British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   "work to live" vs "live to work" (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/work-live-vs-live-work-756328/)

elop Apr 27th 2012 1:03 am

"work to live" vs "live to work"
 
After reading many of the threads over the past couple of months I've seen many people compare the work ethics of UK/US in terms of living to work and working to live so I thought the topic deserved its own thread.
In most (all?) cases people seem to favour working to live. Am I the only one who prefers to live to work?

Maybe my understanding is different from others:

work to live:
don't particularly want to work but are forced to to "stay alive"
if suddenly won the lottery would not be working, or doing anything similar to work.
very clear business/pleasure divide.

live to work:
Most would still need the money, but is not the main incentive.
Enjoys job - would volunteer for extra work etc...
If suddenly won the lottery would probably still be doing the same thing (but perhaps slightly less)

Obviously I understand and agree that everyone needs a life outside work. But isn't that the same as saying that too much of something is bad? That should apply to everything, not just work. Surely too much of lying on the most beautiful beach in the world is not good either, or if you spent 8 hours a day every day with friends/family....would that not be excessive?

For those who are "work to live", what changes would you need in your life/work to become "live to work". For example, if someone paid you to do what you consider "life" - given that there are multiple aspects of everyone's life, just pick one of them. Would it be different if you owned your work....ie self-employed, or investor etc.

I realise that there are probably jobs out there which very few people enjoy....but there are many stories of such people who get honours and awards for doing the most menial of jobs to a great standard - I'm sure you can't get that by being simply "work to live".

If work is a necessary evil, it seems to be the highest recurring necessary evil. That is over 20% of the average person's life spent working. After you take away sleep, and other necessary evils of life (e.g. commuting, taking out rubbish, sorting out your broken car, and everything else you don't really enjoy doing, but have to) that probably leaves around 10% of your life. So you are using 20% of your life to achieve 10% of happiness (in the UK most of that 10% will be in the pub)....
Is it really worth being "work to live" for that 10%? Why not accept that to a certain extent work IS life (or part of it) and it therefore becomes 20% - ie, enjoy it.

At least for this forum, I hope its fair to assume that most people chose what they wanted to study/learn at some point, whether by professional education, or otherwise. With that assumption in mind, you should be doing what you've wanted to do, rather than forced into a profession - unless it was a wrong decision, of course.

Have I completely missed the point somewhere?

Derrygal Apr 27th 2012 1:17 am

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027820)
After reading many of the threads over the past couple of months I've seen many people compare the work ethics of UK/US in terms of living to work and working to live so I thought the topic deserved its own thread.
In most (all?) cases people seem to favour working to live. Am I the only one who prefers to live to work?

Maybe my understanding is different from others:

work to live:
don't particularly want to work but are forced to to "stay alive"
if suddenly won the lottery would not be working, or doing anything similar to work.
very clear business/pleasure divide.

live to work:
Most would still need the money, but is not the main incentive.
Enjoys job - would volunteer for extra work etc...
If suddenly won the lottery would probably still be doing the same thing (but perhaps slightly less)

Obviously I understand and agree that everyone needs a life outside work. But isn't that the same as saying that too much of something is bad? That should apply to everything, not just work. Surely too much of lying on the most beautiful beach in the world is not good either, or if you spent 8 hours a day every day with friends/family....would that not be excessive?

For those who are "work to live", what changes would you need in your life/work to become "live to work". For example, if someone paid you to do what you consider "life" - given that there are multiple aspects of everyone's life, just pick one of them. Would it be different if you owned your work....ie self-employed, or investor etc.

I realise that there are probably jobs out there which very few people enjoy....but there are many stories of such people who get honours and awards for doing the most menial of jobs to a great standard - I'm sure you can't get that by being simply "work to live".

If work is a necessary evil, it seems to be the highest recurring necessary evil. That is over 20% of the average person's life spent working. After you take away sleep, and other necessary evils of life (e.g. commuting, taking out rubbish, sorting out your broken car, and everything else you don't really enjoy doing, but have to) that probably leaves around 10% of your life. So you are using 20% of your life to achieve 10% of happiness (in the UK most of that 10% will be in the pub)....
Is it really worth being "work to live" for that 10%? Why not accept that to a certain extent work IS life (or part of it) and it therefore becomes 20% - ie, enjoy it.

At least for this forum, I hope its fair to assume that most people chose what they wanted to study/learn at some point, whether by professional education, or otherwise. With that assumption in mind, you should be doing what you've wanted to do, rather than forced into a profession - unless it was a wrong decision, of course.
Have I completely missed the point somewhere?

Do you live in the real world? Have you seen the employment situation (or lack of it)? Many of us are not "doing what we want to do" but doing what we have to do in order to pay our bills, keep our health insurance and keep our heads above water.

elop Apr 27th 2012 1:47 am

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Derrygal (Post 10027830)
Do you live in the real world? Have you seen the employment situation (or lack of it)? Many of us are not "doing what we want to do" but doing what we have to do in order to pay our bills, keep our health insurance and keep our heads above water.

Well, maybe
but given the name of this website "British Expats", and this forum (USA) I'm expecting most people on here will be British who have, or want to move to the USA. Aside from those who are moving on a marriage-based Visa, the majority will have something to offer the USA which implies some sort of success in the UK. Not many people will get a visa to the US by not doing what they want to do and barely keeping heads above water - wouldn't you agree?

I know I've made some generalisations, but I've made them here, not on Yahoo Questions, or similar, I'm using this website and forum as the context for the topic.

N1cky Apr 27th 2012 3:28 am

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027855)
Well, maybe
but given the name of this website "British Expats", and this forum (USA) I'm expecting most people on here will be British who have, or want to move to the USA. Aside from those who are moving on a marriage-based Visa, the majority will have something to offer the USA which implies some sort of success in the UK. Not many people will get a visa to the US by not doing what they want to do and barely keeping heads above water - wouldn't you agree?

I know I've made some generalisations, but I've made them here, not on Yahoo Questions, or similar, I'm using this website and forum as the context for the topic.

I think you've missed the point.

Most people work so hard because they have to, so they CAN live. If they don't work their balls off by going above and beyond and working silly hours, they will likely lose their job as there are 100s of people who will be prepared to do that.

md95065 Apr 27th 2012 3:36 am

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027820)
For those who are "work to live", what changes would you need in your life/work to become "live to work". For example, if someone paid you to do what you consider "life" - given that there are multiple aspects of everyone's life, just pick one of them. Would it be different if you owned your work....ie self-employed, or investor etc.

My priorities and perspective have changed over time.

Until my mid to late 30's I didn't distinguish "work to live" and "live to work" - I needed to work to make enough money to live but I also enjoyed what I did so there was no conflict.

Now, at 56, I still need to "work to live" - after 35 years or so I don't particularly enjoy what I do any more, but I am still good at it and it pays well so the most practical thing for me to do right now is to stick with it until I feel that I have enough money stashed away to retire, which is probably still about another 5 years away ...

Of course I have ideas of other things that I would rather be doing, and some of them would actually produce some income, but they would not produce *enough* income for me to live on so I would end up having to spend some of my savings (which, as I said, are still not quite at the point that I would like them to be) and probably have to go on working much longer that I really want to.

Sorry, but youthful ideals pretty quickly take a back seat to needing to be able to pay the bills.

elop Apr 27th 2012 2:12 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by N1cky (Post 10027910)
I think you've missed the point.

Most people work so hard because they have to, so they CAN live. If they don't work their balls off by going above and beyond and working silly hours, they will likely lose their job as there are 100s of people who will be prepared to do that.

I'm afraid that wasn't exactly the point I was trying to make. The context here is British expats in USA. Most of such people had to go through a lot of trouble (H1-B, EB-1, and other visas), even if sponsored by a company there is often a huge loss made (selling houses, double tax etc). The conversations in here regarding 'work to live' are about people who don't want to work their balls off and want more holidays etc, but they came here knowing they would get less of that. If the idea was just to live, then why go through all the hassle, just stay in the UK and work at McDonald's - millions of people do that around the world and live comfortably - if they lose their jobs there is always KFC (or benifits).
Those on H1B or EB-1 tend to have degrees and possibly masters or PhD, and have invested time and money to do what they are doing - this doesn't seem to accurately describe the situation you are talking about.

WEBlue Apr 27th 2012 2:13 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 
I've done both "work to live" & "live to work". I've barely tolerated some jobs I've had & absolutely loved others, & this is in several different countries. Like anyone else, I prefer the latter, prefer to love what I'm doing so much that I jump out of bed eager to go to work. But working to live is OK too, better than unemployment IMO.

For years I worked a job in England (health services) with no sick days & very limited holiday time, so I never enjoyed the relaxed work/life balance that people on here seem to think is a such a hallmark of British employment. It was tough but I realize I miss it now.

elop Apr 27th 2012 2:14 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by md95065 (Post 10027915)
My priorities and perspective have changed over time.

Until my mid to late 30's I didn't distinguish "work to live" and "live to work" - I needed to work to make enough money to live but I also enjoyed what I did so there was no conflict.

Now, at 56, I still need to "work to live" - after 35 years or so I don't particularly enjoy what I do any more, but I am still good at it and it pays well so the most practical thing for me to do right now is to stick with it until I feel that I have enough money stashed away to retire, which is probably still about another 5 years away ...

So I guess that's the inevitable, I have that to look forward to :-)

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 2:34 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 
You're really quite far off the mark with your assumptions. Not everyone is lucky enough to be able to be able to do what they love or even what they 'chose to study'. Have you idea how many Ph.Ds are sitting in crappy dead end jobs because of the competition in their field?

Me, I only work because I have to. If I had the means I'd flick a v-sign to the job market and bugger off and have some fun.

ChocolateBabz Apr 27th 2012 2:53 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027820)
Obviously I understand and agree that everyone needs a life outside work. But isn't that the same as saying that too much of something is bad? That should apply to everything, not just work. Surely too much of lying on the most beautiful beach in the world is not good either, or if you spent 8 hours a day every day with friends/family....would that not be excessive?

But if you didn't have to work you wouldn't spend that time doing the same thing every day, you would be free to pursue whatever you wanted to.

I am sure there are some people who are genuinely happy to go to work every day and love what they do, I just haven't ever met a single one!

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 2:59 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 
Is today "International Idiots Day"?

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 2:59 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by ChocolateBabz (Post 10028653)
But if you didn't have to work you wouldn't spend that time doing the same thing every day, you would be free to pursue whatever you wanted to.

I am sure there are some people who are genuinely happy to go to work every day and love what they do, I just haven't ever met a single one!

Even doing what you love can take its toll though. As much as I'd love to be a professional musician, I had a six-gig weekend back in March that was right in the middle of quite a bad cold. Three late nights in a row plus I could barely speak on the Sunday afternoon.

It was fun and I made a decent haul, but it was a bit of a taste of the reality of what 'doing what I love' as a living might be like.

scrubbedexpat097 Apr 27th 2012 3:06 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028658)
Even doing what you love can take its toll though. As much as I'd love to be a professional musician, I had a six-gig weekend back in March that was right in the middle of quite a bad cold. Three late nights in a row plus I could barely speak on the Sunday afternoon.

It was fun and I made a decent haul, but it was a bit of a taste of the reality of what 'doing what I love' as a living might be like.

Yes but if you were a professional musician you wouldn't have the pressure and stress of the day job as well would you..

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 3:08 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Sugarmooma (Post 10028667)
Yes but if you were a professional musician you wouldn't have the pressure and stress of the day job as well would you..

It would greatly depend on what I was actually doing. As a teacher, or a session/stand in player, I'd not have much stress. As a songwriter I'd have deadlines and the fact that I'm really not very good at writing songs bearing down on me :D

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 3:09 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Sugarmooma (Post 10028667)
Yes but if you were a professional musician you wouldn't have the pressure and stress of the day job as well would you..

Professional Drama Queen. :nod:

ChocolateBabz Apr 27th 2012 3:10 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028673)
It would greatly depend on what I was actually doing. As a teacher, or a session/stand in player, I'd not have much stress. As a songwriter I'd have deadlines and the fact that I'm really not very good at writing songs bearing down on me :D

You have gone and replaced work with more work. I was thinking more along the lines of reading books and eating cake!

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 3:12 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by ChocolateBabz (Post 10028678)
You have gone and replaced work with more work. I was thinking more along the lines of reading books and eating cake!

If it was able to be done on my terms, it wouldn't be work. The only time something vocational like music becomes 'work' is when someone else sticks their neb in and makes it about them.

elop Apr 27th 2012 3:13 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by ChocolateBabz (Post 10028653)
But if you didn't have to work you wouldn't spend that time doing the same thing every day, you would be free to pursue whatever you wanted to.

I am sure there are some people who are genuinely happy to go to work every day and love what they do, I just haven't ever met a single one!

Really? I've met hundreds....to not meet any your encounters must be limited to those only on minimum wage. You've never met an actor, lawyer, CEO/CTO, doctor, inventor, entrepreneur??, the list goes on...

Some of these people, after 10 years or so (often less), can resign for the rest of the lives, and still have more money than the rest of us, but often they carry on...that's the difference between a job and a career - I'm even sure that their lives have ups and downs like everyone else, but generally they are happy with what they do. Money aside, there's music and art which some people do for free. I've been to many bars in London/Bristol with live music where the musicians are not getting paid any money.

I think the key is in your first paragraph: "...you would be free to pursue whatever you wanted to".......what if you're already doing what you wanted to?

elop Apr 27th 2012 3:17 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Sugarmooma (Post 10028667)
Yes but if you were a professional musician you wouldn't have the pressure and stress of the day job as well would you..

say that to Kurt Cobain and Richey Edwards, to name a couple....perhaps a different kind of stress.

scrubbedexpat097 Apr 27th 2012 3:24 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10028694)
say that to Kurt Cobain and Richey Edwards, to name a couple....perhaps a different kind of stress.

You missed my point...and I can't stand out in the parking lot any longer to explain

AmerLisa Apr 27th 2012 3:28 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Sugarmooma (Post 10028709)
You missed my point...and I can't stand out in the parking lot any longer to explain

Just the image of that, SM, is giving me a chuckle! :rofl:

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 3:30 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028656)
Is today "International Idiots Day"?

Yes Eb ... it most certainly seems that way. :nod:

AmerLisa Apr 27th 2012 3:35 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028731)
Yes Eb ... it most certainly seems that way. :nod:

What! SOS didn't agree with you? :eek:

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 3:36 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by AmerLisa (Post 10028742)
What! SOS didn't agree with you? :eek:

Stop proving his point, dear.

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 3:38 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028746)
Stop proving his point, dear.

She can't help herself ... as soon as she puts finger to keyboard ...

Sally Redux Apr 27th 2012 3:38 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028731)
Yes Eb ... it most certainly seems that way. :nod:

It's Plonkers' Friday.

AmerLisa Apr 27th 2012 3:38 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028746)
Stop proving his point, dear.

:flirtyeyes::D

AmerLisa Apr 27th 2012 3:39 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028749)
She can't help herself ... as soon as she puts finger to keyboard ...

You know.... I see a lot of that around here, do you think its the site? :unsure:

scrubbedexpat097 Apr 27th 2012 3:44 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 
It's too windy now..

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 3:46 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Sally Redux (Post 10028750)
It's Plonkers' Friday.

Morons' Monday ... Twatty Tuesday ... Wankers' Wednesday ... Thickos' Thursday ... Fukcwits' Friday ... Sadsacks' Saturday ... Simpletons' Sunday.

Sally Redux Apr 27th 2012 3:48 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028768)
Morons' Monday ... Twatty Tuesday ... Wankers' Wednesday ... Thickos' Thursday ... Fukcwits' Friday ... Sadsacks' Saturday ... Simpletons' Sunday.

Ooh I need your crabbiness, baby, eight days a week.

Nutmegger Apr 27th 2012 4:00 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028681)
If it was able to be done on my terms, it wouldn't be work. The only time something vocational like music becomes 'work' is when someone else sticks their neb in and makes it about them.

But, unless one is at the level of, say, a Bob Dylan or a Barbra Streisand who can call their own shots, isn't even music always on someone else's terms when it is a means of earning a living as opposed to being a hobby? The record company's, the promoter's? Even the local municipality that imposes the curfew at the live show? The union local that says the road crew can't do this or that? And in the olden days the radio station that said the track was too long to be played on the air? It's always something, whatever the job!

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 4:05 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Nutmegger (Post 10028794)
But, unless one is at the level of, say, a Bob Dylan or a Barbra Streisand who can call their own shots, isn't even music always on someone else's terms when it is a means of earning a living as opposed to being a hobby? The record company's, the promoter's? Even the local municipality that imposes the curfew at the live show? The union local that says the road crew can't do this or that? And in the olden days the radio station that said the track was too long to be played on the air? It's always something, whatever the job!

There's a degree of flexibility for the weekend warrior - I can choose whether or not I want to do a gig because my living doesn't depend on it (though I rarely turn one down). I'd lose that flexibility if I went pro.

However - by maintaining a day job, I can still write songs and get them out there myself. With sites like you tube and facebook, self-promotion via the internet is actually a viable option for those that can support themselves via other means, therefore bypassing the need to deal with the Simon Cowells of the world ...

Xebedee Apr 27th 2012 4:08 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027820)
Maybe my understanding is different from others:

work to live:
don't particularly want to work but are forced to to "stay alive"
if suddenly won the lottery would not be working, or doing anything similar to work.
very clear business/pleasure divide.

live to work:
Most would still need the money, but is not the main incentive.
Enjoys job - would volunteer for extra work etc...
If suddenly won the lottery would probably still be doing the same thing (but perhaps slightly less)

Have I completely missed the point somewhere?

I absolutely fu(king loathe the expression "live to work / work to live". Its such a complete and utter shite attempt to white-wash the fact that working is nothing more than theft and buggery of your time on this planet.

Work to Live = Work pays your cost of living.
Live to Work = Work defines your way of life.

Also, its rather amusing that people who quote that expression are usually trying to convince themselves of it.

I find its more accurate and thought provoking to discuss work in terms of "cost of living" and "way of life". Much more revealing........

Uncle Ebenezer Apr 27th 2012 4:10 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028799)
There's a degree of flexibility for the weekend warrior - I can choose whether or not I want to do a gig because my living doesn't depend on it (though I rarely turn one down). I'd lose that flexibility if I went pro.

You'd also lose your house.

Nutmegger Apr 27th 2012 4:12 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing (Post 10028799)
However - by maintaining a day job, I can still write songs and get them out there myself. With sites like you tube and facebook, self-promotion via the internet is actually a viable option for those that can support themselves via other means, therefore bypassing the need to deal with the Simon Cowells of the world ...

That's what I mean -- as you say your income doesn't depend on it, so it is a whole different ballgame when music is something you love to do, and not your living.

SultanOfSwing Apr 27th 2012 4:17 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Uncle Ebenezer (Post 10028808)
You'd also lose your house.

Bastard :D


Originally Posted by Nutmegger (Post 10028812)
That's what I mean -- as you say your income doesn't depend on it, so it is a whole different ballgame when music is something you love to do, and not your living.

Right. I'd be worried that I'd not love music anymore if it became 'work' as opposed to that thing I do to help me forget how mind-numbingly depressing it is that I have to work in the first place ...

Noorah101 Apr 27th 2012 4:27 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by elop (Post 10027820)
work to live:
don't particularly want to work but are forced to to "stay alive"
if suddenly won the lottery would not be working, or doing anything similar to work.
very clear business/pleasure divide.

live to work:
Most would still need the money, but is not the main incentive.
Enjoys job - would volunteer for extra work etc...
If suddenly won the lottery would probably still be doing the same thing (but perhaps slightly less)

Interesting question. I think I work to live. I love my job, but I wouldn't do it for free. If I won the lottery, I'd still work, but less (I'd get bored doing nothing at all). I do have a clear business/pleasure divide. My daily grind work (which I happen to enjoy - at least I don't hate it) pays my bills and gives me the spending money to do what I enjoy outside of work. I have a part-time job that I also love, and would do for free (but I happen to get paid for it).


At least for this forum, I hope its fair to assume that most people chose what they wanted to study/learn at some point, whether by professional education, or otherwise. With that assumption in mind, you should be doing what you've wanted to do, rather than forced into a profession - unless it was a wrong decision, of course.
I was sort of forced into a full time desk job due to the circumstances of my life at the time I took this job. I ended up like it and loving the company, and have stuck with it 22 years now, and will most likely retire from this company, if they keep me around that long! I chose to study/learn something else entirely, back in college, but in the real world that didn't earn enough stable income to support myself, thus the regular desk job. I still do the work that I studied for and love, but I do it part time, so it's more like a hobby that I also get some side money for.

Also, my personality is such that if I start thinking of the hobbies I enjoy as "work", I suddenly don't like them as well. "Work" should be one thing, "pleasure" should be my hobbies that I enjoy outside of work. As soon as a hobby becomes something I MUST do in order to survive (i.e. regular hours, paycheck, demands made on my time), I don't enjoy it anymore...

I definitely need to be doing *something*, I can't just sit around. I hope I'm healthy enough in my retirement years to do lots of traveling, as that is what I miss most about having a "work to live" life.

Oops, I just read the beginning of this thread....for the record, I'm a USC (not a Brit ExPat). :)

Rene

elop Apr 27th 2012 8:28 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 

Originally Posted by Noorah101 (Post 10028837)
Also, my personality is such that if I start thinking of the hobbies I enjoy as "work", I suddenly don't like them as well. "Work" should be one thing, "pleasure" should be my hobbies that I enjoy outside of work. As soon as a hobby becomes something I MUST do in order to survive (i.e. regular hours, paycheck, demands made on my time), I don't enjoy it anymore...

Interesting, so theoretically speaking, if your employer were to pay you for what you consider "pleasure", you would become more productive at what you consider work, and be willing to do it for free? So you would be doing more work but loving it, getting paid the same amount, but in a different way. Nothing beats a bit of reverse psychology :)



Originally Posted by Noorah101 (Post 10028837)
Oops, I just read the beginning of this thread....for the record, I'm a USC (not a Brit ExPat). :)
Rene

From the looks of your signature, it looks like you immigrated to the US not too long ago

Noorah101 Apr 27th 2012 8:51 pm

Re: "work to live" vs "live to work"
 
From the looks of your signature, it looks like you immigrated to the US not too long ago[/QUOTE]

I'm the USC spouse. My husband immigrated to the USA in 2004. Unlike me, he lives to work...definitely loves what he does, and is a workaholic! He repairs antique oriental rugs.

Rene


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:51 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.