GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
#16
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
JFK
#18
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Thank you guys!
#19
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Newark is a shithole.
#21
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Well for starters it's not even in the same state as New York City but its also something of a trek to get there - the most effective route is the train into Penn station but that isn't easy when carrying any luggage.
#22
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
I'd rather fly into Newark than JFK.
In my opinion, it is easier to get from Newark to Manhattan than JFK to Manhattan. Also there are more connecting flights from Newark than JFK.
In my opinion, it is easier to get from Newark to Manhattan than JFK to Manhattan. Also there are more connecting flights from Newark than JFK.
Last edited by Michael; Feb 2nd 2014 at 2:51 am.
#23
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
There's a direct express train into NYC. Way easier than JFK.
#24
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,158
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Herein lies the answer: it really depends on your final destination. I was always heading to Brooklyn, so LGA and JFK were the obvious choices.
#25
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
I'd join in recommending EWR over JFK as an airport.
On the legal front, legal consultation is highly recommended. Please note that most immigration lawyers are not all that conversant in "abandonment" law. In your consultation [which I would recommend avoiding "free" ones], you may want to inquire if the lawyer has tried at least one abandoment case.
The two "mother" cases are Matter of Kane and Matter of Huang.
When I was in practice, I would read these cases over whenever I had an abandoment case and every time I had a "how did I miss that" reaction.
Note that these cases tend to be quite fact specific. You indicate facts that might very well be helpful.
Note that I am semi-retired and do not take cases.
Good luck.
On the legal front, legal consultation is highly recommended. Please note that most immigration lawyers are not all that conversant in "abandonment" law. In your consultation [which I would recommend avoiding "free" ones], you may want to inquire if the lawyer has tried at least one abandoment case.
The two "mother" cases are Matter of Kane and Matter of Huang.
When I was in practice, I would read these cases over whenever I had an abandoment case and every time I had a "how did I miss that" reaction.
Note that these cases tend to be quite fact specific. You indicate facts that might very well be helpful.
Note that I am semi-retired and do not take cases.
Good luck.
#26
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Semi?
So what do you do?
I know Walmart have cut their greeters.
So what do you do?
I know Walmart have cut their greeters.
#27
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
I'd join in recommending EWR over JFK as an airport.
On the legal front, legal consultation is highly recommended. Please note that most immigration lawyers are not all that conversant in "abandonment" law. In your consultation [which I would recommend avoiding "free" ones], you may want to inquire if the lawyer has tried at least one abandoment case.
The two "mother" cases are Matter of Kane and Matter of Huang.
When I was in practice, I would read these cases over whenever I had an abandoment case and every time I had a "how did I miss that" reaction.
Note that these cases tend to be quite fact specific. You indicate facts that might very well be helpful.
Note that I am semi-retired and do not take cases.
Good luck.
On the legal front, legal consultation is highly recommended. Please note that most immigration lawyers are not all that conversant in "abandonment" law. In your consultation [which I would recommend avoiding "free" ones], you may want to inquire if the lawyer has tried at least one abandoment case.
The two "mother" cases are Matter of Kane and Matter of Huang.
When I was in practice, I would read these cases over whenever I had an abandoment case and every time I had a "how did I miss that" reaction.
Note that these cases tend to be quite fact specific. You indicate facts that might very well be helpful.
Note that I am semi-retired and do not take cases.
Good luck.
Would you happen to know about Dublin's pre clearance rules? From what I read, if a permanent resident arrives in the US and the immigration officer wants to revoke their green card, the permanent resident can still ask to appear in front an immigration judge. but what about Dublin? If you get denied, do you also have that possibility?
#28
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
... I should fill out a re entry permit that she would send on my arrival in the US.
From what I read, if a permanent resident arrives in the US and the immigration officer wants to revoke their green card...
... can still ask to appear in front an immigration judge.
If you get denied, do you also have that possibility?
Ian
#29
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
Actually I dont think she is, not on that point anyway. I really do not qualify for a returning resident visa. To qualify, I should prove that my protracted stay abroad was caused by reasons beyond your control and for which you were not responsible. (leaving the usa cause i needed a short break and then decided to go study abroad is definitely not something "beyond my control"
What she meant (and I still need to ask her questions about that) is that i'll fill it out and it will just show (if im being asked) the POE officer that I will never again leave the usa without notifying the department of immigration. hopefully thats she meant lol
"The officer does not have the authority to revoke your green card. I'm pretty sure I already explained that to you."
I did understand that but even though he cannot revoke it, from what I understood, he's the one who gets to decide if im denied entry, or if i need to further explain my situation to a supervisor, so he still have pretty much a lot of power should I have to experience a bad immigration process.
"You wouldn't be asking permission... you have the right to appear before an IJ. The officer can't deny you that right! The officer might think he can... but he can't. He might think he can force you to relinquish your green card... but he can't. He might push you to sign form I-407 (as always... Google is your friend)... but you are not obligated to sign it and, indeed, should not sign it no matter how much you might feel pressured into doing so."
That's definitely something I need to be prepared for. Immigration processes freak me out, no matter the country and even though I am an honest person and have nothing to hide. and american immigration officers are pretty much very intimidating (thats their job) so I have to get ready to be strong.
Thank you for your message
What she meant (and I still need to ask her questions about that) is that i'll fill it out and it will just show (if im being asked) the POE officer that I will never again leave the usa without notifying the department of immigration. hopefully thats she meant lol
"The officer does not have the authority to revoke your green card. I'm pretty sure I already explained that to you."
I did understand that but even though he cannot revoke it, from what I understood, he's the one who gets to decide if im denied entry, or if i need to further explain my situation to a supervisor, so he still have pretty much a lot of power should I have to experience a bad immigration process.
"You wouldn't be asking permission... you have the right to appear before an IJ. The officer can't deny you that right! The officer might think he can... but he can't. He might think he can force you to relinquish your green card... but he can't. He might push you to sign form I-407 (as always... Google is your friend)... but you are not obligated to sign it and, indeed, should not sign it no matter how much you might feel pressured into doing so."
That's definitely something I need to be prepared for. Immigration processes freak me out, no matter the country and even though I am an honest person and have nothing to hide. and american immigration officers are pretty much very intimidating (thats their job) so I have to get ready to be strong.
Thank you for your message
Last edited by cinoz; Feb 3rd 2014 at 12:45 pm.
#30
Banned
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,154
Re: GC holder (hasn't been in the US for 2 years) Flying via Dublin?
"The officer does not have the authority to revoke your green card. I'm pretty sure I already explained that to you."
I did understand that but even though he cannot revoke it, from what I understood, he's the one who gets to decide if im denied entry, or if i need to further explain my situation to a supervisor, so he still have pretty much a lot of power should I have to experience a bad immigration process.
I did understand that but even though he cannot revoke it, from what I understood, he's the one who gets to decide if im denied entry, or if i need to further explain my situation to a supervisor, so he still have pretty much a lot of power should I have to experience a bad immigration process.
What she meant (and I still need to ask her questions about that) is that i'll fill it out and it will just show (if im being asked) the POE officer that I will never again leave the usa without notifying the department of immigration. hopefully thats she meant