Can mother with U.S. citizen child get legal residency or citizenship?
#91
Forum Regular
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
![](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/ranks/star.gif)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 66
![mune is an unknown quantity at this point](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif)
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by Oliver Costich
Please indicate where I have behaved as you describe. My response have
been directly to a previous post. I'm sorry that you feel that
Please indicate where I have behaved as you describe. My response have
been directly to a previous post. I'm sorry that you feel that
Whatever issues you have about taxes, immigrants being a burden and all that is a different topic and we might know more about it than you think. It might be a better venue for you to raise these issues with your government representatives. I am all for US revising its imigration rules.
I just don't think it's very nice of you (again you as in some members of this forum) to post answers that are directed to hurt people. As you were so eager to defend Graphic Queen it showed me that you agree with her approach. Otherwice, you would have suggested her to change her way of talking to people here.
Originally posted by Oliver Costich
What's insulting is whining about the
processes of legal immigration, or worse, about lack of rights for
illegals.
What's insulting is whining about the
processes of legal immigration, or worse, about lack of rights for
illegals.
Take it easy.
![mune is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
lairdside wrote:
> IMHO it would give your argument far more validity as a
> tangible approach. Not all immigrants are hopeless, parasitic losers who
> came here for a "free ride".
>
> I for one would put my life on the line to
> defend the U.S. - I love this country and it's people and history.
>
>
> Your generalizations make you appear to be ignorant which may infact
> be an injustice. Whereas an educated argument, respectful of others,
> would hopefully be given the same respect in return by others reasonable
> enough to do so - even if they disagreed with it.
Yeah I have the impression that she would not oppose any immigration at
all if a) the southern land border was protected properly with no
"illegals" let in, b) terrorists did not obtain tourist visas, c) legal
immigrants consisted of a modest flow of highly-skilled, well-monitored
and willing-to-adapt people and d) the fit-to-work but lazy -including
such immigrants- were not enabled to live on taxpayers money.
One might disagree on her generalizations, or the attributes she assigns
to Mexicans (e.g. I don't agree to the statement that those who drive at
85mph on the Interstate are "usually illegals". Many Americans want
higher limits, exceed existing ones and refer to the German Autobahn).
But this is still nothing compared to rampant anti-Americanism
encountered here in Europe quite too often. For too many ignorant
people, the U.S. is the root of all evil. If I were American, this would
very well upset me.
> IMHO it would give your argument far more validity as a
> tangible approach. Not all immigrants are hopeless, parasitic losers who
> came here for a "free ride".
>
> I for one would put my life on the line to
> defend the U.S. - I love this country and it's people and history.
>
>
> Your generalizations make you appear to be ignorant which may infact
> be an injustice. Whereas an educated argument, respectful of others,
> would hopefully be given the same respect in return by others reasonable
> enough to do so - even if they disagreed with it.
Yeah I have the impression that she would not oppose any immigration at
all if a) the southern land border was protected properly with no
"illegals" let in, b) terrorists did not obtain tourist visas, c) legal
immigrants consisted of a modest flow of highly-skilled, well-monitored
and willing-to-adapt people and d) the fit-to-work but lazy -including
such immigrants- were not enabled to live on taxpayers money.
One might disagree on her generalizations, or the attributes she assigns
to Mexicans (e.g. I don't agree to the statement that those who drive at
85mph on the Interstate are "usually illegals". Many Americans want
higher limits, exceed existing ones and refer to the German Autobahn).
But this is still nothing compared to rampant anti-Americanism
encountered here in Europe quite too often. For too many ignorant
people, the U.S. is the root of all evil. If I were American, this would
very well upset me.
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Her son, not being 18 years old yet, cannot give her Resident Status.
That is for sure.
However, there are provisions in the current Immigration Law to allow
spouses of US citizens to gain Resident Status in case of abuse.
This link should help you:
http://uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/battered.htm
However, I strongly recommend her to contact an Immigration Attorney
in the US.
Good luck!
(Bill & Vicky) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Here's the scenario:
>
> Man, an American citizen, moves to Switzerland, has legal residency
> and job there. After a few years, he goes to India and marries woman,
> who he brings back to Switzerland. They have a son, who is a U.S.
> citizen and has a U.S. passport. Two years later, there are "domestic
> problems". The husband is willing to allow the wife to go back to
> India with the son, but begrudgingly refuses to help in any way
> (signing papers, for instance) for her to become a legal U.S. resident
> or citizen. She wants to come to the U.S. to live with the man's
> parents for a time, and they want to help in any way they can.
>
> What are her options? Can she obtain legal U.S. residency or
> citizenship by virtue of her two year old son being a U.S. citizen?
> .
> .
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> e m a i l : v a n y o @ e c h o e s . n e t
That is for sure.
However, there are provisions in the current Immigration Law to allow
spouses of US citizens to gain Resident Status in case of abuse.
This link should help you:
http://uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/battered.htm
However, I strongly recommend her to contact an Immigration Attorney
in the US.
Good luck!
(Bill & Vicky) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Here's the scenario:
>
> Man, an American citizen, moves to Switzerland, has legal residency
> and job there. After a few years, he goes to India and marries woman,
> who he brings back to Switzerland. They have a son, who is a U.S.
> citizen and has a U.S. passport. Two years later, there are "domestic
> problems". The husband is willing to allow the wife to go back to
> India with the son, but begrudgingly refuses to help in any way
> (signing papers, for instance) for her to become a legal U.S. resident
> or citizen. She wants to come to the U.S. to live with the man's
> parents for a time, and they want to help in any way they can.
>
> What are her options? Can she obtain legal U.S. residency or
> citizenship by virtue of her two year old son being a U.S. citizen?
> .
> .
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> e m a i l : v a n y o @ e c h o e s . n e t