Oppose Further Immigration Into U.S.
Nov 25th 2001, 1:45 am
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Susan Cohen <[email protected]>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
Susan, you are one of those people when you are wrong or can't come up with a answer,
start calling everybody a bigot. It's so much easier that way. I would say YOU are
the bigot. People like you are sickening.
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
Susan, you are one of those people when you are wrong or can't come up with a answer,
start calling everybody a bigot. It's so much easier that way. I would say YOU are
the bigot. People like you are sickening.
Nov 25th 2001, 3:28 am
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
take action wrote:
>
[usenetquote2]> > Jade Duboir wrote:[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > into the country.[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > So, make yourself happy, & leave.[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > Susan[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
Not only is this wrong, *you* are one of those people who can't tell when someone is
a troublemaker. Check the rest of "Jade's" posts.
>
It's certainly easy for you to sit there & misrespresent my posts.
>
Youseem to say a lot of stupid things. In this post alone.
>
I hope I continue to make people like you*very* sick.
>
[usenetquote2]> > Jade Duboir wrote:[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > into the country.[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > So, make yourself happy, & leave.[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > Susan[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
Not only is this wrong, *you* are one of those people who can't tell when someone is
a troublemaker. Check the rest of "Jade's" posts.
>
It's certainly easy for you to sit there & misrespresent my posts.
>
Youseem to say a lot of stupid things. In this post alone.
>
I hope I continue to make people like you*very* sick.
Nov 25th 2001, 4:07 am
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Susan Cohen <[email protected]>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
Maybe you should report his illegal porn smuggling ring to the INS and customs?
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
Maybe you should report his illegal porn smuggling ring to the INS and customs?
Nov 25th 2001, 9:44 pm
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
I also agree that we should not allow in anybody who doesn't want to come here.
However, as someone who was Palestinian-born, I dream about Palestine becoming the
51st State. For a nominal price ($10billion say), the US can acquire a valuable
piece of property right in the center of the planet [although the US government will
not have jurisdiction over the Holy Sepulcher where the church of the center of the
world lies]
The money goes to rehabilitate the refugees who have suffered at the hands of
Israel, and once part of the union, the palestinians can carry their claims through
the US courts.
============================================
Fascinating Article on Palestinian Genetics, Science and Politics
The following article on Palestinian and Jewish genetic similarity, and the clash
between science and politics in an important journal article, appears in today's
edition of the British newspaper The Observer. It can be read online at
<http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,605798,00.html>.
Journal axes gene research on Jews and Palestinians Robin McKie, science editor
Sunday November 25 2001 The Observer
A keynote research paper showing that Middle Eastern Jews and Palestinians are
genetically almost identical has been pulled from a leading journal. Academics who
have already received copies of Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the
offending pages and throw them away.
Such a drastic act of self-censorship is unprecedented in research publishing and has
created widespread disquiet, generating fears that it may involve the suppression of
scientific work that questions Biblical dogma.
'I have authored several hundred scientific papers, some for Nature and Science, and
this has never happened to me before,' said the article's lead author, Spanish
geneticist Professor Antonio Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. 'I
am stunned.'
British geneticist Sir Walter Bodmer added: 'If the journal didn't like the paper,
they shouldn't have published it in the first place. Why wait until it has appeared
before acting like this?'
The journal's editor, Nicole Sucio-Foca, of Columbia University, New York, claims the
article provoked such a welter of complaints over its extreme political writing that
she was forced to repudiate it. The article has been removed from Human Immunology's
website, while letters have been written to libraries and universities throughout the
world asking them to ignore or 'preferably to physically remove the relevant pages'.
Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal's editorial board.
Dolly Tyan, president of the American Society of Histocompatibility and
Immunogenetics, which runs the journal, told subscribers that the society is
'offended and embarrassed'.
The paper, 'The Origin of Palestinians and their Genetic Relatedness with other
Mediterranean Populations', involved studying genetic variations in immune system
genes among people in the Middle East.
In common with earlier studies, the team found no data to support the idea that
Jewish people were genetically distinct from other people in the region. In doing so,
the team's research challenges claims that Jews are a special, chosen people and that
Judaism can only be inherited.
Jews and Palestinians in the Middle East share a very similar gene pool and must be
considered closely related and not genetically separate, the authors state. Rivalry
between the two races is therefore based 'in cultural and religious, but not in
genetic differences', they conclude.
But the journal, having accepted the paper earlier this year, now claims the article
was politically biased and was written using 'inappropriate' remarks about the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its editor told the journal Nature last week that she
was threatened by mass resignations from members if she did not retract the article.
Arnaiz-Villena says he has not seen a single one of the accusations made against him,
despite being promised the opportunity to look at the letters sent to the journal.
He accepts he used terms in the article that laid him open to criticism. There is one
reference to Jewish 'colonists' living in the Gaza strip, and another that refers to
Palestinian people living in 'concentration' camps.
'Perhaps I should have used the words settlers instead of colonists, but really, what
is the difference?' he said.
'And clearly, I should have said refugee, not concentration, camps, but given that I
was referring to settlements outside of Israel - in Syria and Lebanon - that scarcely
makes me anti-Jewish. References to the history of the region, the ones that are
supposed to be politically offensive, were taken from the Encyclopaedia Britannica,
and other text books.'
In the wake of the journal's actions, and claims of mass protests about the article,
several scientists have now written to the society to support Arnaiz-Villena and to
protest about their heavy-handedness.
One of them said: 'If Arnaiz-Villena had found evidence that Jewish people were
genetically very special, instead of ordinary, you can be sure no one would have
objected to the phrases he used in his article. This is a very sad business.'
================================================== ======
>
[usenetquote2]> >I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
However, as someone who was Palestinian-born, I dream about Palestine becoming the
51st State. For a nominal price ($10billion say), the US can acquire a valuable
piece of property right in the center of the planet [although the US government will
not have jurisdiction over the Holy Sepulcher where the church of the center of the
world lies]
The money goes to rehabilitate the refugees who have suffered at the hands of
Israel, and once part of the union, the palestinians can carry their claims through
the US courts.
============================================
Fascinating Article on Palestinian Genetics, Science and Politics
The following article on Palestinian and Jewish genetic similarity, and the clash
between science and politics in an important journal article, appears in today's
edition of the British newspaper The Observer. It can be read online at
<http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,605798,00.html>.
Journal axes gene research on Jews and Palestinians Robin McKie, science editor
Sunday November 25 2001 The Observer
A keynote research paper showing that Middle Eastern Jews and Palestinians are
genetically almost identical has been pulled from a leading journal. Academics who
have already received copies of Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the
offending pages and throw them away.
Such a drastic act of self-censorship is unprecedented in research publishing and has
created widespread disquiet, generating fears that it may involve the suppression of
scientific work that questions Biblical dogma.
'I have authored several hundred scientific papers, some for Nature and Science, and
this has never happened to me before,' said the article's lead author, Spanish
geneticist Professor Antonio Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. 'I
am stunned.'
British geneticist Sir Walter Bodmer added: 'If the journal didn't like the paper,
they shouldn't have published it in the first place. Why wait until it has appeared
before acting like this?'
The journal's editor, Nicole Sucio-Foca, of Columbia University, New York, claims the
article provoked such a welter of complaints over its extreme political writing that
she was forced to repudiate it. The article has been removed from Human Immunology's
website, while letters have been written to libraries and universities throughout the
world asking them to ignore or 'preferably to physically remove the relevant pages'.
Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal's editorial board.
Dolly Tyan, president of the American Society of Histocompatibility and
Immunogenetics, which runs the journal, told subscribers that the society is
'offended and embarrassed'.
The paper, 'The Origin of Palestinians and their Genetic Relatedness with other
Mediterranean Populations', involved studying genetic variations in immune system
genes among people in the Middle East.
In common with earlier studies, the team found no data to support the idea that
Jewish people were genetically distinct from other people in the region. In doing so,
the team's research challenges claims that Jews are a special, chosen people and that
Judaism can only be inherited.
Jews and Palestinians in the Middle East share a very similar gene pool and must be
considered closely related and not genetically separate, the authors state. Rivalry
between the two races is therefore based 'in cultural and religious, but not in
genetic differences', they conclude.
But the journal, having accepted the paper earlier this year, now claims the article
was politically biased and was written using 'inappropriate' remarks about the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its editor told the journal Nature last week that she
was threatened by mass resignations from members if she did not retract the article.
Arnaiz-Villena says he has not seen a single one of the accusations made against him,
despite being promised the opportunity to look at the letters sent to the journal.
He accepts he used terms in the article that laid him open to criticism. There is one
reference to Jewish 'colonists' living in the Gaza strip, and another that refers to
Palestinian people living in 'concentration' camps.
'Perhaps I should have used the words settlers instead of colonists, but really, what
is the difference?' he said.
'And clearly, I should have said refugee, not concentration, camps, but given that I
was referring to settlements outside of Israel - in Syria and Lebanon - that scarcely
makes me anti-Jewish. References to the history of the region, the ones that are
supposed to be politically offensive, were taken from the Encyclopaedia Britannica,
and other text books.'
In the wake of the journal's actions, and claims of mass protests about the article,
several scientists have now written to the society to support Arnaiz-Villena and to
protest about their heavy-handedness.
One of them said: 'If Arnaiz-Villena had found evidence that Jewish people were
genetically very special, instead of ordinary, you can be sure no one would have
objected to the phrases he used in his article. This is a very sad business.'
================================================== ======
>
[usenetquote2]> >I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
Nov 26th 2001, 5:17 am
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yehudim Abdallah wrote:
>
>
How is their leaving the land so that the Israelis could be murdered by their
neighbors "suffering"? Well, I suppose it is, but the hands are not Israel's.
>
>
Where the facts would finally come to light & they will be laughed out of court.
Rather like when Sharon took Time to court - he won, but the anti-Israeli propaganda
machines steamrolled right over the Truth, as usual.
>
>
How is their leaving the land so that the Israelis could be murdered by their
neighbors "suffering"? Well, I suppose it is, but the hands are not Israel's.
>
>
Where the facts would finally come to light & they will be laughed out of court.
Rather like when Sharon took Time to court - he won, but the anti-Israeli propaganda
machines steamrolled right over the Truth, as usual.
Nov 26th 2001, 10:41 am
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
What about reparations for the people who were forced to come here?
Nov 26th 2001, 7:08 pm
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jade Duboir wrote:
>
We can't afford it. Any reparations would be a pittance compared to what should have
been paid, *&* would let bigots think they can then get off the hook with being
legally forced to deal equally with those they insist are inferior.
(Yes, I'm answering the troll as if it were serious. But I felt like it)
Susan
>
We can't afford it. Any reparations would be a pittance compared to what should have
been paid, *&* would let bigots think they can then get off the hook with being
legally forced to deal equally with those they insist are inferior.
(Yes, I'm answering the troll as if it were serious. But I felt like it)
Susan
Nov 26th 2001, 7:51 pm
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Susan Cohen <[email protected]>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
If Jade Duboir is an Indian name, then I am a native Indian.
Murthy Gandikota
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > I am Indian from India and believe we should not allow any more of my people into[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > the country.[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
>
If Jade Duboir is an Indian name, then I am a native Indian.
Murthy Gandikota
Nov 26th 2001, 10:12 pm
#101
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am plotting a plan to get rid of all white evil in America. I really love black and
spanish people. They are cool.
spanish people. They are cool.
Nov 26th 2001, 10:13 pm
#102
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ever heard of slavery?
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > What about reparations for the people who were forced to come here?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > What about reparations for the people who were forced to come here?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
>
Nov 26th 2001, 10:13 pm
#103
Guest
Posts: n/a
Since when does the legal system ever care if the defendant can afford something?
Reparations is the right thing.
Reparations is the right thing.
Nov 26th 2001, 10:13 pm
#104
Guest
Posts: n/a
you must be really old. Wow so tell me of your life and how things have changed since
the old days...........
>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > were you forced? and if yes how?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > What about reparations for the people who were forced to come here?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
the old days...........
>
>
>
[usenetquote2]> > were you forced? and if yes how?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > > What about reparations for the people who were forced to come here?[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> > >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
[usenetquote2]> >[/usenetquote2]
Nov 26th 2001, 10:15 pm
#105
Guest
Posts: n/a
Better check the "Spanish and the Slave trade" remember the Armistade.......... owned
by SPAIN and the Cargo fought over by the then QUEEN OF SPAIN!! Rent the film you
might learn something.
>
love
>
by SPAIN and the Cargo fought over by the then QUEEN OF SPAIN!! Rent the film you
might learn something.
>
love
>