigrants naturalize after 5 years here, the children become citizens. Some kids who arrive as immigrants become citizens at entry depending on their family history.

I believe in this context 'immigrants' refers only to Permanent Residents.
Ah, ok. I overeacted to the bit that I read in the first posting, I apologise.

Similar rules apply for immigrants on visas in the UK. Most have 'No recourse to public funds' stamped in their passports and so couldn't claim benefits of any kind. They do have access to the NHS though.
The Horticulturalist is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 7:28 pm
  #10  
BE Forum Addict
 
Brit3964's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,068
Brit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

I think it's a good thing the restrictions are being rolled back. I have a UKC friend in OK and she has a UKC kid. Both are PRs. Her soon-to-be-USC ex has been a real b*&tard and is making sure she can't get anything through the courts even though he's been lying (to the courts) all along and owes her money.

She arrived in the USA in 2003, but thanks to many mistakes made by the USCIS, she didn't get PR status until 2007 (10yr card). She isn't eligible for Federal Government benefits until 2012.

OK is one of those tough anti-illegal immigrant States and in it's zeal to exclude illegals, it's also been causing problems for legals as well. As she is still married to him (the divorce has been going on for nearly 2yrs now), all this time she can't claim benefits in OK because they say the USC hubby is responsible for her. Of course, once she's divorced she can but by then, she'll be out on the street and homeless.

She had a chance to claim VAWA a few years ago. The hubby is a control freak. She now wishes she had done it.
Brit3964 is offline  
Old Jan 30th 2009, 7:41 pm
  #11  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Remind her about his I-864 Affidavit of Support.
Divorce does not discharge it, it promises to support her and repay any means-tested benefits she gets (if she can get them).
Sucks for her.
meauxna is offline  
Old Jan 31st 2009, 2:59 am
  #12  
BE Forum Addict
 
Brit3964's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,068
Brit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond reputeBrit3964 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: "Child health care bill"

Originally Posted by meauxna
Remind her about his I-864 Affidavit of Support.
Divorce does not discharge it, it promises to support her and repay any means-tested benefits she gets (if she can get them).
Sucks for her.
She knows about all that. The problem is he claims he's unemployed and therefore has no money. Kinda strange how he's able to travel to Canada and Mexico still running his online business with no money though. He's been milking the divorce court system for all it's worth. He's on his 4th lawyer now!
Brit3964 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.