Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > US Immigration, Citizenship and Visas
Reload this Page >

Visas - what rules would you change?

Visas - what rules would you change?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 13th 2013, 1:39 pm
  #151  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 656
slummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to all
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

Very nice of you to apologise...

So, we still don't know where this moral turpitude really comes from although I'm trying to say it might come from 1795 (see one of my posts above).

Does anyone know?
slummymummy is offline  
Old Mar 13th 2013, 1:52 pm
  #152  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 707
DavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond reputeDavidLemon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

Originally Posted by slummymummy
So, we still don't know where this moral turpitude really comes from although I'm trying to say it might come from 1795 (see one of my posts above).

Does anyone know?


Whilst i do not know the authenticity of its statements, this link produces a good read and possible insight to the existence of Moral Turpitude. According to this article, we might believe that the definition was from the 1800s and was introduced by the British Empire.

http://ezinearticles.com/?A-History-...rld&id=5838688
DavidLemon is offline  
Old Mar 13th 2013, 1:59 pm
  #153  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 656
slummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to all
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

I read it, thanks. Other countries have changed but not the US...

Last edited by slummymummy; Mar 13th 2013 at 2:01 pm.
slummymummy is offline  
Old Mar 13th 2013, 3:58 pm
  #154  
Are we there yet?
 
Trixie_b's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: 31 miles from Cool (California)
Posts: 2,467
Trixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

Originally Posted by materialcontroller
What "sort" would that be exactly?

Are you so narrow minded to believe that somebody is a threat to society and has to be curtailed because they've got a couple of ancient convictions for shoplifting or smoking a spliff?
Originally Posted by slummymummy
Interesting debate! And I do agree with the post above. But Trixie did say that it needs an "overhaul" so don't be too hard on her.
Originally Posted by materialcontroller
OK, you are right.

Trixie, I apologise for the tone of the earlier post. It's just unnecessary to continue to define people by their actions decades ago, which is effectively what moral turpitude does.
And that's exactly what I said in my post. and note the "that sort" was in quotes. A country has the right to allow or disallow anyone from stepping over their borders. The CIMT rules are currently unclear and unnecessarily difficult.

But just like the UK stopping the Westborou' Baptist church members from entering into the UK, the USA should keep similar "black balling" techniques.
Trixie_b is offline  
Old Mar 14th 2013, 9:30 pm
  #155  
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Steve_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 8,928
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

On the crime thing, I would remove any mention of the words "arrested" from the regulations and CBP should not ask the question at the POE either. Question B on I-94W for example asks that question.

Standards of arrest vary massively from country to country and it puts a negative connotation on your entry, even though it could have been an arrest that wouldn't be remotely possible in the US, e.g. due to a political protest.

In many countries they don't read you your rights or anything like that, they just haul you in, so you're not even sure if you have been arrested or not.
Steve_ is offline  
Old Mar 14th 2013, 10:47 pm
  #156  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 656
slummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to allslummymummy is a name known to all
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

Yes totally agree and someone else already mentioned it. Someone can be arrested for something they are innocent of.

A friend of mine was once arrested for no reason (in London) but he's not sure if he was actually arrested or just put in the drunk tank (even though he wasn't even drunk). Was let out in the middle of the night with no explanation. His police record was clear so chose not to declare it. Still stressful though as he was worried that THEY would find out...

Also, I don't think children who were "forced" by their parents to overstay their VWP should have to suffer for that. (They can't use VWP again.) We had a thread about that recently - the music producer guy.
slummymummy is offline  
Old Mar 19th 2013, 7:39 pm
  #157  
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Steve_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 8,928
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Visas - what rules would you change?

Actually thinking about it, wouldn't it be simpler if all the nice parts of the US were annexed by Canada?
Steve_ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.