Work Authorized or not?
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Work Authorized or not?
"Folinskyinla" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Originally posted by Justin Gladding
> > My (now) wife is here finally. We were married on May 28th, and
> > last week we
> > went and applied for her social security card. The girl in the
> > SSA office
> > wanted to give us the "NOT VALID FOR WORK" card until I showed her
> > a letter
> > that I had reprinted from the K1 exit.com site stating that the K1
> > in itself
> > was authorization from the INS for her to work. Low and behold,
> > what showed
> > up in the mail yesterday? Her SS Card, without the INS approval
> > conditions.
> > Does this mean that she can work simply by showing her Visa and SS
> > Card?
> Hi:
> The law is confusing on this one. Your wife is AUTHOIRZED to work
> "indicent to status." However, the only acceptable "evidence" for this
> is the EAD. However, an employer will be breaking the law if they
> insist on requirig the EAD. They must honor an unrestricted SSN card
> and picture ID as evidence of permission to work.
> Got it?
> Now, if your wife works day 91 after entry without an EAD in hand she
> WILL be in violation of the law. And if she told the employer the truth
> on the I-9, it asks for an expiration date of employment authorization
> [you already know that form the I-9's, you as a citizen have filled out
> from time to time], the employer will have to let her go.
> Makes perfect sense, right?
I think its ridiculous!! LOL. Nothing about this process seems to make sense
to me at all! I think it would just be better if they do away with the airy
fairy "technically being able to work for the 90 days on a k-1 visa" because
unless you apply for you EAD from day one and its doubtful even then, you're
DEFINITELY going to be out of status before you get your EAD - processing
times for EAD's being what they are. Either that or issue the temp EAD at
POE. *trying to remain cheerful and positive despite a hell-inspired
process*
Tracey
news:[email protected]...
> Originally posted by Justin Gladding
> > My (now) wife is here finally. We were married on May 28th, and
> > last week we
> > went and applied for her social security card. The girl in the
> > SSA office
> > wanted to give us the "NOT VALID FOR WORK" card until I showed her
> > a letter
> > that I had reprinted from the K1 exit.com site stating that the K1
> > in itself
> > was authorization from the INS for her to work. Low and behold,
> > what showed
> > up in the mail yesterday? Her SS Card, without the INS approval
> > conditions.
> > Does this mean that she can work simply by showing her Visa and SS
> > Card?
> Hi:
> The law is confusing on this one. Your wife is AUTHOIRZED to work
> "indicent to status." However, the only acceptable "evidence" for this
> is the EAD. However, an employer will be breaking the law if they
> insist on requirig the EAD. They must honor an unrestricted SSN card
> and picture ID as evidence of permission to work.
> Got it?
> Now, if your wife works day 91 after entry without an EAD in hand she
> WILL be in violation of the law. And if she told the employer the truth
> on the I-9, it asks for an expiration date of employment authorization
> [you already know that form the I-9's, you as a citizen have filled out
> from time to time], the employer will have to let her go.
> Makes perfect sense, right?
I think its ridiculous!! LOL. Nothing about this process seems to make sense
to me at all! I think it would just be better if they do away with the airy
fairy "technically being able to work for the 90 days on a k-1 visa" because
unless you apply for you EAD from day one and its doubtful even then, you're
DEFINITELY going to be out of status before you get your EAD - processing
times for EAD's being what they are. Either that or issue the temp EAD at
POE. *trying to remain cheerful and positive despite a hell-inspired
process*
Tracey