Ubble - Longevity explorer
#17
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
I stuck in 40 though just for the sake of it and got:
Your Ubble age is 15 years (15 to 17 years)
Your five-year risk of dying is 0.2%
I'm off to play in traffic for a bit to mess with their statistics.
#18
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
Age is only a number.
said Jimmy Saville
I used to tell myself the same thing. In reality though (for me) it's only four years. It seems like that can pass while I'm taking a dump these days
said Jimmy Saville
I used to tell myself the same thing. In reality though (for me) it's only four years. It seems like that can pass while I'm taking a dump these days
#19
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
As someone who is about to hit 35 I can categorically state that 40 is way way off.
I stuck in 40 though just for the sake of it and got:
Your Ubble age is 15 years (15 to 17 years)
Your five-year risk of dying is 0.2%
I'm off to play in traffic for a bit to mess with their statistics.
I stuck in 40 though just for the sake of it and got:
Your Ubble age is 15 years (15 to 17 years)
Your five-year risk of dying is 0.2%
I'm off to play in traffic for a bit to mess with their statistics.
Your Ubble age is 29 years (23 to 33 years)
Your five-year risk of dying is 0.4%
Clearly, it's not very good....but then my doc did say my veins aren't made of bacon, so perhaps I do have a few more years left in the tank.
#20
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
I thought my 35/0.7% was OK, given the chance that I'll probably be in a bit better nick at 40 than I am now anyway, even though I do have high blood pressure.
#21
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
My Ubble age is 2 years older than what I am now and my five year risk is 1.4%.
Given that I've never learned to drive or possessed a vehicle, I reckon the car ownership question is a poor way to measure wealth and affluence when the test could just ask a straightforward question about income instead.
Given that I've never learned to drive or possessed a vehicle, I reckon the car ownership question is a poor way to measure wealth and affluence when the test could just ask a straightforward question about income instead.
#22
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
#24
Re: Ubble - Longevity explorer
15 years below my real ago with a 1% chance of dying in the next 5 years. The only question I have is if I have the body of a 27 year old, why do I feel such a wreck!