99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
May 2nd 2007, 6:58 pm
#1
strangely floppy..
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ohio - originally London
Posts: 1,719
99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
May 2nd 2007, 8:26 pm
#2
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
May 2nd 2007, 10:01 pm
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
"CarlM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] m...
|
| I thought it would be much lower!
|
| http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
|
| --
|
Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the organizational
leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of regular
training and update with the laws, poor communication with other relevant
agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
performance for some immigration officers but almost nil accountability for
their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and responsibility
at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
incentive to excel.
Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because the
system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range investigations.
With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be expected to
perform at an excellent level.
This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is merely to
get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
immigration enforcement system.
If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
obvious to be inadmissible.
news:[email protected] m...
|
| I thought it would be much lower!
|
| http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
|
| --
|
Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the organizational
leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of regular
training and update with the laws, poor communication with other relevant
agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
performance for some immigration officers but almost nil accountability for
their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and responsibility
at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
incentive to excel.
Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because the
system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range investigations.
With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be expected to
perform at an excellent level.
This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is merely to
get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
immigration enforcement system.
If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
obvious to be inadmissible.
May 3rd 2007, 12:30 pm
#4
strangely floppy..
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ohio - originally London
Posts: 1,719
Re: 99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
"CarlM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] m...
|
| I thought it would be much lower!
|
| http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
|
| --
|
Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the organizational
leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of regular
training and update with the laws, poor communication with other relevant
agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
performance for some immigration officers but almost nil accountability for
their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and responsibility
at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
incentive to excel.
Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because the
system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range investigations.
With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be expected to
perform at an excellent level.
This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is merely to
get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
immigration enforcement system.
If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
obvious to be inadmissible.
news:[email protected] m...
|
| I thought it would be much lower!
|
| http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
|
| --
|
Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the organizational
leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of regular
training and update with the laws, poor communication with other relevant
agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
performance for some immigration officers but almost nil accountability for
their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and responsibility
at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
incentive to excel.
Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because the
system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range investigations.
With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be expected to
perform at an excellent level.
This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is merely to
get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
immigration enforcement system.
If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
obvious to be inadmissible.
..and what do you do for fun, old chap??
Jeez!
May 3rd 2007, 7:35 pm
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
"CarlM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] m...
|
| > "CarlM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| > news:[email protected] m...
| > |
| > | I thought it would be much lower!
| > |
| > | http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
| > |
| > | --
| > |
| >
| > Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the
| > organizational
| > leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of
| > regular
| > training and update with the laws, poor communication with other
| > relevant
| > agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
| > performance for some immigration officers but almost nil
| > accountability for
| > their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
| > applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and
| > responsibility
| > at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
| > incentive to excel.
| >
| > Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because
| > the
| > system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range
| > investigations.
| > With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
| > number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be
| > expected to
| > perform at an excellent level.
| >
| > This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is
| > merely to
| > get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
| > immigration enforcement system.
| >
| > If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
| > obvious to be inadmissible.
|
| .and what do you do for fun, old chap??
|
| Jeez!
|
| --
|
If I take the first letters of the names of the things I do for fun, I could
complete the English alphabet.
How about you?
news:[email protected] m...
|
| > "CarlM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| > news:[email protected] m...
| > |
| > | I thought it would be much lower!
| > |
| > | http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/142/
| > |
| > | --
| > |
| >
| > Considering factors such as inherent inefficiency in the
| > organizational
| > leadership, political correctness and stressful environment, lack of
| > regular
| > training and update with the laws, poor communication with other
| > relevant
| > agencies and the chain of management, less than acceptable job quality
| > performance for some immigration officers but almost nil
| > accountability for
| > their unwise decisions, there are more than just a few inadmissible
| > applicants that get away with it everyday. Accountability and
| > responsibility
| > at all levels is a factor that is not greatly stressed so there is no
| > incentive to excel.
| >
| > Highly complicated fraudulent schemes are usually not caught because
| > the
| > system is hindered in dealing with long term and wide range
| > investigations.
| > With the extraordinary amount of workload in most POEs compared to the
| > number of inspectors, the system is extremely overloaded to be
| > expected to
| > perform at an excellent level.
| >
| > This may sound good for many applicants whose primary concern is
| > merely to
| > get in but it is detrimental to a nation's goal of having a quality
| > immigration enforcement system.
| >
| > If you are refused admission, maybe you are either unlucky or just too
| > obvious to be inadmissible.
|
| .and what do you do for fun, old chap??
|
| Jeez!
|
| --
|
If I take the first letters of the names of the things I do for fun, I could
complete the English alphabet.
How about you?
May 4th 2007, 12:47 pm
#6
strangely floppy..
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ohio - originally London
Posts: 1,719
Re: 99.9% of Port of Entry arrivals allowed into the US!
Xylophone Playing
Yanking my Doodle
Zebra Fondling
yep - i got the whole alphabet!
