The US and Canada
#16
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











Keep in mind things like welfare vary quite a bit state to state as it does province to province, there is no one system for either country.
If your poor in Canada and can't afford food, your at the mercy of charity which varies greatly, some food banks only open 1 or 2 times per month and only typically provide around 2 days of food, often sugary foods and not healthy.
Where the US has food stamp program.
If we say lived in California at our current income level we would qualify for food stamps, where here in Canada we often struggle to afford food.
Not like welfare is great in Canada, in BC a single person on assistance receives a paltry $385 per month and a housing supplement of up to $375 per month, good luck finding housing on that amount, let alone buy food.
They do up to $507.22 with a housing up to $570 for a family of 2
And to qualify you basically have to be destitute, they wont entertain helping until all other resources are fully exhausted and your basically homeless.
A family of 2 in California could get up to $778 US$ per month which isn't too far off once exchange rate is accounted for.
Canadian dollar also has less buying power, and wages on the lower end of the spectrum in Canada tend to be no better than the pay would be in the US and with prices being so much higher for basic food, its hard. $14/hr US in California goes further than $14 CAD in BC.
If your poor in Canada and can't afford food, your at the mercy of charity which varies greatly, some food banks only open 1 or 2 times per month and only typically provide around 2 days of food, often sugary foods and not healthy.
Where the US has food stamp program.
If we say lived in California at our current income level we would qualify for food stamps, where here in Canada we often struggle to afford food.
Not like welfare is great in Canada, in BC a single person on assistance receives a paltry $385 per month and a housing supplement of up to $375 per month, good luck finding housing on that amount, let alone buy food.
They do up to $507.22 with a housing up to $570 for a family of 2
And to qualify you basically have to be destitute, they wont entertain helping until all other resources are fully exhausted and your basically homeless.
A family of 2 in California could get up to $778 US$ per month which isn't too far off once exchange rate is accounted for.
Canadian dollar also has less buying power, and wages on the lower end of the spectrum in Canada tend to be no better than the pay would be in the US and with prices being so much higher for basic food, its hard. $14/hr US in California goes further than $14 CAD in BC.
#17
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 66
From: Blackburn, UK











...Canadian dollar also has less buying power, and wages on the lower end of the spectrum in Canada tend to be no better than the pay would be in the US and with prices being so much higher for basic food, its hard. $14/hr US in California goes further than $14 CAD in BC.
I read some time ago that Vancouver had finally cracked down on non-resident homeowners buying up the housing stock. I wish the US and the UK would get a bit more serious about that. The housing stock should be primarily reserved for residents, in my opinion, which would go a bit of the way toward addressing the housing affordability issue...
#18
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











It's interesting you mention the idea of growing the population... I know both Canada and Australia (where I spent a semester in college, but with which I otherwise have little experience) have an immigration dialogue along the lines of desired population growth.
That always seemed a bit strange to me... I'm certainly not opposed to immigration per se, but I guess when you grow up in a country with 300+ million people, you think, why would one want to set a goal to increase the country's population?
That always seemed a bit strange to me... I'm certainly not opposed to immigration per se, but I guess when you grow up in a country with 300+ million people, you think, why would one want to set a goal to increase the country's population?
Elderly benefits is one of the biggest costs to government, 48 billion in 2018, and continues to rise as boomer generation ages, without enough working age people, the government could not sustain itself with organic growth only.
I'd imagine more people in Canada would have children if Canada didn't have such a massively high cost of living, where the cost of living is low there tends to be little employment options.
#19
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 66
From: Blackburn, UK











Cost of living also varies widely, of course.
I read some time ago that Vancouver had finally cracked down on non-resident homeowners buying up the housing stock. I wish the US and the UK would get a bit more serious about that. The housing stock should be primarily reserved for residents, in my opinion, which would go a bit of the way toward addressing the housing affordability issue...
I read some time ago that Vancouver had finally cracked down on non-resident homeowners buying up the housing stock. I wish the US and the UK would get a bit more serious about that. The housing stock should be primarily reserved for residents, in my opinion, which would go a bit of the way toward addressing the housing affordability issue...
#20
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 66
From: Blackburn, UK











For Canada its pretty simply, people don't have enough babies anymore to sustain the population + boomer generation retiring and entering senior years = need more people.
Elderly benefits is one of the biggest costs to government, 48 billion in 2018, and continues to rise as boomer generation ages, without enough working age people, the government could not sustain itself with organic growth only.
I'd imagine more people in Canada would have children if Canada didn't have such a massively high cost of living, where the cost of living is low there tends to be little employment options.
Elderly benefits is one of the biggest costs to government, 48 billion in 2018, and continues to rise as boomer generation ages, without enough working age people, the government could not sustain itself with organic growth only.
I'd imagine more people in Canada would have children if Canada didn't have such a massively high cost of living, where the cost of living is low there tends to be little employment options.
Babies and children are expensive in developed countries, which creates a bit of a feedback loop. We cannot just keep bringing in large cohorts decade after decade, as they, too, will age and need care. I say, our elderly will just have to tighten their belts. Unfortunately, they vote ðŸ˜
#21
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











Cost of living also varies widely, of course.
I read some time ago that Vancouver had finally cracked down on non-resident homeowners buying up the housing stock. I wish the US and the UK would get a bit more serious about that. The housing stock should be primarily reserved for residents, in my opinion, which would go a bit of the way toward addressing the housing affordability issue...
I read some time ago that Vancouver had finally cracked down on non-resident homeowners buying up the housing stock. I wish the US and the UK would get a bit more serious about that. The housing stock should be primarily reserved for residents, in my opinion, which would go a bit of the way toward addressing the housing affordability issue...
#22
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 66
From: Blackburn, UK











...Drinking and driving in Canada is now a serious criminal offence and not a right of passage. Permanent residents can now be deported if convicted of DUI. Marijuana is legal and we don't care if you smoked a joint 25 years ago we will allow you into the country....
#23
Thread Starter
Forum Regular


Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 66
From: Blackburn, UK











It all worked out, of course, but it is a bit irritating.




