Mrtravel

Andy Platt wrote:
a) They would be trying to make somebody stateless which might have been
good enough reason for the courts to throw out the de-naturalization
even if
they believed the other factors warranted de-naturalization.

He wasn't naturalized, so how could he be de-naturalized?

b) They would have thrown even more attention on the blatantly illegal
detention of prisoners of war by having an (ex) US citizen there.

Has the World Court ruled this to be "illegal"?

Andy Platt

"mrtravel" wrote in message
news:[email protected]
t...
    > Andy Platt wrote:
    > >
    > a) They would be trying to make somebody stateless which might have been
    > good enough reason for the courts to throw out the de-naturalization
    > even if
    > they believed the other factors warranted de-naturalization.
    > He wasn't naturalized, so how could he be de-naturalized?

Sorry, stripped of US citizenship then.

    > b) They would have thrown even more attention on the blatantly illegal
    > detention of prisoners of war by having an (ex) US citizen there.
    > Has the World Court ruled this to be "illegal"?

Has it been brought before the World Court yet?! The US is so opposed to the
WC it would probably ignore it anyway.

Andy.

--
I'm not really here - it's just your warped imagination.