Anti science legislation in Arizona
#61
Some Where in the Desert
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 247
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2552385.html
#62
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
With the republicans suddenly falling over themselves to embrace hispanics and immigrants in the aftermath of the last election, I wonder just how long good ol' Sheriff Joe can keep on about cracking down on the illegals ...?
Some day, Jindal or Rubio or Christie is going to call him up and tell him to get with the program ...
Some day, Jindal or Rubio or Christie is going to call him up and tell him to get with the program ...
#63
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,847
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
With the republicans suddenly falling over themselves to embrace hispanics and immigrants in the aftermath of the last election, I wonder just how long good ol' Sheriff Joe can keep on about cracking down on the illegals ...?
Some day, Jindal or Rubio or Christie is going to call him up and tell him to get with the program ...
Some day, Jindal or Rubio or Christie is going to call him up and tell him to get with the program ...
#66
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
What's the dude on the cliff doing? Is he about to throw himself off from sheer despair at the stupidity?
How can this possibly pass muster as a textbook? I mean, why is it even allowed to bring up children with this level of ignorance? It's like the middle ages, it really is.
How can this possibly pass muster as a textbook? I mean, why is it even allowed to bring up children with this level of ignorance? It's like the middle ages, it really is.
#67
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
sun going around the earth
flat earth
banning gallileo for publishing jupiters moons
doesn't matter what you believe or how you try to indoctrinate, Science will win because it's fact and the evidence supports it.
How many times throughout history has judeo-christian religious teachings been proven factually correct over scientific learning? zero.
Thanks Darwin, Copernicus, Megellen, Gallileo, Dalton, Newton, et al, Religion has always in the end had to change to fit the scientific mould as people realised what the church taught was complete nonsense.
flat earth
banning gallileo for publishing jupiters moons
doesn't matter what you believe or how you try to indoctrinate, Science will win because it's fact and the evidence supports it.
How many times throughout history has judeo-christian religious teachings been proven factually correct over scientific learning? zero.
Thanks Darwin, Copernicus, Megellen, Gallileo, Dalton, Newton, et al, Religion has always in the end had to change to fit the scientific mould as people realised what the church taught was complete nonsense.
#68
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
Oh good lord, save me from my fellow christians....
Where to start? Saying someone "believes" something has no place whatsoever in a science text book. You do not "believe" facts. Facts are objective and verifiable.
Organisms do not evolve (like a shape-shifter in a sci-fi story), but species do. No mention of the mechanism (natural selection), which is an observable, verifiable phenomena.
And the whole paragraph about the Flood and why animals are at the top of the fossil layers is completely laughable. I can't read it without going into a Sheldon-esque rant. Anyone with a science degree who seriously teaches that should have their degree withdrawn.
One simple question though, which I've never seen answered - where did all this water come from and where did it go? If there was a Great Flood which covered the whole planet killed all living things, that's rather a lot of water. Where did it go when it subsided (bearing in mind it covered the whole planet)? Did God just pull the plug?
Where to start? Saying someone "believes" something has no place whatsoever in a science text book. You do not "believe" facts. Facts are objective and verifiable.
Organisms do not evolve (like a shape-shifter in a sci-fi story), but species do. No mention of the mechanism (natural selection), which is an observable, verifiable phenomena.
And the whole paragraph about the Flood and why animals are at the top of the fossil layers is completely laughable. I can't read it without going into a Sheldon-esque rant. Anyone with a science degree who seriously teaches that should have their degree withdrawn.
One simple question though, which I've never seen answered - where did all this water come from and where did it go? If there was a Great Flood which covered the whole planet killed all living things, that's rather a lot of water. Where did it go when it subsided (bearing in mind it covered the whole planet)? Did God just pull the plug?
#69
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
sun going around the earth
flat earth
banning gallileo for publishing jupiters moons
doesn't matter what you believe or how you try to indoctrinate, Science will win because it's fact and the evidence supports it.
How many times throughout history has judeo-christian religious teachings been proven factually correct over scientific learning? zero.
Thanks Darwin, Copernicus, Megellen, Gallileo, Dalton, Newton, et al, Religion has always in the end had to change to fit the scientific mould as people realised what the church taught was complete nonsense.
flat earth
banning gallileo for publishing jupiters moons
doesn't matter what you believe or how you try to indoctrinate, Science will win because it's fact and the evidence supports it.
How many times throughout history has judeo-christian religious teachings been proven factually correct over scientific learning? zero.
Thanks Darwin, Copernicus, Megellen, Gallileo, Dalton, Newton, et al, Religion has always in the end had to change to fit the scientific mould as people realised what the church taught was complete nonsense.
Away from the mumbo-jumbo, the church has contributed plenty to scientific learning.
#70
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
Copernicus was a catholic clergyman, Galileo was a fellow of the church-sponsored Accademia dei Lincei and Newton firmly believed God was at the centre of the Universe. Additionally, the Big Bang theory of early development of the universe was first put forward by a catholic priest - Georges LeMaitre.
Away from the mumbo-jumbo, the church has contributed plenty to scientific learning.
Away from the mumbo-jumbo, the church has contributed plenty to scientific learning.
#71
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
One simple question though, which I've never seen answered - where did all this water come from and where did it go? If there was a Great Flood which covered the whole planet killed all living things, that's rather a lot of water. Where did it go when it subsided (bearing in mind it covered the whole planet)? Did God just pull the plug?
Checking the internets, it might have been the Black sea, the Med' was earlier.
Last edited by sir_eccles; Jan 30th 2013 at 3:39 pm.
#72
Re: Anti science legislation in Arizona
Copernicus was a catholic clergyman, Galileo was a fellow of the church-sponsored Accademia dei Lincei and Newton firmly believed God was at the centre of the Universe. Additionally, the Big Bang theory of early development of the universe was first put forward by a catholic priest - Georges LeMaitre.
Away from the mumbo-jumbo, the church has contributed plenty to scientific learning.
Away from the mumbo-jumbo, the church has contributed plenty to scientific learning.
He whom owns the libraries and books and research grants, controls whom learns.
However, your point wasn't a viable answer to my point.
When has a religious doctrine or belief structure overturned a scientific thought or theory based on evidence.
never......
Last edited by Manc; Jan 30th 2013 at 3:43 pm.