Entering under an R1 Visa

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 12th 2010, 1:30 am
  #16  
L2, GC, Surrey, OH, TX!
 
MsElui's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Surrey to Dallas (via Ohio)!
Posts: 6,363
MsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond reputeMsElui has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Entering under an R1 Visa

the younger kids dont have to attend visa interviews (think it was 13 or 15 that they HAVE to go) - mine didnt attend for the L visa we were after.
MsElui is offline  
Old Aug 12th 2010, 1:48 am
  #17  
US immigration lawyer.
 
JCraigFong's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles & Palm Springs, California
Posts: 695
JCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Entering under an R1 Visa

Originally Posted by ukhack
It's likely that I'm about to be offered a job with a large religious organisation in the US. The role is IT Manager for a large church and community centre.

I believe I would be eligible to enter the US under an R1 visa, Religious Workers visa. Question is, does this sound plausible for the role I would be taking? The church is a well known organisation in the US, and I'm not sure if the R-class visa covers any and all employees of religious organisations. Presumably my wife and son would enter under an R2 visa.
Andy, my office -- actually my law partner -- handles routine and exotic R visas all the time. We are immigration law counsel to some of the largest, best known denominations in the USA. Frankly, we've more often earned our stripes with the lesser known, more marginal denominations and sects, because they are less known and are subject to greater scrutiny by immigration authorities.

At all events, an IT manager does NOT strike me as qualified for R-1 under these circumstances. If you've got the university degree behind you -- at least a bachelor's degree -- the H-1 should work nicely for you, provided the organization can demonstrate its ability to pay a fair wage.

The fact that you have been a member of the denomination for years does not cut any ice with the authorities, nor does the fact that the work you're doing is being done for a religious organization. There HAVE been situations where non-ministerial workers have gotten R-1s, but the work must be extremely specific; at all events, USCIS has been clamping down on these situations lately, and without more facts, I would not encourage you to have much faith in the R-1 angle.

You or the church should contact an immigration attorney who knows what he or she is doing with respect to R visas. With USCIS conducting audits on all R visa petitioners, the organization must be prepared for the USCIS breathing down their necks.

I'd explore the H-1 avenue, too. That's likely to be more fruitful for you.

Best of luck.

--J Craig Fong
Los Angeles, CA
JCraigFong is offline  
Old Aug 12th 2010, 2:35 am
  #18  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,427
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Entering under an R1 Visa

Originally Posted by JCraigFong
We are immigration law counsel to some of the largest, best known denominations in the USA. Frankly, we've more often earned our stripes with the lesser known, more marginal denominations and sects, because they are less known and are subject to greater scrutiny by immigration authorities.
Hey J:

Don't you think you should be clearer on what is and what is not a marginal denomination or sect? Remember this case?
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Aug 12th 2010, 5:39 am
  #19  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,913
md95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond reputemd95065 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Entering under an R1 Visa

Originally Posted by Boiler
It does not matter what OP thinks or anybody here thinks would be the right visa.

It only matters what the Employer/Lawyer thinks.
Actually that doesn't matter either - it's what the US government thinks that really matters ...
md95065 is offline  
Old Aug 13th 2010, 9:12 pm
  #20  
US immigration lawyer.
 
JCraigFong's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles & Palm Springs, California
Posts: 695
JCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond reputeJCraigFong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Entering under an R1 Visa

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
Hey J:

Don't you think you should be clearer on what is and what is not a marginal denomination or sect? Remember this case?
No, Stuart, I do not think expounding is worth my time. On B.E., I leave the hard work of parsing cases and reviewing statutes and regulations to others. I certainly remember the case, and you know that we are very experienced with a number of denominations, churches, and temples. However, in the end, I leave that sort of thing for a consultation.
JCraigFong is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.